DRM Music Converter Software

Anyone here ever use DRM music converter software to convert files from Spotify, Tidal, etc. into FLAC, MP3, etc.?

I've played around with the trial of the Spotify version from DRmare here: https://www.drmare.com/ and it seems to work well. It can convert at up to 48kHz and over 320kbps.

The resulting bit rate seems to depend on the source file. Some that I converted came over at 800-900kbps, and others up to well over 1,000kbps. The trial version will only convert one minute of music, and the FLACs I converted varied in size from ~6-8MB for the one minute tracks. I have Spotify Premium, so not sure if that makes a difference in what bit/sample rates you can get.

Conversion happens at 5X speed, so typical song takes less than a minute to convert. It retains ID tags during the conversion, and also brings in album artwork. You can select individual songs, or choose an entire album or playlist to convert in a batch.

DRmare has a Tidal version as well, but I haven't tried it. They have PC and Mac versions of the software. Spotify version costs $29.95, and Tidal is $34.95.

They have other conversion products as well, including one that converts those pesky M4P files...and practically any other format. That's actually how I found them. I got a new portable DAP that doesn't play M4P files, so I needed something to convert all the old iTunes files from YEARS past.
"This may not matter to you, but it does to me for various reasons, many of them illogical or irrational, but the vinyl hobby is not really logical or rational..." - member on Vinyl Engine
"Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time, I do what I have to." - Cicero, in Gladiator
Regarding collectibles: "It's not who gets it. It's who gets stuck with it." - Jimmy Fallon

Comments

  • ClipdatClipdat Posts: 8,310
    Isn't this skirting the fine line of copyright infringement?
  • jdjohnjdjohn Posts: 1,487
    Perhaps...but tell me this: do you have to 'subscribe for life' to justify listening to music that you've paid good money to hear online...or have the RIGHT to hear? Of course re-selling downloaded tracks, or using them towards your own profit, is the primary infringement violation...not listening to music that you have paid for THE RIGHT to hear and download.

    And there's the thing - if you download a file to listen 'offline' via their app, why can't you convert the file to another, more universal, format?
    "This may not matter to you, but it does to me for various reasons, many of them illogical or irrational, but the vinyl hobby is not really logical or rational..." - member on Vinyl Engine
    "Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time, I do what I have to." - Cicero, in Gladiator
    Regarding collectibles: "It's not who gets it. It's who gets stuck with it." - Jimmy Fallon
  • ClipdatClipdat Posts: 8,310
    Might want to read Tidal's EULA.
  • NightfallNightfall Posts: 9,139
    Deja Vu
    afterburnt wrote: »
    They didn't speak a word of English, they were from South Carolina.

    Village Idiot of Club Polk
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 25,824
    edited November 2019
    Clipdat wrote: »
    Isn't this skirting the fine line of copyright infringement?

    Since you brought it up -- I don't think it is "skirting" at all, FWIW. :|
    I believe that the purpose of DRM is to discourage piracy.
    That said.

    1) it's not my place to tell others what to do or not to do.
    2) I reckon that any s/w products that enable copying of copyrighted material that employs DRM will state in their EULAs that it is the end user's responsibility to ensure that all applicable laws and regulations are complied with in the use of the s/w. What the end user does with the conditions of the EULA is a risk management decision. The RIAA (e.g.) is not likely to go after an individual... but it has happened.

    As @Clipdat notes, the EULA of the streaming/download service in question should state what rights the end user has and doesn't have vis-a-vis content hosted on the service. Generally, I thought that one of the benefits (on the supplier side) of the business model of the streaming services is to dissuade end users from copying/downloading the content.

    Even with physical media (CDs & records), one purchases the physical media and a license to use the copyrighted content contained thereupon -- one does not own the content, only the medium.

  • Clipdat wrote: »
    Isn't this skirting the fine line of copyright infringement?

    😂😂😂😂
    "if it's not fun, it's not worth it & remember folks, "It's All About The Music"!!
    *****************************
  • OleBootOleBoot Posts: 695
    Wow, I'd better stop using my DVR before there's a dawn raid.
  • erniejadeerniejade Posts: 5,368
    @OleBoot Is your dvr owned by the cable company or by you?

