What crossovers are these?

thejck
thejck Posts: 849
edited September 2010 in Vintage Speakers
What crossovers are these? I was under the impression that they were 1.2's because they had the pin/blade cable but the crossovers look like the originals unless I am mistaken.
Post edited by thejck on
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    My crossover look like this and they also have the pin/blade cable
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,254
    edited September 2010
    They are the SDA SRS originals..
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »
    They are the SDA SRS originals..

    With the pin/blade connectors? I guess so much for that foolproof method of checking.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,254
    edited September 2010
    That is odd, but could be a later model when they went to change things or someone changed them out.. I have 2 sets of them here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tony M
    Tony M Posts: 11,152
    edited September 2010
    The originals came with those massive caps?
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • michaeljhsda2
    michaeljhsda2 Posts: 2,184
    edited September 2010
    thejck wrote: »
    What crossovers are these? I was under the impression that they were 1.2's because they had the pin/blade cable but the crossovers look like the originals unless I am mistaken.

    Did those come out of the 1.2's that you just bought? Seems very unlikely they are as you have a pin/blade IC. Those are from the original SRS (blade/blade) not 1.2's IMO.
    SDA SRS 2.3TL's
    Silk Audio MS-90-BT integrated tube amp
    Yaqin MS-20L integrated tube amp
    SDA 2B TL's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • michaeljhsda2
    michaeljhsda2 Posts: 2,184
    edited September 2010
    thejck wrote: »
    My crossover look like this and they also have the pin/blade cable

    That's very similar to what my 1.2TL's looked like before I upgraded the xovers (not a 1.2 to 1.2 TL conversion btw).
    SDA SRS 2.3TL's
    Silk Audio MS-90-BT integrated tube amp
    Yaqin MS-20L integrated tube amp
    SDA 2B TL's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    tony millard wrote: »
    The originals came with those massive caps?

    Those are not the orginal caps. They have been upgraded by Maybe Ben. That is the set that my neighbor picked up from Nekashi
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    michaeljhsda2 wrote: »
    Did those come out of the 1.2's that you just bought? Seems very unlikely they are as you have a pin/blade IC. Those are from the original SRS (blade/blade) not 1.2's IMO.

    Those are my neighbors. He also has the pin/blade inter. We went over to Oklohoma City to buy them from Nekashi.
    I assumed they were the 1.2 because of the pin blade cable. However when we opened them up we were surprised.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • michaeljhsda2
    michaeljhsda2 Posts: 2,184
    edited September 2010
    thejck wrote: »
    Those are my neighbors. He also has the pin/blade inter. We went over to Oklohoma City to buy them from Nekashi.
    I assumed they were the 1.2 because of the pin blade cable. However when we opened them up we were surprised.

    Surprised is right! Someone did major surgery on your neighbors xovers to make them TL's. On the other hand, converting yours to TL's won't be as involving IMO.
    SDA SRS 2.3TL's
    Silk Audio MS-90-BT integrated tube amp
    Yaqin MS-20L integrated tube amp
    SDA 2B TL's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    michaeljhsda2 wrote: »
    Surprised is right! Someone did major surgery on your neighbors xovers to make them TL's. On the other hand, converting yours to TL's won't be as involving IMO.

    Well I knew they were not TL's since they had the rdo194's. However I thought they were at least 1.2's since they had the pin/blade.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • michaeljhsda2
    michaeljhsda2 Posts: 2,184
    edited September 2010
    Right, they're not 1.2 TL's...very interesting upgrade.
    SDA SRS 2.3TL's
    Silk Audio MS-90-BT integrated tube amp
    Yaqin MS-20L integrated tube amp
    SDA 2B TL's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    Why is it that the original SRS had such hugh crossovers compared to the 1.2's and 1.2 TL's?

    Those are solen caps on the modified crossover and they are hugh
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Toolfan66
    Toolfan66 Posts: 17,254
    edited September 2010
    You "CANNOT" tl the Original SRS's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • thejck
    thejck Posts: 849
    edited September 2010
    TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »
    You "CANNOT" tl the Original SRS's

    Yup saw that already.
    Feel really bad for Robert (neighbor) because I was the one that made the assumption that they were 1.2's and never thought to ask what they really were. Even though when I go back and look at the for sale thread there was no mention that they are 1.2's. I guess the pin/blade cable threw me off.
    Feel kinda stupid. I have learned a lot about this speaker in the last 2 months.

    I guess once I get mine up to 1.2 "TL" status he can give them a listen and see what the difference is.
    What should he expect to listen for. I know the originals are said to have more bass. He already has the rdo194 tweeters so that should not make a hugh diff.
    Plus his speakers are 4 ohms and not 6.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter