The Thing prequel (movie stills)
Ron-P
Posts: 8,520
If...
Ron dislikes a film = go out and buy it.
Ron loves a film = don't even rent.
Ron dislikes a film = go out and buy it.
Ron loves a film = don't even rent.
Post edited by Ron-P on
Comments
-
The Thing is still one of the best horror movies of all time in my book. It had the classic scenes where the CGI was grainy, the bloody flowed like wine, and the stop-motion was awesome! They won't be able to make it better but, they had better be respectful of the original!
Long live Kurt Russel and his trusty flame-thrower!!Where’s the KABOOM?!?! There’s supposed to be an Earth shattering KABOOM!!! -
Actually that "original" was a remake of the original 1950's or 60's film, which I always thought was superior to the Kurt Russell remake.Music and Movie Rig
Samsung 40" HDTV 1080p
LSi25 Front Speakers
LSiC Center Channel
LSiFX Surrounds
Rotel RB 1080 2-Channel Amp
NAD T763 Reciever
Denon DVD 2900 Universal Player
Audiosource 10 Band Digital Equalizer
Audioquest CV-8 speaker cables
Audioquest Sub-X subwoofer cables
Audioquest King Cobra Interconnects
Monster AVS 2000 Voltage Stabilizer
Playstation 3 120GB Slim -
1951, and it is a good one. But, I still favor the Kurt film.If...
Ron dislikes a film = go out and buy it.
Ron loves a film = don't even rent. -
The Thing in '51 was James Arnes first movie role. Remember him from the old TV series Gunsmoke. He played Marshal Dillion and in the Thing, he was the Thing. I was 9 at the time and it was one scary movie and in BW.My 2012 HT Room - http://www.avsforum.com/t/1416077/bsoko2-new-ht-june-2012
-
The Thing is still one of the best horror movies of all time in my book. It had the classic scenes where the CGI was grainy, the bloody flowed like wine, and the stop-motion was awesome! They won't be able to make it better but, they had better be respectful of the original!
Long live Kurt Russel and his trusty flame-thrower!!
Where the CGI was grainy? WHAT CGI? John Carpenter's film used all practical effects. Hell, even that opening credit was done by setting fire to a garbage bag behind a smoke-filled backlit fish tank!
The Thing is seriously the shining example of why practical effects will always look more realistic than CGI. In my opinion, no computer has come close to accomplishing what Rick Baker did with the creature effects in that movie.Equipment list:
Onkyo TX-NR3010 9.2 AVR
Emotiva XPA-3 amp
Polk RTi70 mains, CSi40 center, RTi38 surrounds, RTi28 rears and heights
SVS 20-39CS+ subwoofer powered by Crown XLS1500
Oppo BDP-93 Blu-ray player
DarbeeVision DVP5000 video processor
Epson 8500UB 1080p projector
Elite Screens Sable 120" CineWhite screen -
Where the CGI was grainy? WHAT CGI? John Carpenter's film used all practical effects.
DAH!....you are absolutely correct. I stand/sit corrected
I guess i need to get myself a bluray copy as my VHS is probably where i am getting "GRAINY" from. OFF TO BB!Where’s the KABOOM?!?! There’s supposed to be an Earth shattering KABOOM!!! -
kuntasensei wrote: »
The Thing is seriously the shining example of why practical effects will always look more realistic than CGI. In my opinion, no computer has come close to accomplishing what Rick Baker did with the creature effects in that movie.If...
Ron dislikes a film = go out and buy it.
Ron loves a film = don't even rent. -
To this day, I'm stiff confounded by the sfx of Thing and the original Alien.I refuse to argue with idiots, because people can't tell the DIFFERENCE!