Monitor 50 vs 60 for HT?

blah325
blah325 Posts: 2
edited September 2010 in Speakers
Can anyone help me quantify the difference between the Monitor 50 vs Monitor 60 when used for HT?

This would be with a CS1 center, Onkyo 606 and 14x20 room.

Any difference in clarity at low volumes?

Thanks in advance.
Post edited by blah325 on

Comments

  • packetjones
    packetjones Posts: 1,059
    edited September 2010
    Obviously the 60's have another driver. I would recommend the 60's myself. To be honest I have not heard wither of the speakers but the 60's get a lot of praise around here. There are not as many people with the 50's.
    Front - RTiA5's
    Rear - RTiA3's
    Center - CSiA4
    Sub - PSW110
  • disneyjoe7
    disneyjoe7 Posts: 11,435
    edited September 2010
    Larger is always (almost) better IMHO.

    Speakers
    Carver Amazing Fronts
    CS400i Center
    RT800i's Rears
    Sub Paradigm Servo 15

    Electronics
    Conrad Johnson PV-5 pre-amp
    Parasound Halo A23
    Pioneer 84TXSi AVR
    Pioneer 79Avi DVD
    Sony CX400 CD changer
    Panasonic 42-PX60U Plasma
    WMC Win7 32bit HD DVR


  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited September 2010
    The main difference you will hear is in two channel. You can get by with M50s if you use a CS2 for your center and get a good sub to handle everything below 80hz?

    By getting the larger center you address the most important surround channel--which carries over 50 percent of your sound in HT! And the sub picks up what would normally be gained by a move to the M60s if it's tight and powerful enough.

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]