Monitor 5b's x-over upgrade w/pics

13567

Comments

  • foxhounds2
    foxhounds2 Posts: 16
    edited April 2007
    I already used a couple of these dome tweeters in my model 10's. They are a drop in for the originals with no mods needed. They sound fabulous.
    Jon Fox
    Life without music would be very bland, imagine not being able to hear. Protect your ears!!!:(
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    foxhounds2 wrote: »
    I already used a couple of these dome tweeters in my model 10's. They are a drop in for the originals with no mods needed. They sound fabulous.

    I installed mine last night. Again, no mods needed, they fit perfectly. The screw holes match. If I didnt know any better, I would think it was the same tweeter, just without the exposed "v" style leads. The sound quality is very close to the peerless, but it is alittle more efficient. So with minor Eq adjustments or very minor crossover adjustments, I think it would be identical to the peerless. But as for just a drop in replacement with no mods, it works excellent.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    Well, I’ve had some time to get the new tweets and x-over broken in as well as some decent listening time. All I can say is, “I have a big fat grin from ear to ear”. These speakers have been completely transformed. The RD0’s are every bit as good as everyone says. These are still lively on the top end and the vocals have a forwardness that put them right out front, but not in a cardboard cut-out type presentation.

    Vocals and upper frequencies are so smooth and effortless and not a hint of harshness or grain compared to the original tweeters. The depth for and aft is simply amazing. The soundstage is simply awesome and has so much realism when it’s in the recording; especially live piano. The natural tone and resonance can be startling.

    These are not bass mongers, the bass is tight and taught and very solid, but they don’t dig deep, probably not too much below about 45Hz., convincing nonetheless and, there is a naturalness to the bass that’s hard to explain. It doesn’t sound forced or like it’s trying to “fake” it, like many other inexpensive ported speakers. (my Athena AS-B1’s come to mind).

    It’s amazing how different these sound from my LSi 9’s, but at the same time I can now live with both of them. The 5b’s aren’t in the most listener friendly environment, but even so they sound remarkable. My 2 favorite audio adjectives now apply; completely open and effortless sound.

    I picked these up from dkg999 for $35. The cabinets have a few very minor chips on the back edges where the veneer meet the particle board, a few scratches on the bottom and the grills need to cleaned a bit, but overall they are a solid 7. I spent $48 for x-over parts and $102 for the new tweets. I sold the sl2000’s for a net of about $40 after shipping, so the total cost for these speakers is about $150. A complete and utter bargain for the sound these produce. Classic Polk sound doesn’t get any better than this.

    For the record here’s what I’m driving them with. It’s a PC based system in my office/computer room. Chaintech AV710 soundcard for its direct digital output capabilities; Harmonic Technologies-Sonic Impact glass toslink; AMC DAC-8 digital to analog converter; Yamaha AX-900U integrated rated at 130 wpc using the CD direct input. I use a program called Foobar to play regular cd’s and FLAC (lossless) files and yes, I play some mp3’s as well.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    Well congrates H9.

    Take a pic for up to see what the new tweets look like in the cabinets. You did say no modification was need when replaceing the sl2000 with the RDO's?
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    jakelm wrote: »
    Well congrates H9.

    Take a pic for up to see what the new tweets look like in the cabinets. You did say no modification was need when replaceing the sl2000 with the RDO's?

    Thanks, they really turned out well. I'll get some pics up. Yes, it's a straight forward drop in. Just remember to re-use the gasket from the old tweeter as the new ones don't come with the gasket.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • Tin_ear_fool
    Tin_ear_fool Posts: 9
    edited April 2007
    jakelm wrote: »
    I installed mine last night. Again, no mods needed, they fit perfectly. The screw holes match. If I didnt know any better, I would think it was the same tweeter, just without the exposed "v" style leads. The sound quality is very close to the peerless, but it is alittle more efficient. So with minor Eq adjustments or very minor crossover adjustments, I think it would be identical to the peerless. But as for just a drop in replacement with no mods, it works excellent.

    Just ordered a pair for my newly-acquired 1989 M5s. Do you think they're more efficient than the SL2000s I'm replacing? If so, would a 3 or 4 W resistor back down the efficiency, or just leave it as is?
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,661
    edited April 2007
    Just ordered a pair for my newly-acquired 1989 M5s. Do you think they're more efficient than the SL2000s I'm replacing? If so, would a 3 or 4 W resistor back down the efficiency, or just leave it as is?

    The replacement for the SL2000 is the RD0194-1 available from Polk. You do not want the MCM tweeter.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    Just ordered a pair for my newly-acquired 1989 M5s. Do you think they're more efficient than the SL2000s I'm replacing? If so, would a 3 or 4 W resistor back down the efficiency, or just leave it as is?



    I dont know about the comparison with the sl2000. But they are more efficient that the peerless.

    If you found they were too forward, then change increase the resistor by 1ohm, not neccessary to change the wattage of the resistor.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    Just do what F1 said..all will be good.

    I experimented with different tweeters. The RDO is the best replacement.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    Also I dont know if the MCM, is a drop in replacement for the sl2000. I thought the peerless and the 2000 were different sizes and shapes.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    Man, you are really messing with the original speaker. The MCM is probably not going to be a good fit for the later model monitor's. The peerless models and the later models had a different x-over and you are really changing the original. I'm not sure what you are going to get and just throwing parts on the x-over to compensate for something you're not even sure how it will sound.

    I'm all for experimenting but the RD0194-1 from Polk are the best ticket so far for the replacement of the sl1000 & sl2000 and the RD0198-1 for the sl2500. This is a tried and true replacement direct from the manufacturer. Upgrading the x-overs is also something I would highly recommend.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    But H9, my understanding is the new RDO194-1, does not fit in the same cutout as the peerless. I read here somewhere that the hole needs to be inlarged and the RDO194-1 does not fit air tight, like the peerless does. Or am I mistaken?

    To my knowledge, there is no excact tweeter replacement (in regaurds to fit and finish) for the peerless other than the MCM tweeter.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • Tin_ear_fool
    Tin_ear_fool Posts: 9
    edited April 2007
    Whew, thanks for the advice on the MCM no workie for the SL2000. Just called and they cancelled my order.
    Now, when I call CS, I just tell them I'm a ClubPolk member, and the price should be...? Of the 194-1, that is...
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    jakelm wrote: »
    But H9, my understanding is the new RDO194-1, does not fit in the same cutout as the peerless. I read here somewhere that the hole needs to be inlarged and the RDO194-1 does not fit air tight, like the peerless does. Or am I mistaken?

    To my knowledge, there is no excact tweeter replacement (in regaurds to fit and finish) for the peerless other than the MCM tweeter.

    I've been told that you can use the RD0194-1 but you need to use a Dremel tool to fabricate the opening. It's my understanding it's a very minimal procedure and I've never heard of it not fitting air tight. If for some reason it doesn't there are other very simple fixes. I know nothing about the MCM tweeter other than what has been mentioned here.

    H9

    EDIT: IMO, I would also change the x-over parts to correspond with the later x-over used with the sl200 tweeter. If you are not handy you could probably let it go with no ill effects to the sound. But, I would do the x-over if you can just to get it more correct.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    Whew, thanks for the advice on the MCM no workie for the SL2000. Just called and they cancelled my order.
    Now, when I call CS, I just tell them I'm a ClubPolk member, and the price should be...? Of the 194-1, that is...

    You are correct and to be safe I would mention the part number RD0194-1 just to be clear. Call and get Ken Swauger's extension and he'll set you up. $102 for a pair sent 2nd day (no charge for shipping). $48 x 2 plus tax.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • engtaz
    engtaz Posts: 7,669
    edited April 2007
    Everyone wants to be like you H9 LOL
    engtaz

    I love how music can brighten up a bad day.
  • schwarcw
    schwarcw Posts: 7,357
    edited April 2007
    H9,

    Thanks for sharing your experiences and the posts documenting your journey. There is a lot of interesting stuff that's of use to many Monitor 5 lovers. Great job! You are annointed the King of Monitor 5 mods!

    I will use your experience and energy to modify my Monitor 7's. I've done three set's of SDA's, but not a Monitor. This is one of the most fun parts of the hobby.
    Carl

  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    schwarcw wrote: »
    H9,

    Thanks for sharing your experiences and the posts documenting your journey. There is a lot of interesting stuff that's of use to many Monitor 5 lovers. Great job! You are annointed the King of Monitor 5 mods!

    I will use your experience and energy to modify my Monitor 7's. I've done three set's of SDA's, but not a Monitor. This is one of the most fun parts of the hobby.

    Thanks Carl, just trying to document it for others later on if they decide to do it. The Monitor series is as worthy as the SDA's for these upgrades. I think you will be very happy when you get done with your 7's. The only downside to the original Monitor series vs. todays speakers is the size. Because Polk used a passive radiator they had to make the cabinets rather large by today's standards. I wish these were a bit more compact, but overall i'm happy with them and I had fun doing it.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    LOL...Size matters H9.

    Upgrading my 7's was the most fun and most rewarding project I have ever done in electronics.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • Tin_ear_fool
    Tin_ear_fool Posts: 9
    edited April 2007
    Earlier in the thread there was a mention of Sonicaps, and H9 used Solen Fast Caps, and he's really enjoying the improvement. Now, I'm wondering if the M5 has sufficient enough component and build quality to appreciate the difference in sound going from the Solen (about $32 for 4 caps) to a Sonicap (about $116 for 4 caps) upgrade? Financially, it's a no-brainer. But, again, if we all had vast amounts of disposable income...
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    Earlier in the thread there was a mention of Sonicaps, and H9 used Solen Fast Caps, and he's really enjoying the improvement. Now, I'm wondering if the M5 has sufficient enough component and build quality to appreciate the difference in sound going from the Solen (about $32 for 4 caps) to a Sonicap (about $116 for 4 caps) upgrade? Financially, it's a no-brainer. But, again, if we all had vast amounts of disposable income...

    IMO...No the price difference is not worth the Sonicaps.

