Coolest camera tech EVER!

kuntasensei
kuntasensei Posts: 3,263
edited June 2011 in The Clubhouse
Anyone interested in digital photography, check this out:
http://www.smartplanet.com/blog/science-scope/groundbreaking-camera-lets-you-shoot-now-focus-later/8810?tag=mantle_skin%3Bcontent

Click on the pictures to change the focus point. Seriously groundbreaking if they can get that tech into a consumer-priced camera. It's rare that something like this impresses me, but... I had to pick my jaw up off the floor when I was able to re-focus on a reflection in a window. :eek:
Equipment list:
Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
Emotiva XPA-3 amp
Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen
Post edited by kuntasensei on

Comments

  • bigaudiofanatic
    bigaudiofanatic Posts: 4,415
    edited June 2011
    Awesome!
    HT setup
    Panasonic 50" TH-50PZ80U
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Carver A400X :cool:
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Kef 104/2
    URC MX-780 Remote
    Sonos Play 1

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900
  • JustinHEMI
    JustinHEMI Posts: 198
    edited June 2011
    That is impressive. I love truly innovative ideas completely change the things we take for granted.
    Fronts: Polk RTi A9's
    Center: Polk CSi A6
    Surrounds: Polk FXi A6
    Sub: Epik Empire
    Receiver: Onkyo TX-NR809
    Amp: Emotiva XPA-3
    Blu Ray: Panasonic DMP-BD210
    Power: Monster HDP 2500
    Monitor: Panasonic TC-P60ST30
  • DMara
    DMara Posts: 1,434
    edited June 2011
    I got to say this is one of the best innovations icon14.gif
    Gears shared to both living room & bedroom:
    Integra DHC-80.3 / Oppo BDP-105 / DirecTV HR24 DVR /APC S15blk PC-UPS
    Living room:
    LSiM707's / LSiM706c / LSiM702 F/X's / dual JL Audio Fathom F113's / Parasound Halo A51 / Panasonic 65" TC-P65VT50
    Bedroom:
    Usher Dancer Mini 2 Diamond DMD's / Logitech SB Touch / W4S STP-SE / W4S DAC-2 / W4S ST-1000 / Samsung 52" LN52B750
    Other rooms:
    Audioengine AP4's / GLOW Audio Sub One / audio-gd NFB-3 DAC / Audioengine N22
    audio-gd NFB-10.2 / Denon AH-D7000
  • Joe08867
    Joe08867 Posts: 3,919
    edited June 2011
    That is some cool stuff right there.
  • engtaz
    engtaz Posts: 7,663
    edited June 2011
    Should be very interesting when it hits retail.
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.
  • mudwrx
    mudwrx Posts: 367
    edited June 2011
    Very, very impressive.
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited June 2011
    Stuff this tech into a micro four-thirds and you'd have one impressive setup.

    This is awesome tech. Thanks for sharing!
    design is where science and art break even.
  • danger boy
    danger boy Posts: 15,722
    edited June 2011
    being a long time photographer... this is way cool. i want one now.. :biggrin:
    PolkFest 2012, who's going>?
    Vancouver, Canada Sept 30th, 2012 - Madonna concert :cheesygrin:
  • kuntasensei
    kuntasensei Posts: 3,263
    edited June 2011
    danger boy wrote: »
    being a long time photographer... this is way cool. i want one now.. :biggrin:

    I know... When I saw it, the voice in my head screamed, "SOLD!" :biggrin:
    Equipment list:
    Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
    Emotiva XPA-3 amp
    Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
    SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
    Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
    DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
    Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
    Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen
  • vlam
    vlam Posts: 282
    edited June 2011
    Main Gear
    Panasonic 50" Plasma, Polk LSi15 (Front), LSiC, LSi7 (Rear), Sherwood Newcastle AVP-9080, AM-9080 bi-amp to LSi15, AM-9080 bi-amp to LSiC and LSi7.
  • amulford
    amulford Posts: 5,020
    edited June 2011
  • Fireman32
    Fireman32 Posts: 4,845
    edited June 2011
  • maggiefan
    maggiefan Posts: 223
    edited June 2011
    There's a news article about this on DP Review. It's the first item on their home page.

