Marantz 2285b, wooooooww!!!

EDUBAG
EDUBAG Posts: 403
edited November 2010 in 2 Channel Audio
Hello guys,

just got last week a marantz 2285b made in 1978. I have heard by a lot of people that vintage equipment sounds better than modern gear (generally speaking).

So i got this receiver for my office rig and tried it in my main system rtia7 towers, and woooooooooooowwwwwwwww!!!! What a beatyfull sound and great strenght i was shocked to say the least that this receiver almost my age (i was born in 76) could push the towers so easily and loud.

At 85 wpc is no slouch but i am comparing it to my pio elite avr as pre amplified by a 200 wpc rotel rb990bx and can say that the marantz goes almost as high and sounds better (in my opinion).

If some of you guys have similar gear please share since it was an eye opener for me.

Now i am going after pioneer spec 1 and spec 2 that i found close by. To try those as a permanent two channel system.

Again wow wow wow.

Thanks,

ed
HT:
POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
CSI3 CENTER
DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
PSW 125 SUB
PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
APPLE TV 160GB
PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

2 CHANNEL:
KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES
Post edited by EDUBAG on

Comments

  • dkg999
    dkg999 Posts: 5,647
    edited November 2010
    I've always thought the mid-70's Marantz receivers sounded great, but then I'm biased because a Marantz 2270 was probably my first "real" audio gear I bought as a kid. Congratulations!
    DKG999
    HT System: LSi9, LSiCx2, LSiFX, LSi7, SVS 20-39 PC+, B&K 507.s2 AVR, B&K Ref 125.2, Tripplite LCR-2400, Cambridge 650BD, Signal Cable PC/SC, BJC IC, Samsung 55" LED

    Music System: Magnepan 1.6QR, SVS SB12+, ARC pre, Parasound HCA1500 vertically bi-amped, Jolida CDP, Pro-Ject RM5.1SE TT, Pro-Ject TubeBox SE phono pre, SBT, PS Audio DLIII DAC
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,590
    edited November 2010
    I found this true as well with my Dad's on Yamaha stereo reciever. It powered some cheap Sony floorstandings and added all kinds of bass and response my newer Sony reciever couldnt....

    I actually am going to take my Denon 1610 off and try the Yammy with my current office gear at some point to determine if I should just sell it and keep the Yamaha instead...the only problem I have is that I wanted to add a sub for 2.1 and am not sure how to wire that correctly...
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • ken brydson
    ken brydson Posts: 8,762
    edited November 2010
    EDUBAG wrote: »
    Hello guys,

    just got last week a marantz 2285b made in 1978. I have heard by a lot of people that vintage equipment sounds better than modern gear (generally speaking).

    So i got this receiver for my office rig and tried it in my main system rtia7 towers, and woooooooooooowwwwwwwww!!!! What a beatyfull sound and great strenght i was shocked to say the least that this receiver almost my age (i was born in 76) could push the towers so easily and loud.

    At 85 wpc is no slouch but i am comparing it to my pio elite avr as pre amplified by a 200 wpc rotel rb990bx and can say that the marantz goes almost as high and sounds better (in my opinion).

    If some of you guys have similar gear please share since it was an eye opener for me.

    Now i am going after pioneer spec 1 and spec 2 that i found close by. To try those as a permanent two channel system.

    Again wow wow wow.

    Thanks,

    ed

    That is so funny that you posted this today. Just yesterday I re-did my office rig with my Marantz 2252B (bought new in '78)and added a Sony CDP-C8ESD that I just bought from Starkiller here on the forum. TT is a Kenwood KD-2070, speakers are RTA8t's ($30 on CL). I was amazed at how good it sounded. I also was asking myself about using a newer unit. I have a Sony STRDA1ES sitting in my closet. Ther Marantz isn't going anywhere :biggrin:
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,967
    edited November 2010
    I'm a big fan of the older Marantz, Sansui receivers. Built like tanks and some good sounds to boot. Just wish I never sold my old stuff years ago. Just goes to show that build quality trumps technology at times. Congrats on your pickup,if you ever have some coin laying around,treat yourself to upgrade the innards a tad,you'd be surprised at what those old receivers are capable of.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Fongolio
    Fongolio Posts: 3,516
    edited November 2010
    I've got a Sansui G6700 receiver in my bedroom that rocks the Casbah. I'm rebuilding and refinishing a couple of Yamaha CR series receivers as well (CR800 and CR1000). Beautiful real wood cabinets on all three of them. The CR1000 has a teak cabinet. Sweet sounding too and very powerful. I just love vintage gear!
    SDA-1C (full mods)
    Carver TFM-55
    NAD 1130 Pre-amp
    Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
    The Clamp
    Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
    Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
    Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
    Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
    Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
    ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
    Ben's IC's
    Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited November 2010
    Here are a few pics of a Pioneer I sold a litttle while back.



    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D
  • EDUBAG
    EDUBAG Posts: 403
    edited November 2010
    Wow snow, that is a nice unit. Do you know how good the spec i / 2 combo is? It seems that you know vintage pioneer.

    I think i can get them both for 600 - 800, would it be a super better sound than the marantz?
    HT:
    POLK AUDIO RTI4 FRONTS
    CSI3 CENTER
    DEF TECH PROMONITOR800 SURROUNDS
    PSW 125 SUB
    PIONEER ELITE AVR23TXH AVR
    APPLE TV 160GB
    PANASONIC BLURAY PLAYER
    50" PANASONIC PLASMA TCP50C2

    2 CHANNEL:
    KEF R300 THREE WAY BOOKSHELF GLOSS PIANO BLACK
    ROTEL RC 990BX PRE
    ROTEL RB 990BX AMP
    OPPO DV980 (AS CD PLAYER)
    PIONEER PL100 TURNTABLE WITH SHURE MX97E CART
    MIT EXP2 SPEAKER CABLES
  • sucks2beme
    sucks2beme Posts: 5,601
    edited November 2010
    I like vintage gear as much as anyone else, but the prices on some of this
    30+ year old gear is too much. You can buy a used much more modern
    amp at that price range and have something that is going to last a while.
    Unless some very good tech heaped some resto love upon it,
    it's a ticking time bomb.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • snow
    snow Posts: 4,337
    edited November 2010
    EDUBAG wrote: »
    Wow snow, that is a nice unit. Do you know how good the spec i / 2 combo is? It seems that you know vintage pioneer.

    I think i can get them both for 600 - 800, would it be a super better sound than the marantz?
    I cant answer that for you, every brand has its following some prefer the Pioneer sound others Marantz Kenwood Sansui etc, you would simply have to listen for your self and see which you prefer. As far as to how good the spec combo is would likely depend on whether or not it has been re capped lately and bad solder joints resoldered etc.

    REGARDS SNOW
    Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all :D
  • George Grand
    George Grand Posts: 12,258
    edited November 2010
    The vintage Pioneer and Sansui are pretty to look at, but super-overrated from a sonic perspective. They probably all (Marantz, Kenwood, etc.) are. Best sounding receiver I ever heard had 33wpc and second best is 15.

    I have my "dream" pieces from years ago now that I can afford them. An Acoustic Research "Receiver", an Acoustic Research "Amplifier", and an Acoustic Research "FM Tuner". While these are some of my MOST cherished audio possessions, not for one moment have I deluded myself into thinking these can compete with other rigs/equipment I have.
  • debussyj
    debussyj Posts: 198
    edited November 2010
    I have a classic Marantz Model 22 receiver in my bedroom setup driving a pair of classic Polk RT-5 bookshelf speakers. The sound is very warm and sweet with lots of bottom end and punch. It's amazing what these older receivers can do. They were so elegant, mine glows blue with that classic gyro AM/FM tuner wheel. It's a great tuner too. I remember drooling over these when I was a kid wanting one and my parents saying "right" no way. So I bought this one a couple of years ago. Really love it.
  • TroyD
    TroyD Posts: 13,077
    edited November 2010
    Since seeing one and hearing about it from El Roma, I've always wanted the Advent receiver.....

    BDT
    I plan for the future. - F1Nut