    If money was no object, then sure why not. But in my world , money is always a factor.
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,661
    edited April 2007
    IMO, the price difference and more importantly, the sound quality of the Sonicap's is absolutely worth the money, but only if it doesn't exceed the value of the speaker, which in this case with the cost of new tweeters factored in, I'd say it does. Get the Solen's and be happy.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Tin_ear_fool
    Tin_ear_fool Posts: 9
    edited April 2007
    Not to belabor the point, but further searches on this wonderful forum have told me to go with Sonicaps for the tweeters, and Solens for the woofers. That splits the cost difference as well, around $60 in caps. I worry about mixing brands, though, as mentioned in the Sonicap review on this website:http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,661
    edited April 2007
    That's why I said Sonicap's are worth the money as I think they sound better in the highs and mids. I've spoken with the owner of Sonic Craft numerous times and we've discussed that opinion. He doesn't feel that mixing his caps with others is a problem. I should add that I'm more comfortable using all the same brand.

    BTW, I'm happy you've taken it upon yourself to use the search function. You'll go far here.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    F1nut wrote: »
    IMO, the price difference and more importantly, the sound quality of the Sonicap's is absolutely worth the money, but only if it doesn't exceed the value of the speaker, which in this case with the cost of new tweeters factored in, I'd say it does. Get the Solen's and be happy.

    BINGO. You also have to consider the electronics you are running and where the speaks fit into your hierarchy. My 5b's are in a secondary system and the extra expense for the Sonic caps just wasn't worth it. However the Sonic caps are a superior sounding component compared to the Solens. I have LSi9's in the main system so that's where I do all my critical listening.

    In my experience if you are going to do the x-overs it's probably a good idea to get the RD0's. For me personally after the x-over upgrade the sl2000 was just unlistenable. Keep in mind the sl2000 isn't the greatest to begin with, it has a nasty 6db spike at around 13kHZ and the new components just seem to make it worse. The Polk replacement RD0194-1 is a much more balanced, smoother, less fatiguing tweeter that works really well especially with the new x-over components.

    Good luck

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,661
    edited April 2007
    Brock,

    Exactly! You understood your use and the resulting choices were right on the money. Did I say, nice job yet? Nice job.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,395
    edited April 2007
    Thanks to everyone for the kind words. I am really enthused about this project because it was a lot of fun and the results are off the charts. I expected some improvement but they turned out really well, better than expected. You don't realize how gradual the parts wear out or the benefit of using better than orignal spec parts until you actually do it.

    I'm so stoked I might even consider doing my LSi 9's at some point. Although in looking over the x-over Polk used pretty high grade mylar caps on the tweets and all the other components seem to be above average. It would be fun to use some really high end caps and see what the results would be.

    I wonder if it would be possible to get pre-drilled blank PC boards for the LSi 9 x-overs so I could just use my own new parts w/o the hassle of removing the old parts. Plus, it would be easier to swap them in and out for comparison. Kind of an unusual request, but I wonder if Ken could accomidate such a request.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • jakelm
    jakelm Posts: 4,081
    edited April 2007
    OK..Now I'm convinced. I'm upgrading my Solens' with Sonicaps for my peerless.

    Damn you...damn you all:p :D
    Monitor 7b's front
    Monitor 4's surround
    Frankinpolk Center (2 mw6503's with peerless tweeter)
    M10's back surround
    Hafler-200 driving patio Daytons
    Tempest-X 15" DIY sub w/ Rythmik 350A plate amp
    Dayton 12" DVC w/ Rythmik 350a plate amp
    Harman/Kardon AVR-635
    Oppo 981hd
    Denon upconvert DVD player
    Jennings Research (vintage and rare)
    Mit RPTV WS-55513
    Tosh HD-XA1
    B&K AV5000


    Dont BAN me Bro!!!!:eek:
  • Sumbrada77
    Sumbrada77 Posts: 37
    edited April 2007
    Another possiblity Caps wise is the the ClarityCap line. They were reviewed and rated SonicCap level in the this review and very high in other reviews. I purchased (4) 12uF SA series for my Monitor 10 upgrade. Once I get the rest of the parts in and do the upgrade I will give a review. The SAs are the top of the line and were ~$12 each at http://www.e-speaker.com which is cheaper thaan the SonicCaps but more than the Solens. http://www.humblehomemadehifi.com/Cap.html
    CARPE CEREVISI!!
    A Wise man, Keeps his Friends close, but keeps his
    Enemies Closer !!

    Yamaha RX-V659 A/V receiver, Maganox CDP482 CD,
    Pansonic DVD F85, Marantz 6300 TT w/Apature KOCE
    Polk 10s (mains), M&K 3B (backs), Polk 5b Center
    HSU Research VTF-2 Mk1 subwoofer
    DIY twisted speaker cable
  • Tin_ear_fool
    Tin_ear_fool Posts: 9
    edited April 2007
    In case anyone is still following this thread, question:

    Looking at the Clarity Caps, SAs for the tweets, and PX for the mid-woofer. Would a 30 uF (PX series) work just fine in place of the stock 34s?