The $2200 HDMI cable @ BB

12346»

Comments

  • ysss
    ysss Posts: 213
    edited January 2011
    headrott wrote: »
    Here is the link to buying the 3M HDMI cable in the USA: http://www.sjofnhifi.com/servlet/Detail?no=79

    They are located in Seattle, WA. It is $95.00 for the cable. The Supra cable is made in Sweden, not China. I make it a point to not buy Chinese made crap. IMO, just because a $2.00 HDMI cable passes a so called "test" does not mean it will give a good picture. Just as a $95.00 cable that passes a test does not mean it gives a quality picture. I would have to see the picture to know if it gives a good picture. Give the cable a try and see what you think.

    Greg

    Greg, did you change any other component/variable when you tested those cables?

    Yes, there are different grades of HDMI cable and they do affect signal 'pureness'/quality, but they shouldn't be affecting the picture quality in the way that you described them (more vibrant colors?);
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited February 2011
    You decide....psychobabble or Gospel.:confused:

    Borrowed from: http://www.sonicflare.com
    ? Copyright 2007 SonicFlare, LLC All Rights Reserved


    MIT CVT Terminator 2 series (8ft Speaker Cables: $999.00 USD) (1m RCA interconnects: $499 USD) or (1m Balanced interconnects: $699 USD)

    Music Interface Technologies, otherwise known as MIT, have been crafting high end cables since before I entered the first grade. Much like McIntosh, this California based company takes on the engineering-first design model. You will find no precious metals and geometries inside an MIT Cable. What you will find however, is a solid design that is based around the use of high quality conductors, connectors, good shielding, and a black network box. Ok, so the box may not be so common. Since the black box is so important to the MIT recipe, and since it is one of the least understood aspects of MIT?s design, I will attempt to explain the function of that box as best as I can.
    MIT CVT.jpg

    In short, MIT Cables main goal is to achieve absolute neutrality without compromising all the things we audiophiles love. The big challenge here is that practically every piece that makes up an audio cable has its own sound. While some variables seem impossible to control, the good folks at MIT Cable discovered that one of the main offenders that contributes to an uneven and unnatural presentation is perfectly controllable. As it turns out, it is all in the bandwidth!

    According to MIT, a cable should be just as efficient at 80Hz as it is at 15kHz. The problem is that the founder and head engineer of MIT Cables, Bruce Brisson, found that no cable is fully capable of maintaining its linearity while transferring a full range signal from point A to point B. The reason is because every conductor inside of a cable has a point along its bandwidth in which it is weak (or inefficient). So, while a conductor may be great at transferring a signal within a certain frequency range(say for example, between 2 and 12kHz), it?s the rest of the frequency band that it?s not so great at covering that is the problem. The cables inability to transfer the entire signal without creating ?holes? along the way results in performance robbing energy loss. This energy loss translates into limited bandwidth, which as Bruce discovered, has very audible consequences. One of the greatest challenges Bruce and his team at MIT faced was figuring out how to develop a cable that could maintain its integrity while sending a full range signal from point A to point B.

    The answer came in the form of surrounding the main conductors inside of the cable with a series of micro-conductors. You see, while each individual conductor may have a hole in its frequency response, it also has a point where it is quite efficient. The job of the micro-conductors is to counter the energy loss at its weak points in order to maximize its efficiency at strong points. The idea here is to control energy loss. If you can manage to set up these micro-conductors in sequential order to the point of controlling the entire frequency response of the cable, then you will ultimately end up with a truly efficient (and audibly neutral) cable.

    The idea worked well, but there were still some problems to sort out. Not only would the added cost of running all these extra conductors make the cable insanely expensive, but it would also make the cable insanely thick as well. Ultimately, the final solution came in the form of an innovative network circuit designed to store and release energy much in the way the micro-conductors did, only without the additional bulk and expense. Now that?s what I would refer to as a win/win/(/win?) solution!

    Although the primarily focus of this article is on how the MIT / McIntosh combo performs, it is worth mentioning that the CVT cables performed exceptionally well across every type of system that I hooked them up to. From tubes to all variations of solid state, from electrostatics to cones and domes, the sound always remained well balanced, well extended, detailed, and full. You could say that these cables do exactly what any good cable should do. They get out of the way so the signal so that everything else can have its own voice.
  • BlueFox
    BlueFox Posts: 15,251
    edited February 2011
    gdb wrote: »
    You decide....psychobabble or Gospel.:confused:

    Neither. Common sense based on basic electronics. Stop trolling and grow up.
    Lumin X1 file player, Westminster Labs interconnect cable
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD; Pass XP-22 pre; X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers; SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon QR on source, Denali 2000 (2) on amps
    Shunyata Sigma XLR analog ICs, Sigma speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • gdb
    gdb Posts: 6,012
    edited February 2011
    I was really only interested in Mantis' take on it . Not trolling, stop being a preachy **** and grow up.:rolleyes:
  • Monster Jam
    Monster Jam Posts: 919
    edited February 2011
    I've come to see a great many similarities in this hobby and religion.
    Do you hear that buzzing noise? :confused:
  • kevhed72
    kevhed72 Posts: 5,136
    edited February 2011
    Cable Death Match

    sound-cables-lawatt.jpg