Amp power ratings.

rubin
rubin Posts: 565
edited September 2010 in 2 Channel Audio
Some amps are in IHF others RMS,is there a difference. Is one more accurate than the other.
Post edited by rubin on

Comments

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,566
    edited September 2010
    The peak to peak amps rating matters more.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited September 2010
    Someone who can type faster than me will give a better (more accurate) answer, but of course there is a difference. Otherwise, why have two different values for the same thing. The context is more important that the value.

    Accuracy is a floating term, it could mean many things in audio, In addition to power, regardless of how they are stated (IHF, RMS, ?), there are other measurements that are equally valid, and maybe even more important. Of course, there is probably more than one way to measure and report the results. For example, frequency response, distortion, and power over a range is important, which, I think is part of the RMS vaue.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • rubin
    rubin Posts: 565
    edited September 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    The peak to peak amps rating matters more.

    Could you explain that rating. I've never seen that.
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 50,566
    edited September 2010
    It is also referred to as current. The higher, the better.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • rubin
    rubin Posts: 565
    edited September 2010
    F1nut wrote: »
    It is also referred to as current. The higher, the better.

    Ok now I get it.
  • megasat16
    megasat16 Posts: 3,521
    edited September 2010
    IHF = Institute of High Fidelity (An Organization which defines guidelines for testing power amplifiers performance, they have established graphs such as A, B, C weightings). It's believed to be more accurate way to measure and quote amplifiers' performance since not all 300W power amps perform the same.

    Heck, we need to start reading these IHF in the SPECs but only a very handful manufacturer will provide IHF power for their amps.

    RMS = Root of the Means of the Square is the mathematical function derived to calculate the output voltage, current, power of the amplifier based on the measured waveforms. It's more Universal method of quoting amplifier power.

    If you want to know in details, http://www.eznec.com/Amateur/RMS_Power.pdf
    Trying out Different Audio Cables is a Religious Affair. You don't discuss it with anyone. :redface::biggrin: