RCA to XLR Or Not?

ksnisbet86
ksnisbet86 Posts: 41
Im currently running rca to rca from my receiver to my amp. New house so its new wiring and my stuff is running on a dedicated 20 amp fuse. Question is, will it make that much of a difference if i go from rca-rca to rca-xlr? And if so could anybody recommend any good cables that arent gonna break the bank? Even if i dont have to go to the rca-xlr combo route what are some of the better rca-rca cords out there? :confused:

Thanks!
Post edited by ksnisbet86 on

Comments

  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited January 2011
    Stick with RCA to RCA. The benefits of XLR are nullified when you have an RCA on one end.
    Ben
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • ksnisbet86
    ksnisbet86 Posts: 41
    edited January 2011
    ok, great! thanks for the information!!....any idea what the best rcas to get are? well that wont break the bank?
  • ben62670
    ben62670 Posts: 15,969
    edited January 2011
    I sell them so I would prefer to let others chime in. Also please list associated gear.
    Thanks
    Ben
    Please. Please contact me a ben62670 @ yahoo.com. Make sure to include who you are, and you are from Polk so I don't delete your email. Also I am now physically unable to work on any projects. If you need help let these guys know. There are many people who will help if you let them know where you are.
    Thanks
    Ben
  • John K.
    John K. Posts: 822
    edited January 2011
    KS, as Ben correctly points out, there's no benefit in simply using a cable with an XLR connection on one end and one component that has a balanced XLR input. The reason is that there have to be three things for there to be a balanced signal path which gives higher resistance to electrical interference(not really needed in most home environments which don't have unusual levels of such interference): balanced output circuitry in the sending component, a cable with two central conductors rather than the one which a coaxial cable with RCA plugs has, and balanced input circuitry in the receiving component. The balanced output sends out two signals rather than one along the two wires of the cable, but one is reversed 180 degrees in polarity. The result is that the two music signals travel down the wires in opposite polarity, while any interference striking the cable travels down them in the same polarity. Then, the balanced input circuitry in the receiving component "re-reverses" the polarity so that the music signals are now of the same polarity and add to each other, while the noise signals are now of opposite polarity and tend to cancel each other out.

    Again though, while this may be helpful in professional installations involving long runs in an environment with lots of electrical interference, for typical home audio use the standard shielded coaxial cable with RCA plugs on the ends is entirely satisfactory. As to which ones to get, this is an area of audio where there's essentially no correlation between price and sound quality. The cable simply forms a low resistance path for the electromagnetic wave traveling down its outside which is carrying the music signals. The cables which I've used for several years in various lengths are these from MonoPrice , which are inexpensive cables of excellent quality which do their simple job as well as anything.
  • ksnisbet86
    ksnisbet86 Posts: 41
    edited January 2011
    all right, that actually helps out alot, its just, ive demoed some audioquest wires and ive actually heard a difference in the low end of speakers versus a different cable that made a difference more with the mids and highs....i was just curious about the rca to xlr inputs because audioquest has the setup of rca that you mention but i dont think my receiver sends out a balanced input although my amp would receive one. As far as equipment its a Pioneer Elite SC-25 Receiver and ive got that going to adcom 5800 amp....which is powering Polk Rti 10's, im happy with the sound, however i wouldnt mind a little more low end for my music is all.
    thanks for the explanation!
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited January 2011
    John K. wrote: »
    ... which are inexpensive cables of excellent quality which do their simple job as well as anything.


    What other "anything" cables have you compared? Or are you just talking out your butt once again?
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • TECHNOKID
    TECHNOKID Posts: 4,298
    edited January 2011
    BlueFox wrote: »
    What other "anything" cables have you compared? Or are you just talking out your butt once again?
    How typical, others express personal opinions and look what happens when it isn't in line with some other peoples opinions.

    Instead of challenging someone's that doesn't share your opinion, why don't you try to be proactive and provide the OP with logical, scientific reasons to back your own thinking? Can you do that withouth turning another thread into a nasty cable debate spoling the OP's thread?
    im happy with the sound, however i wouldnt mind a little more low end for my music is all.
    Now that is what is important. If you are happy with the sound and you already own the cable, might as well stick with it. Audioquest cables are decent cables.
    DARE TO SOAR:
    “Your attitude, almost always determine your altitude in life” ;)