Which speaker crossover to use
I have polk audio's rm7 satalite speakers.
According to polk the crossover should be set at 120.
When I ran audyssey it set the crossover at:
Fronts: 100
Center: 110
Rear: 100
Should I go with audyssey or polk's recommended crossover setting?
Thanks
According to polk the crossover should be set at 120.
When I ran audyssey it set the crossover at:
Fronts: 100
Center: 110
Rear: 100
Should I go with audyssey or polk's recommended crossover setting?
Thanks
Post edited by ddank on
Comments
-
It really isn't that crucial. If Audyssey detected the -3dB point lower than the spec'd point, then that just means your in-room response is slightly better than the anechoic specs. Setting it lower as your AVR has done reduces the chances of directionality, so it should be fine the way it is.
But to be clear: Audyssey does NOT set crossover points. It detects the -3dB point for its equalization and passes that info on to the AVR manufacturer's software, which determines the crossover point. Unless you hear an obvious problem, your current settings are fine... Let your ears be the judge.Equipment list:
Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
Emotiva XPA-3 amp
Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen -
kuntasensei wrote: »It really isn't that crucial. If Audyssey detected the -3dB point lower than the spec'd point, then that just means your in-room response is slightly better than the anechoic specs. Setting it lower as your AVR has done reduces the chances of directionality, so it should be fine the way it is.
But to be clear: Audyssey does NOT set crossover points. It detects the -3dB point for its equalization and passes that info on to the AVR manufacturer's software, which determines the crossover point. Unless you hear an obvious problem, your current settings are fine... Let your ears be the judge.
Thanks for the reply. I've thought the lower setting as better but wanted to be sure I wasn't losing anything. You're explanation was very helpful to my understanding.