Current Setup - Bi Amped or Bi Wired?
nacam
Posts: 56
Hi all;
My current setup is a pair of SDA SRS 1.2TL's (RDO Upgraded). I am running these with a Rotel RB-1090. I currenty have 2 sets of cables running each speaker from the dual outputs on each channel of my Rotel to the highs and lows of my 1.2's. I have the jumpers removed, inerconnect cable is connected.
Some Questions:
1. Am I Bi-amping or Bi-wiring with this setup?
2. What effect does this setup have on the impeadance load on the amp? Is it dropping it to 4 ohms or raising it to 16 by removing the jumpers?
3. What would be the optimal way to set this up? What would happen if I simply put the jumpers back on and left it the way it is?
The reason is my amp seems to be topping out (the occasional driver pop), at levels I would expect this amp to be way more capable.
Could someone shed some light on this subject? I have read the threads about bi-amping/wiring and I get more confused the deeper I read into it.
TIA!
Nacam
My current setup is a pair of SDA SRS 1.2TL's (RDO Upgraded). I am running these with a Rotel RB-1090. I currenty have 2 sets of cables running each speaker from the dual outputs on each channel of my Rotel to the highs and lows of my 1.2's. I have the jumpers removed, inerconnect cable is connected.
Some Questions:
1. Am I Bi-amping or Bi-wiring with this setup?
2. What effect does this setup have on the impeadance load on the amp? Is it dropping it to 4 ohms or raising it to 16 by removing the jumpers?
3. What would be the optimal way to set this up? What would happen if I simply put the jumpers back on and left it the way it is?
The reason is my amp seems to be topping out (the occasional driver pop), at levels I would expect this amp to be way more capable.
Could someone shed some light on this subject? I have read the threads about bi-amping/wiring and I get more confused the deeper I read into it.
TIA!
Nacam
2 Channel Basement Setup:
PC With M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 Card
Rotel RC-1070
Rotel RB-1090
Polk Audio SDA SRS 1.2TL (1991) w/RD0-198 Tweeters.
PC With M-Audio Audiophile 24/96 Card
Rotel RC-1070
Rotel RB-1090
Polk Audio SDA SRS 1.2TL (1991) w/RD0-198 Tweeters.
Post edited by nacam on
Comments
-
Hi all;
My current setup is a pair of SDA SRS 1.2TL's (RDO Upgraded). I am running these with a Rotel RB-1090. I currenty have 2 sets of cables running each speaker from the dual outputs on each channel of my Rotel to the highs and lows of my 1.2's. I have the jumpers removed, inerconnect cable is connected.
Some Questions:
1. Am I Bi-amping or Bi-wiring with this setup?2. What effect does this setup have on the impeadance load on the amp? Is it dropping it to 4 ohms or raising it to 16 by removing the jumpers?3. What would be the optimal way to set this up? What would happen if I simply put the jumpers back on and left it the way it is?
SOME folks think that bi-wiring makes some wonderful audible difference. I think they're deluded. the only difference is the halving of speaker wire resistance, and the increase in capacitance and inductance from having twice as much copper hanging off the back of the amplifier. What's important is what YOU think you hear.The reason is my amp seems to be topping out (the occasional driver pop), at levels I would expect this amp to be way more capable.
Maybe you've got a partially-failed speaker driver or two.
Maybe it's time to re-cap the crossovers. Well, OK, it's SURELY time to re-cap the crossovers...but that may have nothing to do with the problems you're having. -
I'd agree on the either overdriving or a bad driver bottoming out a voicecoil. That Rotel is a hefty amp and should not have any trouble driving these speakers properly.HT: Polk SDA SRS 2.3 main fronts, Klipsch RC-25 center channel, Polk RTi-150 rears, M&K V1B sub, Denon AVR-5800, Samsung 52" LCD, Sony BDP-S550
2 Channel: Carver ALS Platinum, Audio Research LS-2B preamp, Counterpoint SA-100 amplifier, Integra CD player, Denon SL7D tt, TC750 phono pre, Nikko tuner