Advice on headphone purchase

Well, I just moved into my new apartment in Spokane, WA. Its a great apartment. I love it, except for one big thing. The walls within the apartment are paper thin. Turns out one of my roommates is going to start playing the guitar too. So, its seems only fair to me to look into get a pair of headphones. I would appreciate any and all recommendations and pieces of advice you have to offer. I have been especially impressed by Sennheiser. For me, having a nice pair of headphones offers me several advantages. They would be better than the Sony POS's I have now. I could watch movies and play games at full volume late at night (I tend to be insomniatic). I wouldn't have to listen to my roommates. And also I would have a set of speakers, or in this case headphones, worthy of my Audigy 2 in my computer.
So, yeah, I would appreciate to hear what you have to say. Thanks!
So, yeah, I would appreciate to hear what you have to say. Thanks!
Post edited by Shizelbs on
Comments
http://www.headphone.com/layout.php?topicID=1
I am an AKG fan, but have been turned on to Sennheiser lately. The Senn HD580 is an outstanding value and headphone. And some headphones are even upgradable...lol, like the Senn, you can upgrade the cable....man, we are not safe in any arena.
Usually in a high end headphones, you get into a impedence/ohm issue, which means that your headphone output on your source should be hot.
For example, the HD580 is 300ohms, which requires some higher than normal output voltage....or a headphone amplifier, which is a whole different ballgame. I have had zero issues with the ES driving my cans, but some people have experienced low volume output in other receivers/amplifiers/etc. Similar to an effect like driving LSi's with a Radio Shack Optimus amplifier....you know what I mean?
Here is a basic thought:
Open = Less Bass
Closed = More Bass
It is a generalization, but normally is the case for headphones.
madmax
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
Tour...
Vox Copuli
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb
"It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
"There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD
"Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner
"No, that's silly talk. Dude, you can't possibly be this audio dumb so quit the act." - Doro
"For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don't believe, no proof is possible." - Stuart Chase
"Consistency requires you to be as ignorant today as you were a year ago." - Bernard Berenson
On Saturday, the highest model they had was the 570. I listened to it for about 10 minutes maybe. I was really unimpressed. I mean, really unimpressed. So, I asked them to bring the others in, and I left. So, I go, they hook them up, and I am set to go. I try the 590 first. Much better than the 570 I would say. Pretty weak in the bass, but overall a pretty good headphone.
So, then I go to the 600. I will pretty much dedicate my rant here. Holy crap, what an ugly pair of cans. The grille on the side, I was aware already that they were kinda funky, but at least they weren't so bad that a quick, "Hey, eff off, these are $400 headphones" couldn't fix. Then I look at the headband part and its this ****-ugly faux stone paint job. Totally ugly. Furthermore, the 590's were really, really comfy. They felt great. The 600's felt like a vice grip on my melon. I admit, I have a larger than normal noggin, but man alive those suckers were just shy of actually hurting. Maybe they loosen up with time.
Now the sound. The 600's were much better than the 590's. However, all my listening was done with familiar sources, and I have to say, my R40's are much more inspiring. I listened to my Zep DVD at great length tonight, and I just didn't get the rush that I get at home. I don't get it. I mean, these headphones cost more than my R40 towers. I would expect them to sound clearly better. Maybe they did. Maybe my expectations were too high, but I just felt so blah after listening to maybe 4 songs.
The Nirvana CD was much better. They handled the tracks very well. The bass was tons tighter and cleaner and clearer than the 590's. By a long shot. The same goes for track 1 on the Transistor album. There is a ton of bass going on there, and it was handled with ease, but sounded like crap on the 590's.
Anyways, its getting late, so I am going to wrap this rant up. I was expecting to be really impressed. I was not. I felt like I would always take my HT setup over the phones. $400? Forget about it? I wouldn't even waste $200 on these. I realize that many of you will likely disagree with me, but that was my impression. I am willing to give them another chance someday, but tonight they were a total dud.
I'm out!
I've heard some nice music coming from AKG.
I'm telling you the Pro 4AA's are still very hard to beat for the money... $99.99.
http://www.koss.com/
Tour...
Vox Copuli
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt. - Old English Proverb
"It's easy to get lost in price vs performance vs ego vs illusion." - doro
"There is a certain entertainment value in ripping the occaisonal (sic) buttmunch..." - TroyD
"Death doesn't come with a Uhaul." - Dennis Gardner
The headphone experience is a lot different than speakers for sure. A few things to keep in mind are that since you are not feeling the sound waves you may be listening at too loud of a volume without perceiving it and of course that the sound is between your ears, not out in front of you. I had this volume problem for awhile before I realized what was going on and after I backed off I became very happy with the '600s. I'm not a real headphone enthusiast or very versed with them so take all this with a grain of salt. I think the 600's are probably really good as far as sound quality and acuracy goes but other ones are probably more "speaker like". I also think it reallly matters a lot what you drive them with. I'm talking compatibility more so than cost of equipment.
madmax
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
The bass, true, was not tremendous, but it was more than enough. The presence of bass was definitly there. That wasn't too much of an issue.
Also, I realize that the general effect of having headphones is much different than that of speakers. Nonetheless, that effect just didn't get me all excited. There was better articulation of fine details, especially in T2, but when I could hear them, I just though so what?
Like I said, I will keep my eyes open for deals, and listen to whatever I can when I have the chance. But until then, I think I will have to put up with the surroud sound from my roommates bedrooms.
Yea, its a shame they don't carry the HD580 and HD590.
Are we talking the actual Bass Shakers brand, or a more upscale "tactile transducer" system that can run you in the thousands?
PE has bass shakers on the cheap now, I've been eyeing them for a time.
The Bass Shaker brand is adequate for use in a couch or chair with headphones or even in conjunction with a subwoofer in a HT. If you really want to replace a subwoofer in a room then you end up with something like a few of the the Clarke Synthesis ones for a multi-thousand dollar setup. Some people just start with a couple bass shakers on an old chair and go from there. Fun to play with!
madmax
Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want...
How's this sound....put two bass shakers on each side of the chair, sofa, w/e....and wire each side out of phase, so when one side pushes the other side pulls and it mooooooves the chair back and forth?
BTW....for that kind of array, (4 bass shakers), how much "manliness" would one need in the amp(s) ? Single bass shakers are 4 ohms, BTW. I think the standard version can handle 25 watts and the "pro" version can take 50.
Pro Version
Regular **** Version