Record companies pay $45 million for pirating music
jinjuku
Posts: 1,523
Pot meet kettle. Maybe what the ordinary citizen is asked to pay will be re-evaluated given what the the labels paid for 100's of thousands of infringements. Or not.
Post edited by jinjuku on
Comments
-
$45M / 300K = $150 per song. I wonder if people can ever use the defense, "I hoped to pay [them] at some point."
I don't share my music though. I just find their conduct hypocritical. -
maximillian wrote: »$45M / 300K = $150 per song. I wonder if people can ever use the defense, "I hoped to pay [them] at some point."
I don't share my music though. I just find their conduct hypocritical.
That is what I was thinking for Thomas-Rasset and Tenenbuam. Sauce that is good on goose is equally good on gander. -
I wonder if Lars and the rest of the Metallica boys will now become publicly outspoken for this like thery were against Napster? Ya right!!!SDA-1C (full mods)
Carver TFM-55
NAD 1130 Pre-amp
Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
The Clamp
Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
Ben's IC's
Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM -
I've always thought penalties for infringement were too high. Any time you see a case it's always in the millions, and usually the person being sued couldn't come up with that kinda cash in a few lifetimes. Penalties should be realistic... maybe 3-5x the cost of the item 'stolen'.... they'd probably make more money if they handed that **** out like traffic tickets rather than big court cases where they can never collect.... I think they just want to ruin a few peoples lives for the shock factor... either way not cool.