Call of Duty MW2/Black Ops or Bad Company 2

AsSiMiLaTeDAsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,717
edited July 2011 in Video Games
Both games feel like very different styles, with BC2 to me feeling more realistic and more difficult as a result.

I'm curious which you guys like, and why.
Post edited by AsSiMiLaTeD on

Comments

  • AlmadacrAlmadacr Posts: 185
    edited July 2011
    Bad company , team work against gun and run :biggrin:
  • ZerosZeros Posts: 945
    edited July 2011
    I play both regularly, but I prefer BC2. Its probably because I'm better at it than black ops. I think its because in BC2 I can move slower and more strategically with the bigger maps. In black ops, its like spawn, run, die - over and over again. At least it is for me. It can be frustrating.
  • tommyboytommyboy Posts: 1,444
    edited July 2011
    Zeros wrote: »
    I play both regularly, but I prefer BC2. Its probably because I'm better at it than black ops. I think its because in BC2 I can move slower and more strategically with the bigger maps. In black ops, its like spawn, run, die - over and over again. At least it is for me. It can be frustrating.

    Good for you I'm absolutely terrible at BC2. Whats the secret cause I get destroyed. The key to being decent at COD is knowing the maps and knowing where your enemies will be coming from. Maybe thats why I suck so bad at bad company cause I haven't played the game enough. I enjoyed the single player much more than BO and MW2 though.
    AVR: H/K AVR240
    Fronts: Monitor 50s
    Center: CSI3
    surrounds: R15s
    Sub:Velodyne DPS10
    Dvd/Cd: Samsung HD upconverter (for now)
    TV: 50" Sammy Plasma
    game hardware: 360 and gcn.
    Gamertag: kovster27
  • AsSiMiLaTeDAsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,717
    edited July 2011
    The single player in BC2 was alot of fun, love the shots they take at MW2 with the character dialauge
  • kuntasenseikuntasensei Posts: 3,270
    edited July 2011
    I prefer CoD, mostly because of how difficult it is to get any random room of people to act like a team in any of the Battlefield games. Unless you have your own crew of guys, I've found that it's a pain in the **** to play any Battlefield game. Or I could just suck at it. :biggrin:

    Either way, I'll be playing both CoD:MW3 and Battlefield 3 come November, so it's all good.
    Equipment list:
    Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
    Emotiva XPA-3 amp
    Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
    SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
    Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
    DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
    Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
    Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen
  • AsSiMiLaTeDAsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,717
    edited July 2011
    One thing that kills me with MW2 is the lack of dedicated servers, but I'm sure that topic has been beaten to death already...
  • grimmace19grimmace19 Posts: 1,431
    edited July 2011
    I havent tried the bad company series yet but sure wouldn't mind giving it a shot after the rut ive been in lately on MW2. I'm usually the best in the room I'm playing in but lately I've been getting smoked by teams of 2 or 3 guys who I can admit to being completely better than me.
  • ZerosZeros Posts: 945
    edited July 2011
    I prefer CoD, mostly because of how difficult it is to get any random room of people to act like a team in any of the Battlefield games. Unless you have your own crew of guys, I've found that it's a pain in the **** to play any Battlefield game. Or I could just suck at it. :biggrin:

    Either way, I'll be playing both CoD:MW3 and Battlefield 3 come November, so it's all good.

    I totally agree with this. That's why I am now friends with a bunch of Jim Ackley's Renegade buddies and mostly play with them since at least one or two of them are always on.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!