Tips for reviewing speakers ,audio equipment and music

polkfarmboy
polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
edited February 2011 in Music & Movies
Sometimes I read reviews here and there by members on the forum that really impress me

I wonder how to structure such reviews and what to listen for when doing so ?

Is there literature that can give me a better understanding of what to listen for when doing the so called critical listening

I hear the term all the time"critical listening " but I dont fully understand the meaning
Post edited by polkfarmboy on

Comments

  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited February 2011
    Bring your favorite well recorded Cd's with you and listen. If you complicate it more than that you will be biased before you audition the equipment.
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • fishbones
    fishbones Posts: 947
    edited February 2011
    If you want some reading literature to understand more about this hobby. I highly recommend: The Complete Guide to High End Audio by Robert Harley (Stereophile writer). It's an excellent book.

    Critical listening is just that (critical listening). Sitting in the sweet spot (not moving around the room) of a properly setup system with a very familiar CD and paying attention to every aspect of the sound. Taking notes makes a big difference in accurately remembering what you heard as well, especially if you're comparing two pieces of equipment. Noting things like soundstage, upper frequencies, lower frequencies, midrange, etc, etc.

    As far as structure goes, that has to do more with writing.
    ..... ><////(*>
  • obieone
    obieone Posts: 5,077
    edited February 2011
    This is a purely subjective hobby, so I don't know what you would be able to gleam from a book.
    Me personally, I like a full range of sound, with an emphasis on the lower end. NOT window rattling bass, that we have to listen to at stop lights, but just the lower end of the spectrum, that a lot of speakers can't reach.
    Some people here, will tell you you HAVE TO have seperates, or tubes, or vinyl.
    I don't agree with those views, but, again, it's all subjective.
    I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited February 2011
    I assume you are talking about reviews where someone has added, or upgraded, a compnent in their system. They should be very familiar with how the system sounded before the upgrade, so they can easily detect any differences. Then the review should should state what they heard.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.