Nike+?

audiobliss
audiobliss Posts: 12,518
edited September 2010 in The Clubhouse
I've started running recently and have definitely gotten to the point that I'm sure I'm going to stick with it. Last week I jogged 5.7 miles Tuesday then went out and jogged 9.38 miles Thursday. Now, I'm not going to do that again for quite a while, as I've realized how stupid it is for me to go out for so long without first getting more acclimated to running. At any rate, that's not the point of this thread...

I've been tracking my routes on google maps with the satellite view to figure out my distances, which works fine, but I'd really prefer to have something a little simpler, perhaps more accurate, and that will keep record of my runs. I have an iPod touch that of course has the Nike+ preinstalled on it, but I don't have a sensor and have never played with it. But I've been reading about it a bit today and am interested in it. I don't listen to music when I run usually and don't really want to have to carry my iPod with me, so I noticed the Nike+ sport band that I can just wear as a watch to sync with the sensor and computer.

Anybody use Nike+ for tracking their runs? Is the Sport Band any good? Seems like the perfect solution for me. Well, ideally I'd like to have something that will track it by GPS (like my friend's Droid will do), but I don't have anything with that capability and won't for a while. So this seems like the next best thing.

However, is it accurate and reliable? I was reading some reviews about them, and some users have reported that it's not very accurate if you're running at different paces. For example, when I run by myself currently I'm jogging at about a 8:48/mile pace (working on it!), but I'm also jogging with some friends a few times a week, and we go much slower. I don't want it to suddenly become inaccurate because it was calibrated to one pace but not the other.

So, any input on Nike's system? Or other alternatives?

Thanks!!!


EDIT - And also, if you use the Nike+ solution, what do you use to attach the sensor to your shoes? I love my Brooks and am not interested in switching to wearing Nikes.
Jstas wrote: »
Simple question. If you had a cool million bucks, what would you do with it?
Wonder WTF happened to the rest of my money.
In Use
PS3, Yamaha CDR-HD1300, Plex, Amazon Fire TV Gen 2
Pioneer Elite VSX-52, Parasound HCA-1000A
Klipsch RF-82ii, RC-62ii, RS-42ii, RW-10d
Epson 8700UB

In Storage
[Home Audio]
Rotel RCD-02, Yamaha KX-W900U, Sony ST-S500ES, Denon DP-7F
Pro-Ject Phono Box MKII, Parasound P/HP-850, ASL Wave 20 monoblocks
Klipsch RF-35, RB-51ii

[Car Audio]
Pioneer Premier DEH-P860MP, Memphis 16-MCA3004, Boston Acoustic RC520
Post edited by audiobliss on

Comments

  • wayne3burk
    wayne3burk Posts: 939
    edited September 2010
    before i got my nike shoes i had the sensor inserted in a little bit of something (like a little pocket that was sewn in around the top of my tennis shoe). I think you could make a nike sensor sock and lace your shoe lace through it. The place that it fits into in a nike shoe is a recess cut in the shape of the sensor that fits below the instep insert, i.e. in the top of the sole of the shoe. I suppose in theory for every inch above the ground that the sensor is the somewhat less accurate it will be - as it is probably measuring the distance between your strides. I would try to attach it to the laces between the first pair of eyelets.

    yeah thats the ticket

    http://nikerunning.nike.com/nikeos/p/nikeplus/en_US/plus/#//runs/history/1621389469/
    Yamaha RX-V2700, EMI 711As (front), RCA K-16 (rear), Magnavox Console (Center & TV Stand), Sony SMP-N200 media streamer, Dual 1249 TT =--- Sharp Aquas 60" LCD tellie
  • shawn474
    shawn474 Posts: 3,047
    edited September 2010
    I have it; it's ok. I tried keeping track and getting all scientific and I felt as though it took the fun out of it. Some days I feel like going farther, faster, etc.; some days I don't. It's all about just getting outside and enjoying the me time with nothing else to worry about. I realize that others are way more serious about it than I am. I have heard of people using their Ipods, handheld gps, etc. One is no better than the other in my opinion if all you are doing is calculating route, miles, mph, etc. The sensor goes under the insoles in the sole of the shoe.

    Shawn
    Shawn
    AVR: Marantz SR-5011
    Center Channel: Polk LsiM706c
    Front: Polk LsiM703
    Rear: LSI fx
    Subwoofer: SVS 20-39pci
    Television: Samsung UN58NU7100FXZA
    DVD Player: Sony PS4
  • bigaudiofanatic
    bigaudiofanatic Posts: 4,415
    edited September 2010
    Do not do what I did buy the sensor but do not put it under your laces I lost mine in 45 seconds after starting to run. Put it in your shoe or buy a adapter to hold it. I would of kept on running if I still had mine. Will get another one soon.
    HT setup
    Panasonic 50" TH-50PZ80U
    Denon DBP-1610
    Monster HTS 1650
    Carver A400X :cool:
    MIT Exp 3 Speaker Wire
    Kef 104/2
    URC MX-780 Remote
    Sonos Play 1

    Living Room
    63 inch Samsung PN63C800YF
    Polk Surroundbar 3000
    Samsung BD-C7900
  • cstmar01
    cstmar01 Posts: 4,424
    edited September 2010
    for cardio tracking for me it was a great tool. I got the Nike shoes with the pocket in the sole for it and it worked great. I hate treadmills with a passion and often they can be different in terms of timing than what you really are running so I found it to be a great tool when using it.