Passive radiator phase question

jimbo1421
jimbo1421 Posts: 772
edited June 2010 in Vintage Speakers
Hello,

This question has bugged me for awhile. If one does the press test on a midwoofer the passive radiator is pushed out by the air pressure. So when the MW is pulled inward in response to an audio signal the passive radiator is pushed out, right? Does this mean that it is out of phase with the MW? If so, does it matter at all that it is not in phase? Inquiring minds want to know.

Regards,

Jim
5.1 System:
TCL R613 55" 4K
Front: SRS-3.1TL
Center: CS400i
Surround: Monitor 10B
PSW10 subwoofer
Onkyo PR-SC886P Pre/Pro
NAD T955 5 channel power amplifier
Technics SL-1710 MK2 turntable
Audio-Technica AT14Sa cartridge
Parasound P3 pre-amp
Oppo BDP-103 Blu-Ray
2014 MacBook Pro 2.8 GHz

2.0 Office System:
Monitor 10A (Peerless)
Outlaw 1050 receiver
Parasound HCA-1000A power amp
MacPro
Post edited by jimbo1421 on

Comments

  • MillerLiteScott
    MillerLiteScott Posts: 2,561
    edited June 2010
    This has also bugged me. But after noodling it through a little knowing that a PR is an expensive port. If I understand it correctly with my little brain, what the PR is doing is reflecting the back side excursion of the active woofer similar to the port is venting the back side excursion of the active woofer in a ported design.

    Am I correct?

    Scott
    I like speakers that are bigger than a small refrigerator but smaller than a big refrigerator:D
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,649
    edited June 2010
    jimbo1421 wrote: »
    Does this mean that it is out of phase with the MW? If so, does it matter at all that it is not in phase?
    As with a port it will be in phase with the driver over a small range of frequencies above their tuning point,then progressively going out of phase with the midbass below that.
  • skrol
    skrol Posts: 3,393
    edited June 2010
    A related thought ...
    I have wondered about time / phase delays between the MW's vs the PR in arrangements like the RTA11TL. For example, the top MW is farther away from the PRs than the bottom MW. Configurations like the Monitor 10 would not have an issue as both PRs are equal distances from the PR.
    Stan
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Benchmark DAC1, Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i; Technics SL-J2, Parasound PPH-100.

    HT:
    Marantz SR7010, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW110 , Marantz UD5005, Pioneer PL-530, Panasonic TC-P42S60

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-835R, AVR-888, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, 5B, TSi100, RM7, PSW10 (DXi104 upgrade); Pioneer: CT-6R; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, CDR-615; Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii, Sony CDP-650ESD, Technics SA 5070, B&W DM601
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,649
    edited June 2010
    skrol wrote: »
    A related thought ...
    I have wondered about time / phase delays between the MW's vs the PR in arrangements like the RTA11TL. For example, the top MW is farther away from the PRs than the bottom MW. Configurations like the Monitor 10 would not have an issue as both PRs are equal distances from the PR.
    Stan
    Relative location of the midbass's wouldn't matter as the PR is excited by their combined back wave or pressure.
  • FTGV
    FTGV Posts: 3,649
    edited June 2010
    Here is some good info regarding PR's.http://www.aespeakers.com/PRFAQ.php
  • yepimonfire
    yepimonfire Posts: 256
    edited June 2010
    there was a really good illustration on how this works, but i forget where to find it. no it is not out of phase whatsoever. above the tuning frequency, the port does not pick up the energy, the woofer does, at the tuning frequency, the woofer barely moves as the energy is directed to the port, below the tuning frequency, the driver behaves as if it is out of the box, which causes ported and passive radiator cabinets to have an extremely steep roll-off below the tuning. a sealed box with LF extension of 40hz will drop at about 3-6dB an octave where-as a ported one drops 12-24 dB an octave and eventually has no useful output below a certain octave. for example my PSW10 is tuned at about 35hz, at 30hz the driver produce only a slightly audible sound and it vibrates erratically, below 30hz there is absolutely no audible output and the driver unloads. i had a sealed KEF sub once that had a -3dB response to 35hz but it would play audibly at 15hz (i am still young enough to hear 15hz) ports are a trade off but they gain an extra octave at least. if my PSW10's driver was loaded in a sealed box it would probably roll off at 45hz.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,217
    edited June 2010
    FTGV wrote: »
    Here is some good info regarding PR's.http://www.aespeakers.com/PRFAQ.php

    Great link; adding it to my favorites.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Pangea AC14SE MKII | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node 3 - Tubes add soul!