SDA SRS passive driver 15" value
snow
Posts: 4,337
I have a pair of 15" passive drivers that will work in all the big SDA SRS models but I am on the fence about selling them for a couple of reasons first off I dont know what their value is, secondy if I do sell them should I offer them as a pair or should I sell them to two seperate inviduals so two people can have a spare? If I can get some ideas on value I may put them up for sale in the FM area.
REGARDS SNOW
REGARDS SNOW
Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all
Post edited by snow on
Comments
-
I'm not sure but can i have first dibs on them??Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎
SVS SB16 X2
Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified
VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM
MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s -
Snow if these have the weights on the back I really want them as mine don't have them.Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎
SVS SB16 X2
Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified
VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM
MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s -
TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »I'm not sure but can i have first dibs on them??
Actually im not sure if I can offer dibs on something that isnt for sale yet
It's going to be 15 mins or so before I get pics up my battery is dead in my Camera
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
Set up an auction and go with the highest bid.
-
Set up an auction and go with the highest bid.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
I'm interested in purchasing them, as well. Good luck and let us know what the options are.
-
Not the ones I am looking for Snow.
Thanks and good luck with the sale.
Larry.Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎
SVS SB16 X2
Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified
VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM
MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s -
TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »Not the ones I am looking for Snow.
Thanks and good luck with the sale.
Larry.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
I think 3, yours are from the originals.Polk Audio SDA 2.3tl Fully Hot Rodded. 😎
SVS SB16 X2
Cary SLP-05/Ultimate Upgrade.
Cary SA-500.1 ES Amps
Cary DMS 800PV Network
OPPO UDP 205/ModWright Modification
VPI Scout TT / Dynavector 20x2
Jolida JD9 Fully Modified
VPI MW-1 Cyclone RCM
MIT Shotgun 3 cables throughout / Except TT, and PC’s -
Well, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all
-
Well 100 views and no ideas..... I guess it's off to the FM with these then. From what little I know about the 15" passive radiators they are all identical in all 3 models except for the use of slugs or other weights.
They all are marked SW150 and can be used in all the big SDA's. What sound difference you would achieve with or without the weights im not sure. I know some people say the bass is deeper on the original SDA SRS but I dont know if the use of these metal slugs would have anything to do with it or not.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
TOOLFORLIFEFAN wrote: »I think 3, yours are from the originals.
DarqueKnight/ RayHi
The SW150 was used in
1. The 1986 blade/blade version of the SRS II.
2. The original SRS.
3. The SRS 1.2.
4. The SRS 1.2TL.
Your SW150's look just like the ones in my SRS's, but different from the ones in my 1.2TL's. You can see a pic of my 1.2TL PR here:
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74306
I think that as time progressed, polk used some different materials and a different metal counter weight for the SW150, but the acoustic performance properties remained the same. Otherwise, I think they would have used a different part number as they did with the SL2000/RD0194 and SL3000/RD0198 tweeters.
F1nut/ Jesse-Probably just refinements in the PR build, but that's a guess. Considering that they all share the same part number, I've got to think they sound the same in the end. On the other hand, the SRS's definitely produce what seems to be more bass, although it could just be the tuning and has nothing to do with the PR.
REGARDS SNOWWell, I just pulled off the impossible by doing a double-blind comparison all by myself, purely by virtue of the fact that I completely and stupidly forgot what I did last. I guess that getting old does have its advantages after all -
My SRS1.2s (only a few SN's apart) have a mix. One is like the PR on the left and the other is like the one on the right. I have swapped them and can't tell any difference.'65 427 Shelby Cobra
'72 Triumph TR-6
__________________
'88 Polk SDA SRS 1.2, with upgraded XO caps and Erse SDA inductors
'86 Polk SDA CRS+
'84 Polk Monitor 10A (Peerless tweeters)
'05 HSU VTF-3 Sub (Original OEM)
'20 HSU VTF-3 Sub (three more, 100% cloned)
'93 Carver TFM-35
'88 Carver M-1.0t
'88 Adcom GFT-555
'88 Adcom GFP-555
'88 Adcom GFA-555 (upgraded/restored)
'88 Adcom GFA-555 (a second one upgraded/restored)
'05 Onkyo DV-555 media
'89 Fosgate 360 Digital Space Matrix
'89 Fosgate 360 Digital Space Matrix, internal surround amp bridged to drive only a center channel
'91 Kenwood Basic M1D Amp
'89 Pioneer Laser Disc media
'89 Sony SuperBeta HiFi media
One PGA2310 based custom built remote volume control
Four Polk T-15's
Four Polk TSi-200's
Four Polk TSi-100's
Two Polk CS-10's