Quality of Copied CD's?????

1235»

Comments

  • Jstas
    Jstas Posts: 14,973
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by Jstas
    Do you think you can try to understand it this time and quit trying to re-write physics to meet your own little bass ackwards world?


    Obviously not.
    Expert Moron Extraordinaire

    You're just jealous 'cause the voices don't talk to you!
  • Roy Munson
    Roy Munson Posts: 886
    edited May 2005
    So,,,do burned copies sound better or not? :D
    2 Channel:
    Amp/Parasound Halo A23
    Pre/Carver C-1
    Tuner/Carver TX-11a
    CDP/Jolida JD 100A
    Turntable/AR XB-Shure V15 III
  • dragon1952
    dragon1952 Posts: 4,907
    edited May 2005
    LOL! Yeah....really. You guys got a little off track there and left us spectators on the edges of our seats waiting for the final verdict.
    2 channel - Willsenton R8 tube integrated, Holo Audio Spring 3 KTE DAC, audio optimized NUC7i5, Windows 10 Pro/JRiver MC29/Fidelizer Plus 8.7 w/LPS and external SSD drive, PS Audio PerfectWave P3 regenerator, KEF R3 speakers, Rythmik F12SE subwoofer, Audioquest Diamond USB cable, Gabriel Gold IC's, Morrow Audio SP5 speaker cables. Computer - Windows 10/JRiver, Schiit Magni 3+/Modi 3+, Fostex PMO.4n monitors, Sennheiser HD600 headphones
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by Roy Munson
    So,,,do burned copies sound better or not? :D

    No......How can a copy sound BETTER than the original!!! You can make a perfect copy and you can make a near-perfect copy that sounds just as good as the original. But you CANNOT make a copy better than the original.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited May 2005
    So when talking about CD playback we should get that stupid Circuit City look and exclaim "Its Digital!" with that all assuming look which confirms our belief that it is obviously perfect? I think not. We are not the typical people who buy bose...

    madmax

    Edit: Sorry, I forgot to add the :)
    Nothing against CC employees.
    Etc...


    One other thought, if it is all just digital and a copy is the same as an original, then why do they often pop, clip or skip??
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by madmax
    So when talking about CD playback we should get that stupid Circuit City look and exclaim "Its Digital!" with that all assuming look which confirms our belief that it is obviously perfect? I think not. We are not the typical people who buy bose...

    madmax

    I don't understand what your point is. The analog conversion is where the sound is make or break. The actual extraction of digital info (cd player) is of much lesser consequence, to a point. Use a cheap transport and a well designed DAC and you'll understand. This is generalization of course. A much better transport will give somewhat better results.

    I still don't think I understand what your statement is getting at. Just because it's Digital doesn't mean it sounds good .

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited May 2005
    I guess what I'm getting at is that the data on the disc may or may not be read/written to properly by the drive. If it were always read/written properly (all a strict digital medium with no analog component) then you would never have a difference between an original disc or any copy. Copies often have many noises such as skips or pops or such. I think there is much more to this than writing 1's and 0's.
    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • PolkThug
    PolkThug Posts: 7,532
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by billbillw
    I believe the only source of natural crystals was in a Jedi Temple on the planet Illum, the location of which was a closely guarded Jedi secret. The Sith would not be able to obtain the natural crystals without letting their identity and prescence be known. During the Clone Wars, Count Duku gave up the location of the Jedi Temple on Illum and it was destroyed by an army of cloaked droids.

    Actually,

    In the Jedi Order, each Jedi student makes a journey to get Illium Crystals for the lightsaber they will one day build. This journey is considered a rite of passage. As a result, Jedi sabers are many different colors depending on the crystals they find.

    There is no such ritual for the Sith. The Sith prefer synthetic crystals for their sabers. The synthetic crystals save the Sith the long trek to get Illium Crystals, provide more blade tuning options, and give Sith sabers their characteristic red blade.
  • TheReaper
    TheReaper Posts: 636
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by Jstas
    And now!
    A LINK!
    http://www.usbyte.com/common/compact_disk_4.htm
    Ain't the internet great?
    Oh, by the way, these are white papers written by the wonderful people who CREATED the technology known as Compact Disc.
    And who else noticed the illustration sample on that page is flawed. It has two '1's separated by only one '0'. One of the reasons for EFM coding, is to spread out the length of time between Land/Pit transitions. With EFM coding there is always at least two '0's between two '1's.
    Win7 Media Center -> Onkyo TXSR702 -> Polk Rti70
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited May 2005
    What was EFM coding?
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • TheReaper
    TheReaper Posts: 636
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by madmax
    What was EFM coding?
    Eight-to-Fourteen Modulation, which is used on audio CDs. Each 8 bits of data is looked up in a table for a corresponding 14 bits of data. This 14 bit value is what is burned on the CD. The whole idea is to stretch the data a little. So there is more spacing between Land/Pit transitions.
    Win7 Media Center -> Onkyo TXSR702 -> Polk Rti70
  • cfrizz
    cfrizz Posts: 13,415
    edited May 2005
    All I know is that every copy of an original cd I have burned sounds just as good as the original. Unless it is a horrible original then the copy sounds just as bad as the original.

    Whatever the rest of you can or can't hear is your problem!:p

    And I don't give a flying fig about 1's & 0's or pits, grooves or edges!

    Have a nice weekend all. I'm going to enjoy my new CD player in all its digital analog whatever glory!:D
    Marantz AV-7705 PrePro, Classé 5 channel 200wpc Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony XBR-49X800E TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Polk ES30 Center Channel, Polk S15 Surround Speakers SVS SB12-NSD x2
  • billbillw
    billbillw Posts: 7,468
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by PolkThug
    Actually,

    In the Jedi Order, each Jedi student makes a journey to get Illium Crystals for the lightsaber they will one day build. This journey is considered a rite of passage. As a result, Jedi sabers are many different colors depending on the crystals they find.

    There is no such ritual for the Sith. The Sith prefer synthetic crystals for their sabers. The synthetic crystals save the Sith the long trek to get Illium Crystals, provide more blade tuning options, and give Sith sabers their characteristic red blade.

    Well knowledged in the Jedi arts, you are!

    I knew about the trek/rite of passage, but I figured that because the Jedi controlled Illum, the Sith were not able to get the real crystals. After all, the Sith were hiding from the Jedi/ the Rebulic during most of the pre-Phantom Menace time period.

    By the way, to Heiney, this is NOT from the new movie. I haven't seen it yet either. Most of what I posted is from the Clone War I collection of animated shorts that was released to bridge the time from "Attack of the Clones" to "Revenge of the Sith". Its available on DVD and kind of like the Animatrix. There is so much Star Wars sub culture and lore out there, that none of this is new to the typical Star Wars Geek.
  • Shizelbs
    Shizelbs Posts: 7,433
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by Crazed
    light is digital (photon packets).

    Wave particle duality my friend.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by madmax
    I guess what I'm getting at is that the data on the disc may or may not be read/written to properly by the drive. If it were always read/written properly (all a strict digital medium with no analog component) then you would never have a difference between an original disc or any copy. Copies often have many noises such as skips or pops or such. I think there is much more to this than writing 1's and 0's.
    madmax

    If you use a program like EAC or similar you will get an EXACT digital copy of the 1's and 0's. Yes there are other 'artifacts' that can be introduced and those artifacts maybe problems with the the drive mechanism, although not likely. As I've stated before these noises and pops most likely come from not knowing how to properly rip/burn a disc. Anything can happen, but the best results (ie; most consistent) are achieved by ripping to the hard drive with EAC and burning to a disc using the Full version of a well known burning program. There is also a little know-how involved. Also, if you have marginal system resources, don't have any programs running in the background or run any other programs simultaneously. Will this work 100% of the time, no but it will work 98% of the time. The other 2% are just random chance.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Madmax,

    I guess I'm assuming everyone knows how to make a proper copy. I guess if you don't have the right software or a bit of experience and especially the right equipment, then some of your concerns are valid. The pops, clicks,skips you refer to are operator error more than hardware/software issue. All things being equal.

    Analogy mode on:

    It's like baking a cake. Eveyone starts with the same ingredients (computer, EAC program, burning software, media) but what comes out as the end result can be different. It's not the fault of the process its the fault of the baker (operator)

    Damn it's late and I've had a few...did I just compare baking a cake to burning cdr's :confused:

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • phuz
    phuz Posts: 2,372
    edited May 2005
    This thread makes baby Jesus cry.

    Oh, and if you do a direct copy - there is no difference in the burned CD vs. the original.
  • madmax
    madmax Posts: 12,434
    edited May 2005
    I use nero 6, a duron 1.8 processor and don't seem to have a problem but friends have often burned CD's for me which have problems. My work computer has burned some bad discs but it is loaded with cad, simulation and compiler software. It is a P4 2 something Ghz also with Nero 6. I guess I just don't know how to make a proper copy. Seems to me it shouldn't be that high level but I guess maybe you have to be computer literate or something...
    madmax
    Vinyl, the final frontier...

    Avantgarde horns, 300b tubes, thats the kinda crap I want... :D
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by madmax
    I use nero 6, a duron 1.8 processor and don't seem to have a problem but friends have often burned CD's for me which have problems. My work computer has burned some bad discs but it is loaded with cad, simulation and compiler software. It is a P4 2 something Ghz also with Nero 6. I guess I just don't know how to make a proper copy. Seems to me it shouldn't be that high level but I guess maybe you have to be computer literate or something...
    madmax

    My comments weren't necessarily directed toward you Madmax. But hardware/software set-up/compatibility is a huge issue. Plus computers are designed to be multi-functional, not just cd copiers. So when you introduce these variables plus some people's clueless ness ( not you) sometimes you can get some bad burns.

    The process involved with extracting data (again can't rec Exact Audio Copy enough!) and burning it to cdr should produce consistent repeatable results. A computer environment can be a volatile place as we all know. I hope I'm getting my point across that the PROCESS isn't the fault; it’s the implementation that can be at fault.

    My old computer, which is a dinosaur by today's standards, had all kinds of trouble burning cdr's. Its main problem was the CPU speed and memory issues and internal buss configuration. I use the EXACT same process with my new computer and have yet to make a bad burn. Also if you buy a $5 ROM drive expect to have negative issues with it.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • marker
    marker Posts: 1,084
    edited May 2005
    Does anyone know how are those Instant Live CDs are made that you can buy a copy of the concert you just saw straight from the band's soundboard right there at the venue 10 minutes after the show is over?
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Originally posted by marker
    Does anyone know how are those Instant Live CDs are made that you can buy a copy of the concert you just saw straight from the band's soundboard right there at the venue 10 minutes after the show is over?

    I've wonderd about that myself. Those are a product of Clear Channel and I was hoping they'd take off more than they have. Some very limited titles have been offered through BB, but none of the more popular artists.

    I saw Jewel last year about a week before she announced that she would participate. Her concerts were never offered thru BB and command big $$$ on E-bay ($150-300). I'm not sure how they mix them or dupe them. I have heard from other people that only a limited amount are available. And for a while they would take your mailing info and send you a copy a few weeks after the show. I think they stopped doing that though and now you can only purchase after the actual show.

    Wasn't aware they were still doing this.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    I've not heard one of these yet, but the SQ is supposed to be quite good. My brother is an 80's pop synth music lover and he went and saw the group Erasure recently. Their shows were avail on the internet by a different company. He bought 2 shows prior to the one he attended and they sound very good. Great dynamics, good mix. Not bad for what is essentially an authorized bootleg.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • marker
    marker Posts: 1,084
    edited May 2005
    There's a place http://newburycomics.com/rel/v2_home.php?storenr=103&deptnr=34 that sells them authorized.

    I have two, one of Peter Frampton and one of KISS, and they sound just like an "official" live album you would buy in a store from the record company like KISS Alive or Frampton Comes Alive.

    On the KISS one, you can even clearly hear the "hiss" of the flames coming up from the stage.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,406
    edited May 2005
    Cool....thanks for the link. I was just there. No Jewel:(

    But there were others I might be interested in. More titles than BB I think.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!