    http://www.dpreview.com/
    Larry
  • mrbigbluelight
    mrbigbluelight Posts: 9,714
    edited June 2011
    Makes the term, "Point and Shoot", a reality. Sweeeeet !
    Sal Palooza
  • On3s&Z3r0s
    On3s&Z3r0s Posts: 1,013
    edited June 2011
    I'm gonna play devil's advocate and say I'll be surprised if this turns out to live up to the hype. I played with the online demo a little and wasn't super impressed with the quality of the photography. I'm having a hard time imagining that this will be capable of coming close to what a competent photographer with a DSLR camera and a decent lens could do. Interesting tech, for sure, but it seems gimmicky and likely to fall into the no-man's land of too expensive for the average point-and-shoot user and too point-and-shoot for someone who's good with a camera.
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited June 2011
    Right now this is merely changing the main focus point when using what is known as a shallow depth of field (only the main subject is in sharp with the rest of the image "blurry" or our of focus). It will do nothing to correct motion blurr or poor exposure...which causes more bad photos than focus blur. It is just taking a lot of low resolution information and running it through a very powerful processing program. Innovative for sure...but it can't take a bad image and turn it into a great one or even fix a bad one. That may be possible down the road...but will probably have more to do with using the stills from super high speed video. Imagine taking a couple of seconds of video...then being able to produce a sitll from one of several hundred images...
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • newrival
    newrival Posts: 2,017
    edited June 2011
    shack wrote: »
    Right now this is merely changing the main focus point when using what is known as a shallow depth of field (only the main subject is in sharp with the rest of the image "blurry" or our of focus). It will do nothing to correct motion blurr or poor exposure...which causes more bad photos than focus blur. It is just taking a lot of low resolution information and running it through a very powerful processing program. Innovative for sure...but it can't take a bad image and turn it into a great one or even fix a bad one. That may be possible down the road...but will probably have more to do with using the stills from super high speed video. Imagine taking a couple of seconds of video...then being able to produce a sitll from one of several hundred images...

    For sure. And imagine this in conjunction with RED technology.
    You're right, this isn't going to help the uninitiated amateur, but if you can apply depth of field and focus point post processing, thats just sick. the possibilities seem endless.
    design is where science and art break even.
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited June 2011
    newrival wrote:
    You're right, this isn't going to help the uninitiated amateur, but if you can apply depth of field and focus point post processing, thats just sick. the possibilities seem endless.

    IMO it is exactly the opposite...I think (at least for now) the technology is fairly limited in scope.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
  • On3s&Z3r0s
    On3s&Z3r0s Posts: 1,013
    edited June 2011
    I can't remember where I saw it but a while ago someone came out with a camera/post-processing platform that would put as much of the image in focus as possible. Instead of adjusting the image to show what it would have looked like with focus depth set variously with a standard camera, it would composite the image to create something that a standard SLR could never produce. I think the example they used was an extreme macro photo of an insect where a standard SLR could either show the head or the body in focus but not both at the same time. The software merged the images so that everything appeared in focus in a single image. I'd guess this software could do the same... seems like the more interesting use case.
  • shack
    shack Posts: 11,154
    edited June 2011
    On3s&Z3r0s wrote: »
    I can't remember where I saw it but a while ago someone came out with a camera/post-processing platform that would put as much of the image in focus as possible. Instead of adjusting the image to show what it would have looked like with focus depth set variously with a standard camera, it would composite the image to create something that a standard SLR could never produce. I think the example they used was an extreme macro photo of an insect where a standard SLR could either show the head or the body in focus but not both at the same time. The software merged the images so that everything appeared in focus in a single image. I'd guess this software could do the same... seems like the more interesting use case.

    This is called focus stacking and has been around for a while. Much like a HDR photo (multiple images taken then combined to deal with difficult exposure issues) focus stacking will take a series of images (all the same) with each one having a different focal point...then merge them together to form one image with a great depth of field that simply could not be accomplished with a single shot. Helicon Focus is a really good program to use - http://www.heliconsoft.com/heliconfocus.html. There are a couple of good videos/examples to better demonstrate what it does.
    "Just because you’re offended doesn’t mean you’re right." - Ricky Gervais

    "For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase

    "Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson