Are Polk LSi 15's recommended for HT?
I have a pair of LSi 15's for sale and someone is interested but is 50/50 home theater and 2 channel.
He is unsure if the LSi15's are recommended for home theater.
Anyone give me some advise?
Thanks Glen
He is unsure if the LSi15's are recommended for home theater.
Anyone give me some advise?
Thanks Glen
Post edited by Bababouey on
Comments
-
I have 4 LSi15s in my HT and think they work great for HT, and surround sound music.Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes
Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables
Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
Three 20 amp circuits. -
Really?????????
They are "OK" I think polk makes matching surrounds and a matching center speaker as well for the LSi15's
Someone will chime in if they do..Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎
SVS SB16 X2
Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified
VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM
MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s -
I'm using a couple of them as the left and right channels of my HT set. They've been marvelous! No complaint at all from meGears shared to both living room & bedroom:
Integra DHC-80.3 / Oppo BDP-105 / DirecTV HR24 DVR /APC S15blk PC-UPS
Living room:
LSiM707's / LSiM706c / LSiM702 F/X's / dual JL Audio Fathom F113's / Parasound Halo A51 / Panasonic 65" TC-P65VT50
Bedroom:
Usher Dancer Mini 2 Diamond DMD's / Logitech SB Touch / W4S STP-SE / W4S DAC-2 / W4S ST-1000 / Samsung 52" LN52B750
Other rooms:
Audioengine AP4's / GLOW Audio Sub One / audio-gd NFB-3 DAC / Audioengine N22
audio-gd NFB-10.2 / Denon AH-D7000 -
I run them as surrounds, and they are perfect.The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD
“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson -
TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »Really?????????
They are "OK" I think polk makes matching surrounds and a matching center speaker as well for the LSi15's
Is that sarcasm?
Anyway, Polk makes the LSiC for the center. I did have one, but I upgraded it to a PSB Synchrony One Center. It blended perfectly with the LSi15s but is a 3 times bigger center with a more enveloping sound.Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes
Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables
Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
Three 20 amp circuits. -
I have a pair of LSi 15's for sale and someone is interested but is 50/50 home theater and 2 channel.
He is unsure if the LSi15's are recommended for home theater.
Anyone give me some advise?
Thanks Glen
Yes , they are recommended for Home Theater use. They will do a fine job running double duty. I'm very picky with my speakers and I can say that the Lsi's are a good choice for double duty music and movies on a budget but what something more out of their music. Yes the Rti line is better suited for theater use as they are more dynamic but they lack the detail and clarity the Lsi's have.Dan
My personal quest is to save to world of bad audio, one thread at a time. -
I've been using a full LSi system for HT for years. They have many different speaker choices in the line. LSi25s and LSi15s for towers, LSi7s and LSi9s for bookshelf, LSi F/Xs for dipole/bipole, and LSiC for center.
I'd say they are 'overkill' for HT, not 'ok'. Paired with a beefy subwoofer and proper amplification, there just isn't any reason why an LSi system can't hang with and exceed lines designed specifically for HT use. The slam and impact is delivered by the subwoofer. And the same qualities that make the LSis great for music make them great for the midbass and higher frequencies in lossless blu-ray audio tracks.
But that's the catch. In order to use the LSis effectively, you have to build an audiophile system (with appropriate amplification, etc.) around them. Unless you're willing to make the investment, there are more cost effective options like the Rti line out there. -
But that's the catch. In order to use the LSis effectively, you have to build an audiophile system (with appropriate amplification, etc.) around them. Unless you're willing to make the investment, there are more cost effective options like the Rti line out there.
Exactly. Why have a sub par HT?
I want as much detail from a movie soundtrack as from a music soundtrack. And I am not talking about explosions. I love watching a movie and hearing the wind slightly come up in the rear and the leaves slightly rustle, or a creak in the floor board, or any other small, subtle sound that was deliberately added in the movie for its effect. If all you want from a HT are booms then maybe LSi speakers are only okay. If you want the best from the BR lossless then the LSi speakers are a great step in that direction.
Plus, my HT is also my SACD surround system so "HT" only speakers are unacceptable.Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes
Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables
Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
Three 20 amp circuits. -
The LSI's strong point is music. For HT I like a cleaner more detailed speaker.
-
The LSI's strong point is music. For HT I like a cleaner more detailed speaker.
So for music you prefer muddied and distorted?Mains.............Polk LSi15 (Cherry)
Center............Polk LSiC (Crossover upgraded)
Surrounds.......Polk LSi7 (Gloss Black - wood sides removed and crossovers upgraded)
Subwoofers.....SVS 25-31 CS+ and PC+ (both 20hz tune)
Pre\Pro...........NAD T163 (Modded with LM4562 opamps)
Amplifier.........Cinepro 3k6 (6-channel, 500wpc@4ohms) -
Thanks for the responses.
Much appreciated.
Glen -
The LSI's strong point is music. For HT I like a cleaner more detailed speaker.
???????????????????????
I think Mike got a valid question. If LSi strong point is music, what is the weakness you found that is less suitable for HT?
Or you meant you prefer sharper tweeter of RTi (RTiA) lines than LSi?So for music you prefer muddied and distorted?Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin: -
I recommend Lsi15's for both.
Since you have 5.1 or better for surround sound for a decent HT, they also work great for multichannel SACD's.Front - Polk LSiM 705, Center - Polk LSiM 704c, Rear - Polk LSi 7
Subwoofer - Epik Legend
Receiver (as Preamp) - Sony STR-DA3400 ES
Amplifier - Outlaw 7125
Television - 58" Samsung Plasma PN58B860
Blu Ray - OPPO BDP 83 -
I use LSi-15's for both and am very happy with the HT performance. But my system does around 80% music duty and I do my critical listening to music not HT. So if the guy is an HT fanatic he might have different standards.SystemLuxman L-590AXII Integrated Amplifier|KEF Reference 1 Loudspeakers|PS Audio Directream Jr|Sansui TU-9900 Tuner|TEAC A-6100 RtR|Nakamichi RX-202 Cassette
-
Jetmaker737 wrote: »if the guy is an HT fanatic he might have different standards.
For my 'HT' fanatic needs, I think the choice of subwoofer is more important than any subtle differences between the LSi and RTi lines. I would think 'critical' listening needs are similar for music as they are for HT. A properly amped pair of 15s has plenty of HT punch in the mid bass and higher frequencies, it just adds the musical strengths as well. IMHO. -
For my 'HT' fanatic needs, I think the choice of subwoofer is more important than any subtle differences between the LSi and RTi lines. I would think 'critical' listening needs are similar for music as they are for HT. A properly amped pair of 15s has plenty of HT punch in the mid bass and higher frequencies, it just adds the musical strengths as well. IMHO.
It's all about preference. -
It's all about preference.
Of course it is. Just never heard before that speakers that are good for music lack detail. Usually it's about removing veils and hearing things you've never heard before. So it may be just my preference, but I prefer the LSi 15s for the detail they reveal in both music and blu-ray lossless tracks. They have a good bass kick, tight and agile when amplified well. They are just a little weak on the lowest of the LFE level frequencies that a good HT track demands. I'd only describe them as not clean and detailed when running off an underpowered AVR. -
The LSI's strong point is music. For HT I like a cleaner more detailed speaker.
Music speakers can do HT well, but HT speakers can't do Music well in
my opinion.Linn AV5140 fronts
Linn AV5120 Center
Linn AV5140 Rears
M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
Odyssey Mono-Blocs
SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D -
If your speakers excel at music, they will be just fine for HT as well. Make sure you have a sub for the real low stuff & you are all set.Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2