Rockford T2 vs Polk
Vital
Posts: 747
Got an email from Rockford on their new version of T1 - T2.
I never had any experience with either or but would like to possibly give them a shot.
From what i understand T1 and now T2 is Rockford's top line, if so how do they compare to Polk either MM or SR?
Here's a link to T2 line btw:
http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/newsletter/assets/volume/2010_06_PowerT2.asp
I never had any experience with either or but would like to possibly give them a shot.
From what i understand T1 and now T2 is Rockford's top line, if so how do they compare to Polk either MM or SR?
Here's a link to T2 line btw:
http://www.rockfordfosgate.com/newsletter/assets/volume/2010_06_PowerT2.asp
2008 Nissan Altima
Kenwood DNX 5140
Arc Audio IDX and XEQ
Polk Audio SR6500 active and SR124-dvc sealed
Polk Audio PA500.4 and PA1200.1
Kenwood DNX 5140
Arc Audio IDX and XEQ
Polk Audio SR6500 active and SR124-dvc sealed
Polk Audio PA500.4 and PA1200.1
Post edited by Vital on
Comments
-
I have a hard time getting enthused about any speakers or subwoofers from RF, especially compared to Polk SRs. I haven't heard the new MM series, but I would expect the db series to sound better than the RF offerings.
Give them a demo and report back with your listening impressions. -
Metal mids have a tendency to 'ring' around 4khz, if you plan running these active. Metal tweets are normally very bright.
The sound would be very different from the more balanced sound from the Polk MM line. The SR's are in a different league.