I guess this would be a why?,Question: Burn in

On3s&Z3r0s

ben62670 wrote: »

So you can measure what food tastes best?

Also funny, I was just thinking how this thread reminds me of wine tastings I've been to (although there wasn't any Oscar Meyer products there).

If someone would come up with a test for the amount of butterscotch notes on the finish of a glass of chardonnay I would have to go to a lot fewer of those.

jcandy

ben62670 wrote: »

So you can measure what food tastes best?

It seems that you didn't read post 100:

Why would anyone want to measure "depth of soundstage"? Its a subjective concept that means different things to different people; its not a real property. Its like asking for a device that measures yumminess of ice cream. But we're not talking about yumminess, we're talking about some actual property of ice cream like sugar or fat content. When you talk about break-in, you're not talking about your own personal experience of break-in, you're making the claim that the tweeter, not you, is changing. To claim that the tweeter is changing AND that you know a priori its not a measurable change is so suspicious that its laughable.

Do you understand? You're not claiming that the tweeters are "opening up for ben62670", your claim is that the tweeters are just "opening up". The first is a subjective claim, the latter is an objective one. In fact, I do susepct that the tweeters might indeed "opening up for you", I just don't believe they are opening up as a matter of fact. This dichotomy is possible because we know for a fact that people imagine things.

RuSsMaN

Are we done here yet? Do it, don't do it. Believe it, don't believe it. Who gives a rats ****? Why aren't you guys LISTENING TO MUSIC right now?