Kef q900 or r300 for 2 channel

EDUBAG
EDUBAG Posts: 403
edited November 2011 in 2 Channel Audio
Hey guys,

i have been asking a lot about which speakers to get, making an upgrade from rtia7 which served me well but would like to focus more on 2 channel.

These cost about the same, the question is should i go with a bookshelf of a higher line? I like that the r300 is a three way design, the q900 is a two and a half way design. Im just wondering how much better of a line the r would be compared to the q.

Thank you guys for your help

eduardo
HT:
POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
CSI3 CENTER
DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
PSW 125 SUB
PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
APPLE TV 160GB
PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

2 CHANNEL:
KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES
Post edited by EDUBAG on

Comments

  • jaritta
    jaritta Posts: 277
    edited November 2011
    Kef is an excelent brand, I work for a kef dealer and we are impressed by the q series, that is what we have in our showroom for our home theater setup. We also have kef 201's that are steller.

    We dont have any of the R series, so i cant speak to how they sound, (the R line is a new series from kef) however at that price i am guessing that they share a similar box design from the q series with better drivers and crosovers maby they borrow some of the same driver tech from the refrence series. Either way you wont be disapointed with kef, they are a great performing speaker.
    Harman kardon signature 2.1 amp
    Denon 3312
    Epson 8700ub
    Chief mount
    Screen Innovations Performance Series 110in
    Kef q 500 (RL)
    Kef q 200 (C)
    Kef q 800 (Rear RL)
    REL T7 (SUB)
    mx 450 remote
    Sonos-Amp, Connect, Play5
  • EDUBAG
    EDUBAG Posts: 403
    edited November 2011
    jaritta wrote: »
    kef is an excelent brand, i work for a kef dealer and we are impressed by the q series, that is what we have in our showroom for our home theater setup. We also have kef 201's that are steller.

    We dont have any of the r series, so i cant speak to how they sound, (the r line is a new series from kef) however at that price i am guessing that they share a similar box design from the q series with better drivers and crosovers maby they borrow some of the same driver tech from the refrence series. Either way you wont be disapointed with kef, they are a great performing speaker.

    jajaja thank you jaritta, so in conclussion you my friend are not helping one bit about which one to choose. You have stated in your opinion my situation i hope that either choice will be an upgrade compared to my rtia7 but still wonder how much better the r line would be to the q line in sound quality.

    I can only guess that maybe the q line is more geared for double duty, and maybe r is more musical but i would be only guessing.

    Can you tell me how the xq (predecessor to the r) compares to the q? Maybe this will give me an idea.

    Regards,

    eduardo
    HT:
    POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
    CSI3 CENTER
    DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
    PSW 125 SUB
    PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
    APPLE TV 160GB
    PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
    50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

    2 CHANNEL:
    KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
    ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
    ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
    OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
    PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
    MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES
  • jaritta
    jaritta Posts: 277
    edited November 2011
    EDUBAG wrote: »
    jajaja thank you jaritta, so in conclussion you my friend are not helping one bit about which one to choose. You have stated in your opinion my situation i hope that either choice will be an upgrade compared to my rtia7 but still wonder how much better the r line would be to the q line in sound quality.

    I can only guess that maybe the q line is more geared for double duty, and maybe r is more musical but i would be only guessing.

    Can you tell me how the xq (predecessor to the r) compares to the q? Maybe this will give me an idea.

    Regards,

    eduardo

    Either would be a big upgrade compaired to the rti line that you have. I have RTIa5 and the kef Q 500 that we have in our showroom are HEAD AND SHOULDERS above how my rti line performes. I have the same equipment (denon3311) on my setup as we do in our showroom.

    Our company doesnt carry the xq series, we only cary the q and the refrence. That being said I have peresonally heard the xq's and they are, just as i said above, a combination of refrence and q.

    Bottom line, If i had the money I would go with the xq, (or the R) if you want a good comprimise then i would go with q900's. I peresonally dont have the cash for the r line so if i upgrade from my polks I will be going with the q's. Again either way it is a big step up from the polks. the q throws a wider soundstage, clear(er) vocals than my polks, deeper tighter bass.

    One last note, on the floor standers I beleive that the q series bass drivers have one active bass driver and the rest are passive, in the xq and r series have all active bass drivers .

    Hope this helps
    Harman kardon signature 2.1 amp
    Denon 3312
    Epson 8700ub
    Chief mount
    Screen Innovations Performance Series 110in
    Kef q 500 (RL)
    Kef q 200 (C)
    Kef q 800 (Rear RL)
    REL T7 (SUB)
    mx 450 remote
    Sonos-Amp, Connect, Play5
  • EDUBAG
    EDUBAG Posts: 403
    edited November 2011
    remember that my choices are the q900 or the three way bookshelf r300. so pricewyse they are not that different. the q cost 1600 and the pair of r300 bookshelf 1800.

    that is why i ask if the r bookshelf will b better than the top of the line q? in the forum some people prefer the lsi7 to any rtia7/9 for music, so since the r300 is more a direct competition to the lsim703 makes me wonder if they will provide a big enough soundstage considering that the y are three way with a 6.5" bass driver.

    however i really appreciate your input and time. i guess i will have to wait for the r to come out and then make a decision.

    regards,

    eduardo
    HT:
    POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
    CSI3 CENTER
    DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
    PSW 125 SUB
    PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
    APPLE TV 160GB
    PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
    50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

    2 CHANNEL:
    KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
    ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
    ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
    OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
    PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
    MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES
  • pearsall001
    pearsall001 Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2011
    Having just purchased the Q900's I can offer a little first hand opinion. I listened to the Q300, 500, 700, 900. along with the XQ40, 20 & Ref 205/2. I loved the Ref 205/2 but the budget scenerio made me eliminate them as one of my choices. The 900's more than held their own with the XQ series, they fell a tad short against the Ref's though (not too much of a suprise). I was offered a killer deal on the XQ's because of the new "R" series being released. I just kept going back to listen to the 900's...they're simply fantastic to say the least. I owned the LSI15's at the time & the 900's simply were leagues ahead of them, & I really enjoyed the 15's. In fact I would venture to say the 900's would be a great comparison to the new LSiM series. Of course in the end it's your opinion, so get out there & give them all a listen. Also how big is your room & are you using a sub for 2 channel?
    "2 Channel & 11.2 HT "Two Channel:Magnepan LRSSchiit Audio Freya S - SS preConsonance Ref 50 - Tube preParasound HALO A21+ 2 channel ampBluesound NODE 2i streameriFi NEO iDSD DAC Oppo BDP-93KEF KC62 sub Home Theater:Full blown 11.2 set up.
  • EDUBAG
    EDUBAG Posts: 403
    edited November 2011
    Actually i might do double duty but are more focused on two channel, i do not plan to add a sub but feel that for music a three way bookshelf if it is very good can handle my room. My room size is about 17 x 17 with 8' ceilings.
    Having just purchased the Q900's I can offer a little first hand opinion. I listened to the Q300, 500, 700, 900. along with the XQ40, 20 & Ref 205/2. I loved the Ref 205/2 but the budget scenerio made me eliminate them as one of my choices. The 900's more than held their own with the XQ series, they fell a tad short against the Ref's though (not too much of a suprise). I was offered a killer deal on the XQ's because of the new "R" series being released. I just kept going back to listen to the 900's...they're simply fantastic to say the least. I owned the LSI15's at the time & the 900's simply were leagues ahead of them, & I really enjoyed the 15's. In fact I would venture to say the 900's would be a great comparison to the new LSiM series. Of course in the end it's your opinion, so get out there & give them all a listen. Also how big is your room & are you using a sub for 2 channel?
    HT:
    POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
    CSI3 CENTER
    DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
    PSW 125 SUB
    PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
    APPLE TV 160GB
    PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
    50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

    2 CHANNEL:
    KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
    ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
    ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
    OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
    PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
    MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES