1-bit vs 24-bit DAC???

Options
kenstewart
kenstewart Posts: 139
edited March 2006 in Car Audio & Electronics
I'm about to purchase a HDD-based HU (Pioneer), but it says the DAC is 1-bit while I see several newer HUs w/24-bit DACs ... will this make that much of a difference in sound quality/power? Basically, will I regret purchasing this instead of a 24-bit DAC system?
Eclipse CD8445 HU
Image Dynamics CXS54 Chameleons component setup
Two 8" Image Dynamics ID8D2v.3 subs
MTX MXA6001 amp for subs
MTX MXA3002 2-channel amp for comps
Accumat and Peel-n-Seal
Stinger and Knukoncpetz wiring
Post edited by kenstewart on

Comments

  • neomagus00
    neomagus00 Posts: 3,899
    edited March 2006
    Options
    i believe that this is a bad case of marketing - one of the worst audio-related diseases to ever affect our world...

    i've searched for a definitive answer to this in the past, because it's come up repeatedly... there are many examples of "24-bit resolution, 1-bit DACs" out there (search the string "1-bit" AND "24-bit" in google)...

    i have come to the conclusion that marketers are retahded... the '24' part is, i'm almost positive, the sample resolution... that is, at any particular sample (in a CD, there are 44,100 of them per second), there are 2^24 possible positions for the signal level... a normal CD has only 16-bit resolution, or 2^16 possible positions... the up-sampling to 24 bits is intended to provide a smoother sound, and i imagine the '1-bit' part of that spec is related to the interpolation there...

    upshot - they are one and the same... either you get a normal 16-bit DAC, or a 24-bit/1-bit DAC... the 24 will probably sound a little better, depending on your other equipment, and will probably cost a lot more...
    It's not good, very fundamentally simply not good. - geolemon

    "Its not good enough until we have real-time fearmongering. I want my fear mongered as it happens." - Shizelbs
  • kenstewart
    kenstewart Posts: 139
    edited March 2006
    Options
    Thanks neo ... I did a search as well where some people asked the same question then all of a sudden it started getting into debates between engineers :)
    Eclipse CD8445 HU
    Image Dynamics CXS54 Chameleons component setup
    Two 8" Image Dynamics ID8D2v.3 subs
    MTX MXA6001 amp for subs
    MTX MXA3002 2-channel amp for comps
    Accumat and Peel-n-Seal
    Stinger and Knukoncpetz wiring
  • howie777
    howie777 Posts: 357
    edited March 2006
    Options
    This is a Delta Sigma converter. The resolution is 24 bits plus a 1 bit DAC for feedback into the input from the output. This puzzled me so that is what my hardware guys at work told me. You can google Delta Sigma Converter for more information.

    Howie
  • neomagus00
    neomagus00 Posts: 3,899
    edited March 2006
    Options
    update, for those who care:

    This site says that in order to convert from 24-bit to 16-bit resolution, one must add 'dither' to make it sound right, and that the dither can come in several varieties, including 1/2, 1, or 2 bit. This is confirmed with an easy-to-understand analogy here (the 'least significant bit' this document speaks of is, I'm fairly sure, the 1/2, 1, 2 of the first document). Combined with howie777's reference to ΔΣ converters, I think what they're talking about is upsampling the 16-bit CD to 24 bits, then doing all the processing at 24 bits. I know that doing processing at 24 bits is good, because then you don't need to dither at all (I think the second reference discusses this).

    anyone care to add? modify?
    It's not good, very fundamentally simply not good. - geolemon

    "Its not good enough until we have real-time fearmongering. I want my fear mongered as it happens." - Shizelbs
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited March 2006
    Options
    Doesnt matter, you wont hear the difference between them anyway.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited March 2006
    Options
    I was able to tell the difference in sound between the units I have owned with 20Bit Burr Brown DAC's PCM 1702's (Alpine) and 24Bit Burr Brown DAC's (Eclipse) over the units with 1Bit DAC's. I think the HU's with the multi bit DAC's also had other internal components that when combined together with the premium DAC's helped produce more detailed sound over the 1bit DAC's.

