The Thread is closed on burn in,But

PolkClyde
PolkClyde Posts: 662
edited February 2011 in Vintage Speakers
I didn't know my post about burn in,break in,be it tweeter or MIT Cables,would lead to what it did.but,I have to be honest, it was fun reading all the comments about it.Now, you all have left this young Audiofile a little more confused.I want each of you to help me pay my power bill for letting my stereo play for over 200hrs Non stop,thank you.No,seriously,I don't ever turn my stereo off anyway,I leave it on. Actually, this pass two weeks burn it,break in,was fun.I got re-acquainted<spell check, with my music again.


LET'S ENJOY THE MUSIC,AND the MIT CABLES... Smile!
PolkAudioClyde
Post edited by PolkClyde on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • thesurfer
    thesurfer Posts: 574
    edited February 2011
    I believe in speaker burn in,, and useing loudness control, when needed, OPPPS, should not have added that last part,,,, Audio gods could be lurking,,,
    Not an Audiophile, just a dude who loves music, and decent gear to hear it with.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,420
    edited February 2011
    thesurfer wrote: »
    I believe in speaker burn in,, and useing loudness control, when needed, OPPPS, should not have added that last part,,,, Audio gods could be lurking,,,



    Tone controls do help compensate for weakness elsewhere in your system, but have nothing whatsoever to do with the original intent of a recording. I despise them, and do not use them for any reason.:rolleyes:


    Is that the desired response?:tongue::wink:
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thesurfer
    thesurfer Posts: 574
    edited February 2011
    I respect your OP, Just an injoke,,,
    Not an Audiophile, just a dude who loves music, and decent gear to hear it with.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PolkClyde
    PolkClyde Posts: 662
    edited February 2011
    nooshinjohn wrote: »
    Tone controls do help compensate for weakness elsewhere in your system, but have nothing whatsoever to do with the original intent of a recording. I despise them, and do not use them for any reason.:rolleyes:


    Is that the desired response?:tongue::wink:

    I like the Bass EQ button on the Nad 1130
    PolkAudioClyde
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • silvertuner
    silvertuner Posts: 496
    edited February 2011
    you mean you dont need tone controls? **** time to redo it all

    some cheap free sony speakers
    psw125
    denon 1610
    3.1 channel because i hate cables ran across the living room like that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,244
    edited February 2011
    Tone controls suck!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • On3s&amp;Z3r0s
    On3s&amp;Z3r0s Posts: 1,013
    edited February 2011
    I kinda dig the feature to kick the bass up when listening at low volumes that many receivers have. It's the one thing (besides an FM tuner) that I miss when I swap out my receiver for separates.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter