For those with both the remastered mono and stereo Beatles albums

pmckeealaska
pmckeealaska Posts: 808
edited February 2011 in Music & Movies
Which do you prefer? Which sound better to you in terms of audio quality? I've spent a lot of time listening to both versions of all their albums and I can say that from a sound quality standpoint, the stereo remasters sound better, while, for some albums, the monos are more enjoyable to listen to. I grew up with hearing the Beatles on stereo vinyl in the 70's and 80's and so, for me, the mono verions had some suprising differences in the mixes and for some albums (especially for Pepper) they are almost totally different listening experiences. I'd have to say that I might never listen to Pepper in stereo again after hearing the mono version...it's just a far superior mix in my opinion and I can see why Lennon said "you havent really heard Pepper until you've heard it in mono". Also, the mono versions just seem to have more umph, more balls to them, though they sometimes seem to be coming through a cheesecloth! Abbey Road remastered is simply a revelation and easily the best of the stereo remasters, though this is easy to understand as it was the first album to be released without a mono version. At any rate, it has been a real treat to listen to these classics the way the Beatles intended. Thoughts?
Music and Movie Rig

Samsung 40" HDTV 1080p
LSi25 Front Speakers
LSiC Center Channel
LSiFX Surrounds
Rotel RB 1080 2-Channel Amp
NAD T763 Reciever
Denon DVD 2900 Universal Player

Audiosource 10 Band Digital Equalizer
Audioquest CV-8 speaker cables
Audioquest Sub-X subwoofer cables
Audioquest King Cobra Interconnects

Monster AVS 2000 Voltage Stabilizer
Playstation 3 120GB Slim
Post edited by pmckeealaska on

Comments

  • carvcom
    carvcom Posts: 240
    edited August 2010
    Hey Alaska, thanks for that mini review!!
    Honestly, I have been waiting for a deal on the stereo box set, never even considered the mono version.
    Now, I will keep an eye out for either, & eventually, I'm sure, both.
  • eeagle
    eeagle Posts: 226
    edited September 2010
    I like the ST version best.

    For the real collector don't forget the USB Apple (limited edition).
    SDA SRS 1.2
    Adcom GFA-5802
    Adcom GFP-750
    Sony DVP-NS999ES
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited September 2010
    Hello,
    Very interesting! In order to play the Beatles USB through their audio system a person would need an outboard D/A converter, correct? Or, into a computer and then use line level outputs from the computer?
    Regards, Ken
  • eeagle
    eeagle Posts: 226
    edited September 2010
    Hello,
    Very interesting! In order to play the Beatles USB through their audio system a person would need an outboard D/A converter, correct? Or, into a computer and then use line level outputs from the computer?
    Regards, Ken

    Or just plug it into a SqueezeBox Touch which could take full advantage of the 24bit flac files. One could benefit further from the many external DAC's available, but most feel the Touch DAC, a AKM4420, 44.1k, 48k & 96k, performs quite well.
    SDA SRS 1.2
    Adcom GFA-5802
    Adcom GFP-750
    Sony DVP-NS999ES
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 7,658
    edited September 2010
    Thanks Eeagle,
    I don't mean to be too dense, but is the Beatles thing a limited deal? In other words, can the same sound quality be downloaded via another source? Or, do I need to get on the stick if I want to get it?
    Thanks, Ken
  • eeagle
    eeagle Posts: 226
    edited September 2010
    I picked up the apple more as a collectors item; and that is what is limited. Interestingly the Beatles originally recorded on that label, which used the Apple logo long before Steve Jobs picked it up.

    The 24bit tracks are noticeably better than the 16 bit found on the Mono and Stereo CD album sets, and I would suspect the tracks will become available from some download sites like HDtracks at some point; or as 24 bit individual albums; currently though the USB apple seems to be the only marketed source.
    SDA SRS 1.2
    Adcom GFA-5802
    Adcom GFP-750
    Sony DVP-NS999ES
  • pmckeealaska
    pmckeealaska Posts: 808
    edited September 2010
    Interesting to hear about the USB collection being at 24bit. I'd imagine it would sound better. I pretty much got both box sets as a first day buy since I'm a fanatic. I'm pleased with the sound quality of the remastered stereo albums compared to my original 80's era CD's. For me the mono box set was bought as a collectors item and to hear mixes of albums and songs I had never heard before now. For me, the mono Pepper and Revolver make it worth the purchase, even though I think the remastered stereo version are better in terms of sound quality. I suppose if their albums are ever released in SACD or DVD-A I might feel like I wasted my $$$, but to this point I'm very happy with my purchases. It would be nice to hear the USB collection though. I wonder why they didnt release the mono albums that way as well? There are many would have paid $500 or more to have both!
    Music and Movie Rig

    Samsung 40" HDTV 1080p
    LSi25 Front Speakers
    LSiC Center Channel
    LSiFX Surrounds
    Rotel RB 1080 2-Channel Amp
    NAD T763 Reciever
    Denon DVD 2900 Universal Player

    Audiosource 10 Band Digital Equalizer
    Audioquest CV-8 speaker cables
    Audioquest Sub-X subwoofer cables
    Audioquest King Cobra Interconnects

    Monster AVS 2000 Voltage Stabilizer
    Playstation 3 120GB Slim
  • Norm Apter
    Norm Apter Posts: 1,036
    edited September 2010
    I've got the Mono Box and each individual stereo CD from Rubber Soul onward, plus A Hard Day's Night and Beatles for Sale.

    My favorite stereo CD is Beatles for Sale for sound quality. The stereo version of that one just sounds phenomenal.

    I tend to prefer Rubber Soul and Revolver in mono. Peppers and The White Album are much closer (in terms of mono vs. stereo) but I'd probably go with the stereo on those if push came to shove (but I'm glad I have both).
    2 Ch.
    Parasound Halo A23 Amp
    Parasound Halo P3 Preamp
    Parasound Halo T3 Tuner
    Bada HD22SE tube CD Player
    Magnum Dynalab Signal Sleuth
    Magnum Dynalab ST-2 antenna
    polkaudio Lsi9s (upgraded cross-overs)
    MIT Shotgun S-3 Bi-wire Interface Speaker Cables
    MIT Shotgun S-3 Interconnects (3)
    IegO L70530 Power cords (3)

    HT
    Denon 2808ci AVR
    polkaudio RTi A5s (fronts)
    polkaudio RTi A1s (rears)
    polkaudio Csi A6 (center)
    Signal Cable Ultra Speaker Cables
    Signal Cable Analog II Interconnects
  • headrott
    headrott Posts: 5,496
    edited September 2010
    Norm Apter wrote: »
    I've got the Mono Box and each individual stereo CD from Rubber Soul onward, plus A Hard Day's Night and Beatles for Sale.

    My favorite stereo CD is Beatles for Sale for sound quality. The stereo version of that one just sounds phenomenal.

    I tend to prefer Rubber Soul and Revolver in mono. Peppers and The White Album are much closer (in terms of mono vs. stereo) but I'd probably go with the stereo on those if push came to shove (but I'm glad I have both).

    Did you listen to the Stereo mix of Rubber Soul on the mono CD? It blows away the re-mixed stereo version on the stereo CD (IMO). The tones are so much better on the original stereo Rubber Soul on the mono Rubber Soul CD. If you have not heard it, listen to it and let us know what you think.

    Greg
    Relayer-Big-O-Poster.jpg
    Taken from a recent Audioholics reply regarding "Club Polk" and Polk speakers:
    "I'm yet to hear a Polk speaker that merits more than a sentence and 60 seconds discussion." :\
    My response is: If you need 60 seconds to respond in one sentence, you probably should't be evaluating Polk speakers.....


    "Green leaves reveal the heart spoken Khatru"- Jon Anderson

    "Have A Little Faith! And Everything You'll Face, Will Jump From Out Right On Into Place! Yeah! Take A Little Time! And Everything You'll Find, Will Move From Gloom Right On Into Shine!"- Arthur Lee
  • TomWhite
    TomWhite Posts: 6
    edited February 2011
    eeagle wrote: »
    I picked up the apple more as a collectors item; and that is what is limited. Interestingly the Beatles originally recorded on that label, which used the Apple logo long before Steve Jobs picked it up.

    The 24bit tracks are noticeably better than the 16 bit found on the Mono and Stereo CD album sets, and I would suspect the tracks will become available from some download sites like HDtracks at some point; or as 24 bit individual albums; currently though the USB apple seems to be the only marketed source.

    I know I'm late to the party, but I just found this thread. To correct the above, Apple Corp. was not even around when The Beatles fist recorded. It was (is) a level created by them, for their own use, and for selected other artists. As examples, James Taylor had his first record on Apple, as did Mary Hopkins.

    In the US, prior to signing a deal with Capitol Records, The Beatles had a couple singles released on some minor labels. Love Me Do/P. S. I Love You was released on Tollie Records, while Please, Please Me/From Me To You was released on VeeJay Records.