    There are several companies right now that use 1bit DAC's that upconvert the signal into 24bit word. Some companies that use this DAC are Pioneer and JVC (both use the one from Burr Brown). The unit I have uses 24bit Delta Sigma DAC's from Burr Brown.
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin
  • AustinKP
    AustinKP Posts: 861
    edited March 2006
    Options
    you know, I bet nobody can hear the difference between a 20 and 24-bit d/a converter. This is, of course, my opinion, but the only reason you'd want to pay more for a deck w/ 24 bit, is that the other components used in conjuction with it are probably also higher quality.
    http://www.silverdragon.com/punkie/cybertusk/net.idiot.html - Read it, know it

    Alpine 9815
    Polk MM6's in custom fiberglass door pods
    Ascendant Audio Atlas 12
    HiFonics Zeus ZX6400 - 85x2 + 350x1
    2 Gallons SecondSkin Spectrum V.2
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited March 2006
    Options
    I actually liked the sound from the unit with the four 20bit Burr Brown DAC's more. Not using it anymore because it did not like to read CD-R's. Once in a while I scan Ebay to see if maybe I want to pick that setup again :D.
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin
  • kenstewart
    kenstewart Posts: 139
    edited March 2006
    Options
    Well, thanks for the info guys but it seems to me it doesn't make that big a difference after seeing responses here and other sites. Delta Sigma, Burr-Brown, Starsky-Hutch, so on and so on ... too advanced for me I guess :) I ended up purchasing an Eclipse CD-8445 HU which does have the 24-bit DAC.

    For those that hate the Sony HUs ... are you proud of me for moving up to Eclipse? :)
    Eclipse CD8445 HU
    Image Dynamics CXS54 Chameleons component setup
    Two 8" Image Dynamics ID8D2v.3 subs
    MTX MXA6001 amp for subs
    MTX MXA3002 2-channel amp for comps
    Accumat and Peel-n-Seal
    Stinger and Knukoncpetz wiring
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited March 2006
    Options
    That is a nice HU you have there, and that 24bit Burr Brown DAC isn't too shaby either :D.
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin
  • kenstewart
    kenstewart Posts: 139
    edited March 2006
    Options
    lmao ... ty :)
    Eclipse CD8445 HU
    Image Dynamics CXS54 Chameleons component setup
    Two 8" Image Dynamics ID8D2v.3 subs
    MTX MXA6001 amp for subs
    MTX MXA3002 2-channel amp for comps
    Accumat and Peel-n-Seal
    Stinger and Knukoncpetz wiring
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited March 2006
    Options
    I like Sony. If they had a model with high voltage pre-outs, time alignment and a good EQ I probably wouldve bought a Sony over my Alpine.
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • cam5860
    cam5860 Posts: 632
    edited March 2006
    Options
    If sony had there mobile es stuff like they had in the late 90's I would jump on it in a heart beat. In my opinion they had some of the best cd players you could buy back in the day.
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited March 2006
    Options
    Very true, so did Alpine.........
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin
  • MacLeod
    MacLeod Posts: 14,358
    edited March 2006
    Options
    Yeah, I wish Sony would come out swinging in car audio. Theyre capable of such unreal products I dont understand why theyre satisfied with Xplod!
    polkaudio sound quality competitor since 2005
    MECA SQ Rookie of the Year 06 ~ MECA State Champ 06,07,08,11 ~ MECA World Finals 2nd place 06,07,08,09
    08 Car Audio Nationals 1st ~ 07 N Georgia Nationals 1st ~ 06 Carl Casper Nationals 1st ~ USACi 05 Southeast AutumnFest 1st

    polkaudio SR6500 --- polkaudio MM1040 x2 -- Pioneer P99 -- Rockford Fosgate P1000X5D
  • 1996blackmax
    1996blackmax Posts: 2,436
    edited March 2006
    Options
    I totally agree. It is sad to see where they are now.......
    Alpine: CDA-7949
    Alpine: PXA-H600
    Alpine: CHA-S624, KCA-420i, KCA-410C
    Rainbow: CS 265 Profi Phase Plug / SL 165
    ARC Audio: 4150-XXK / 1500v1-XXK
    JL Audio: 10W6v2 (x2)
    KnuKonceptz
    Second Skin