    If owned by the cable company, once you stop paying for the service the movie or show goes away. Same as Tidal.
    Den: Lumin D1,Wireworld Silver Eclipse RCA, KEF LS50 Wireless, Velodyne SPL1200, Technics 1200, Denon DL160, Jolida D9,

    Living Room:,T+A PA 1530R, Tyler Highland H2, High Fidelity Reveal RCA, Aries Mini, LKS MH-da004, Wireworld Silver Eclipse SC

    Have but haven't used in a while: LH Labs VI Dac, Cayin SCD50T, , W4S recovery,Grant Fidelity Tube Dac 11
  • msgmsg Posts: 5,763
    Clipdat wrote: »
    Isn't this skirting the fine line of copyright infringement?

    😂😂😂😂
    THJ says, "Hahaha, Amateurs!"

    I disabled signatures.
  • OleBootOleBoot Posts: 695
    erniejade wrote: »
    @OleBoot Is your dvr owned by the cable company or by you?

    If owned by the cable company, once you stop paying for the service the movie or show goes away. Same as Tidal.

    It was a mindless joke, but very good point.
  • jdjohnjdjohn Posts: 1,487
    So, an honest question: Why would this product still be allowed on the market if it were considered illegal? It's even had a positive review from C/Net FWIW.

    Also, is sharing hi-res files (from whatever source) between forum members an infringement?
    "This may not matter to you, but it does to me for various reasons, many of them illogical or irrational, but the vinyl hobby is not really logical or rational..." - member on Vinyl Engine
    "Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time, I do what I have to." - Cicero, in Gladiator
    Regarding collectibles: "It's not who gets it. It's who gets stuck with it." - Jimmy Fallon
  • MartinlingMartinling Posts: 7
    I found out that there are so many similar companies on the market. One of them is AudFree Software, which also has Spotify Music Converter, Tidal Downloader, even for Apple Music Converter.
    So many such companies here. Why choose the one you mentioned? Just give more detailed information about it. Let's make the right decision.
  • jdjohnjdjohn Posts: 1,487
    I've made my decision, spammer. You make yours.
    "This may not matter to you, but it does to me for various reasons, many of them illogical or irrational, but the vinyl hobby is not really logical or rational..." - member on Vinyl Engine
    "Sometimes I do what I want to do. The rest of the time, I do what I have to." - Cicero, in Gladiator
    Regarding collectibles: "It's not who gets it. It's who gets stuck with it." - Jimmy Fallon
  • Ashley2060Ashley2060 Posts: 1
    Sounds good. I will try it. Thanks.
  • GardenstaterGardenstater Posts: 1,072
    If I recall correctly you can only download TIDAL files with the mobile app but not the desktop one. I'm sure removing the DRM is against the EULA but I don't see any harm in it personally, if you don't share it with anyone else. It is definitely a slippery slope though. They want you to lose access to the files when you discontinue your subs of course. As far as the effect on the artists goes, that would be another question. They probably only get paid once, when you make the download.

    There is another way also. The high res stream can be recorded with programs such as Audials 2016 (I have this), that take the stream after it goes through your kernel mixer of your operating system and copy it. Is it bitperfect? I doubt it because I hear a very slight loss of fidelity or openness so there must be a re-sampling involved. This is legal as far as I know.
    George / NJ

    Polk 7B main speakers (1979, orig owner)
    Martin Logan Dynamo sub
    Crown D150 amp
    iFi nano iDSD DAC
    iPurifier3
    iDefender w/ iPower PS
    iFi Mercury 0.5m OFHC continuous cast copper USB cable
    Custom Ribbon Speaker Cables, 5ft long, 4N Copper, 14 gauge, ultra low inductance
    Custom Vibration Isolation Speaker Stands and Sub Platform
  • pitdogg2pitdogg2 Posts: 16,774
    Moleeee reported
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!