Ha, my speak's are being evaluated.

2»

Comments

  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,942
    edited November 2007
    Vr3MxStyler2k3 wrote: »
    Uses smaller midbasses
    That was my next question. I could have sworn they looked smaller. Either that or that pair of speak's are immense.

    We'll see what these do to Sparky. If they do what I imagine they will do, then it's on. However, I'm a little skeptical when it comes to a different tweeter. In my experience, better is not always better.
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,942
    edited November 2007
    Let me rephrase.

    "an upgraded tweeter is not always the best choice for what I would like to achieve in terms of accurate reproduction of music." ;)
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,382
    edited November 2007
    Well I chose the Revelator because I was told its just as detailed, but more forgiving if that makes any sense at all -- made sense for me with my musical taste...

    But yeah, I think the Woodmere II uses 5.25" midbasses vs. the 7.25"

    The Woodmere on the other hand uses the 7.25"
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • VR3
    VR3 Posts: 29,382
    edited November 2007
    Woodmere

    ribbonma_lg.gif
    - Not Tom ::::::: Any system can play Diana Krall. Only the best can play Limp Bizkit.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Yashu
    Yashu Posts: 772
    edited November 2007
    You and those taylos, you love em. I had a pair of speakers I own in Stereophile a while back, good review, except they used the one type of music that I think are their weakest point, and only one type of music. I have nothing against classical music as a genre, but if you are going to do a speaker review, come on, not ALL audiophiles listen to NOTHING but classical. The reviewer liked them anyway, so makes me wonder...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • reeltrouble1
    reeltrouble1 Posts: 9,312
    edited November 2007
    treitz3 wrote: »
    In my experience, better is not always better.


    waaaaaaaaaaaa, fitting for a Yogi Berra level quote.

    Sid and Tom the newest Polk Dynamic Duo.

    RT1
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • treitz3
    treitz3 Posts: 19,942
    VR3 wrote: »
    Woodmere

    ribbonma_lg.gif

    Hahaha.....years later? (Quite a bit....)

    Tom
    ~ In search of accurate reproduction of music. Real sound is my reference and while perfection may not be attainable? If I chase it, I might just catch excellence. ~
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dr_Wu
    Dr_Wu Posts: 356
    Sherman, set the Wabac machine for 2007.
    Yes, Mr. Peabody
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • la2vegas
    la2vegas Posts: 762
    edited December 2024
    cypyb5wetxio.jpg

    Or if you prefer...

    x403dq3n61er.jpg

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter