HT Preamp/Processor vs. Receiver

Options
Hey Guys

It has been awhile since I've been in the AVR market. I'm moving into a new space this year and will be leaving my Onkyo 706 behind.

I have separate amplification for 5 or 7 channels so it could be an AVR or Preamp/Processor. Are dedicated HT Processors a significant jump in sound quality over using the AVR preouts? Prices seem to suggest that this is so.

I don't care about 4K pass or Atmos but need HDMI and support for the DTS HD and Dolby TrueHD. Outlaw 975 seems a bit bare bones but might have everything I need, price is flexible. What else is out there similar to this?

All the bells and whistles of fancy AVR's don't interest me much. What solutions have you guys found? Are you using an AVR preout and just leaving the internal amps idle(seems wasteful) or using Pre/Processors (seem overpriced)?
HT Setup: Onkyo 706; Rotel RB-1075; Rti A3; Csi A6; Fxi3's

2 CH: Squeezebox Touch; Dared SL-2000a; GoldenEar Triton 5 or Lsi9's; Parasound 2125; SVS SB12-NSD; Music Hall DAC 25.2

Comments

  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    edited April 2016
    Options
    I'm a Pre/Pro kinda guy myself, See related thread which identifies some differing perspectives. There are some very nice Pre/Pros come up as preowned on different sites. I prefer looking at audiogon but there are others.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,906
    Options
    Many different ways you can go depending on your budget. Some use an AVR and just a 2 channel amp, let the receiver drive the surround speakers which normally are the easiest load for a receiver.

    Still some like the pre/pro route and a separate 5-7 channel amp for the ultimate experience. Either way, if you can afford the best, run with it.

    Personally, I like the Cary cinema 12 pre/pro for it's SQ in music and movies. If your system does double duty for HT and music, the pre/pro option is the better one imho, but not everyone has the wallet for that.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    Options
    Yup, second tony!
  • slbenz
    slbenz Posts: 97
    Options
    Went from a Pioneer Elite AVR to Marantz SSP. Same amps but big jump in sound quality going prepro.
  • cdn5003
    cdn5003 Posts: 144
    Options
    So the sound quality of a dedicated HT Pre-Processor is going to be better than an AVR being used as a Pre-Processor in almost every case.

    I guess my real question is how much better is it?

    Budget is a consideration, I'm looking to spend closer to $500 than $1,000+
    This means low lever Pre-Processor or Midrange AVR. What are the best options in this price range?

    All amplification will be external so WPC on AVRs will be meaningless, its just the signal. Midrange AVR vs. Bare bones Pre-Processor like Outlaw 975 that doesn't even have a room eq function.

    I'd probably be perfectly happy with either choice but wanted to explore all options before making a decision. I care more about music anyways and will use HT Bypass for that
    HT Setup: Onkyo 706; Rotel RB-1075; Rti A3; Csi A6; Fxi3's

    2 CH: Squeezebox Touch; Dared SL-2000a; GoldenEar Triton 5 or Lsi9's; Parasound 2125; SVS SB12-NSD; Music Hall DAC 25.2
  • pkquat
    pkquat Posts: 742
    edited May 2016
    Options
    nm... for some reason the other posts didn't show up. I'll be watching this thread. I have been pondering the same. I've been leaning towards a low power reciever with all the features of the higher watt models, but I am rethinking that. I'd love one that is fully software upgradeable. My Bluray got an update so it can now process FLAC files plus more video codecs.
  • Polkie2009
    Polkie2009 Posts: 3,834
    Options
    What Bluray machine are you running there pkquat?
  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    Options
    There are a number of high end preowned Pre/Pros that show up on sites like audiogon for very reasonable prices. IMO go with high end which beats any AVR everytime. So far, knock on wood, I've been very pleased and fortunate with my dealings. To the best of my knowledge a B&K Ref 30 Pre/Pro sells for about $250.00 and is a great unit, originally sold for $2399.00 - 2500.00.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,533
    Options
    Gunther16 wrote: »
    There are a number of high end preowned Pre/Pros that show up on sites like audiogon for very reasonable prices. IMO go with high end which beats any AVR everytime. So far, knock on wood, I've been very pleased and fortunate with my dealings. To the best of my knowledge a B&K Ref 30 Pre/Pro sells for about $250.00 and is a great unit, originally sold for $2399.00 - 2500.00.

    Issue though is if it goes bad with B&K on their processors your SOL. Trust me I know, had a Ref 50 go belly up and it was gonna be 450 to get it looked at and repaired.

    Personally here is my take.

    If I was in the market today for a bare bones setup that had some newer tech (HDMI, etc), I'd look HARD at finding a Anthem MRX series AVR. The 300/500/700 series specifically.

    They are limited in HDMI inputs (4) and dont have a phono input or some of the more fancy streaming settings but they have ARC. That room correction software is awesome.

    The brand is a good one, and they also HAVE pre-outs should your speakers require it now or down the road.

    Personally I got a MRX-500 for my loft. I hooked it up downstairs on my LSi 15's and my sub and it went head to head with my Denon X4100.

    I preferred the Anthem over the Denon hands down.

    I was using a dedicated amp for the speakers, but I felt ARC seemed to do a bit more to the music for some reason than the Denon.

    So I'd get something like the MRX-500 or MRX-300. Yes your leaving amp channels unused, but finding a processor with ARC is PRICEY.

    Alternately the Marantz 7702 (I think) is decent and has Audyssey XT on it.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • rpf65
    rpf65 Posts: 2,127
    Options
    In that price range I would probably go with an AVR. Yamaha RX A1050 is about 1200 while the older version RX A1040 is about 250 less, Amazon. If you're in the U.S. Check out accessories4less. Factory refurbished, but many have good luck with them.
  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    Options
    Issue though is if it goes bad with B&K on their processors your SOL. Trust me I know, had a Ref 50 go belly up and it was gonna be 450 to get it looked at and repaired.

    All you said is true and I'd be the last to say different, my argument would be that regardless of which brand equipment you buy new or used something will happen eventually to either. Some die before their time (but after the warranty expires) and some just never die. At any of those times you have a choice repair or buy new equal to what you had.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,533
    Options
    This is very true. The other issue with some older stuff is that they lack the calibration software that most modern units have.

    I wont say they these software calibrations fix EVERYTHING, but they are MUCH easier than dialing things in by hand.

    For me I'd make sure whatever I got at least had a decent software calibration suite with it to help me tame the issues of the room I have that I cant solve due to WAF, the placement options I have, etc.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    Options
    Also true, Alternative is to spend time on your own or call in your audio specialist and pay $50-100 bucks and have it dialed in. But if you have a good ear you can usually dial things in really well yourself with a little time and patience. Yes buying pre=owned does not get you the latest and greatest but it will get you the greatest musical experience for a lot less money spent.
  • EndersShadow
    EndersShadow Posts: 17,533
    Options
    Gunther16 wrote: »
    Also true, Alternative is to spend time on your own or call in your audio specialist and pay $50-100 bucks and have it dialed in. But if you have a good ear you can usually dial things in really well yourself with a little time and patience. Yes buying pre=owned does not get you the latest and greatest but it will get you the greatest musical experience for a lot less money spent.

    True, however dialing it in by ear can only get you so far in the older AVR's. You cant add as many cuts/boosts as the newer ones can.

    While I dislike buying new for most things, AVR's are ones that I can somewhat justify. Used as a refurb from an authorized reseller is even better.

    We agree on all of this, we just differ in that I would say go newer with something with some sort of halfway decent calibration software.

    For me I'd want something with ARC, XT or XT32. I've never hear MCACC but know its supposed to be fairly decent. YPAO isnt my cup of tea, nor is whatever Onkyo is now using that they developed in house.

