Google Mars Object

fatchowmein

Hoax? Transformer? NASA? Walmart? Google HQ? I find it amusing.

<object style="height: 390px; width: 640px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sTJt0LJZG2k?version=3"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sTJt0LJZG2k?version=3&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="390"></object>

stuwee

That guy is a trip, I half expected to hear him start coughing and a cloud of smoke drift in front of the screen :biggrin:

But then again, you know, Mars' moon Phobos is one of the darkest objects in our solar system, and orbits the planet twice in one Martian day, the only way an object it's size could do that is if it was hollow, or made of a lightweight material, and not solid rock.........:eek:

zingo

stuwee wrote: »

But then again, you know, Mars' moon Phobos is one of the darkest objects in our solar system, and orbits the planet twice in one Martian day, the only way an object it's size could do that is if it was hollow, or made of a lightweight material, and not solid rock.........:eek:

However, mapping by the Mars Express probe and subsequent volume calculations do suggest the presence of voids within the moon and indicate that it is not a solid chunk of rock but a porous body instead. The porosity of Phobos was calculated to be 30% +/- 5%, or a quarter to a third of the moon being hollow. This void space is mostly on small scales (millimeters to ~1-m), between individual grains and boulders.

breal74

"i'm not sure NASA knows about it". That is some funny stuff!

tonyb

Why is it when it comes to these sort of things, you only get a blurry pic, yet we can see light years into space crystal clear ?

Jstas

breal74 wrote: »

"i'm not sure NASA knows about it". That is some funny stuff!

NASA knows all about how porous that rock is down to the centimeter sizes, can give detailed descriptions of the surface of that moon and provided the imagery for the composite that he's using to view what he thinks is some kind of alien probe and he thinks NASA doesn't know about it?

Get real.

Hmmm, I wonder if he'd be interested in some ocean front property in Arizona?

Joe08867

Thanks for the George Strait song Jstas.

I'll be singing that in my head all afternoon now.

Jstas

Joe08867 wrote: »

Thanks for the George Strait song Jstas.

I'll be singing that in my head all afternoon now.

No problem!

<iframe width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/F23LgqiX2AA&quot; frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Ron-P

tonyb wrote: »

Why is it when it comes to these sort of things, you only get a blurry pic, yet we can see light years into space crystal clear ?

Hey, the same goes for all the UFO footage on this planet, it's all 100% hoax, that's why we never, ever get to see clear cut images or video.

sucks2beme

Ron-P wrote: »

Hey, the same goes for all the UFO footage on this planet, it's all 100% hoax, that's why we never, ever get to see clear cut images or video.

Somebody isn't too happy about that statement

AsSiMiLaTeD

video has been removed

mrbigbluelight

Oh, you peoples. If you'd listen to George Noory on "Am Coast to Coast" you'd know that this picture was taken near the Polar Ice cap. Going to the ORIGINAL pic (which was glitched), the digital encoding was pretty much a "1...0.....1.....0......1.....0.....1". A NASA programmer (for whatever purpose: self amusement, bored, ?) added banded color to the ORIGINAL pic to make it look like it does.

There you have it. Any questions on BigFoot, Sasquatch, Aliens, Men in Black, cables vs wire, ghosts, "Grays", Roswell (and/or Aztech) New Mexico, Unicorns, tubes vs solid state, The Illuminati, Trilateral Commision, ....... I've got answers !

Not saying they'll be right .... I'll make something up if I have to