Jbl 4311
NeilGabriel
Posts: 1,487
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/ele/2172705538.html
Are these not worth the effort....I am sure it part depends on the conditions of the surrounds...etc....I seem to remember comparing these to the Polk 10B's when I got my first polks....also some advents and Bose 601...it was Salt Lake City...
Are these not worth the effort....I am sure it part depends on the conditions of the surrounds...etc....I seem to remember comparing these to the Polk 10B's when I got my first polks....also some advents and Bose 601...it was Salt Lake City...
Comments
-
Depends on if you like the JBL sound? A lot of SPL and bass, good for rock, concert stuff.
However, these are more like near field monitors and can sound a little muddy from a distance?
I prefer the next generation that went with JBLs Titanium domes. Better resolution up top. In fact I have a pair of that next generation and they are more articulate/cleaner in their highs than my stock SDA-2Bs with the SL2000s?
cnhCurrently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!
Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
[sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash] -
id personally pass on those, but thats just me
some cheap free sony speakers
psw125
denon 1610
3.1 channel because i hate cables ran across the living room like that