    Also Anthem's "new" stuff is pricey, hence looking for a used MRX 300/500/700 which was their first line of AVR's to ever come out. They are on Gen 3 so their prices are lower, however they still fetch a bit of a premium, but given their build quality and their focus on music first without all the gimmicks I think the product is better.
    "....not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted." William Bruce Cameron, Informal Sociology: A Casual Introduction to Sociological Thinking (1963)
  • Gunther16
    Gunther16 Posts: 243
    Options
    So we both agree on most. To me the setup software does not matter as I'm the patient kind and like to tinker around to find what works. Most high end Pre/Pros do have EQ software that allow you to dial in most everything you would want to. The hard part is figuring out what does what. Yes it is not an easy task but worth it in the end. Would I personally spend the extra bucks for the convenience? No I would not. It is also known that some Eq software is not worth the extra money and does not do a real good job anyway. If I would want to get it done I'd call in a Audio Specialist and let them do it and get a print out of the settings for future reference.
  • littlewoodboats
    Options
    I have had the M-975 from Outlaw for about a year and find it does everything I need. If DTS X and Atmos are not required it should handle everything else you mentioned. No automated room correction which is a deal breaker for some but presented no issues here.

    $499.00 B stock (mine was like new without a mark anywhere) with a great 30 day return policy. Kick b u t t customer support.
  • pkquat
    pkquat Posts: 742
    edited May 2016
    Options
    Polkie2009 wrote: »
    What Bluray machine are you running there pkquat?

    Its an older Samsung, <$100 retail, nothing special. I got a small discount on it for bundling with a Samsung TV. They were all pretty much the same, but this one at the time did a good job at playing movies and mp3 on a portable HD.

    As far as room correction goes, I am not fully up tp speed on the latest systems, but there were some systems where the manual tweaking was limited. You could adjust some of the major settings, but there were other settings that were either behind the scenes when using the mic, or not available unless you did an autocalibration.

    Kill this if it is a thread derailer, but do people feel the sound fields are an important consideration as well. I have an old Sony 5.1 pre-amp that has good sound fields. My yamaha HTR reciever, not so much. Dolby 5.1 is similar between the two.
  • rpf65
    rpf65 Posts: 2,127
    Options
    The Dolby 5.1 sounds similar because it is the exact same code on both AVRs. The various DSP programs just add audio enhancements or detriments, depending on your point of view, to the basic code.

    Each manufacturer does have a distinctive sound, or house sound. The house sound, and the build quality of a pre amp over an AVR is the difference you're hearing between the Dolby sounds. If you have, for example, a $400 AVR and a $2000 pre amp, the pre amp should sound better. That's where the manufacturers put their best stuff.

    Personally the various DSP programs aren't very important to me with movies, and I absolutely hate them for music. Then again I usually, 90% of the time, listen to music in 2 channel mode.

    I think the most important thing you should be looking for is the sound. Go and listen to a few different AVRs.

    The second thing is how important is the latest and greatest format to you. You may be perfectly happy with your 5.1 setup, but who knows. Sometime down the line you may want to get an ATMOS module and bounce sound off your cieling. May just be a pretty cool thing to do on a rainy day.

    Calibration programs have one thing in common. They can make the speakers work better together than about 90% of the people on the planet. Some do it better than others, but that would probably be good for another thread.

    The current and brief previous generation AVRs will most likely offer ATMOS and 4K pass through. Same with pre amps. You would just need to make sure your tv and bd player can process it.

    Your choice now is really cost. Want a brand new latest and greatest pre pro, your looking at 2k plus. Not too worried about that, get a used or refurb previous version for 25-50% less.

    Want similar capabilities in an AVR, the newer versions, with pre ours will start about the 800-1k range. Go refurb or used, again save about 25-50%.

    Every manufacturers pre pro will sound better than their top of the line AVR. That's a given. More than likely it will also allow you to tweak your sound a little to a lot more.
  • slbenz
    slbenz Posts: 97
    Options
    I use a Marantz AV7702 and it is much better sounding than the Pioneer Elite VSX-74TXVI AVR that it replaced. Here is a link from Accessories4Less that has refurbished Marantz AV7702 in your price range: http://www.accessories4less.com/make-a-store/item/marav7702/marantz-av7702-11.2-ch-networking-a/v-preamp/processor/1.html This is where I purchased my AV7702.