Warm, bright or neutral?

B Run
B Run Posts: 1,888
edited October 2010 in Electronics
I was curious what has the biggest effect on the overall sound of my system. I have Rti speakers which are considered bright, and a Yamaha receiver which is also considered bright.
My question is if I add a separate amp (a warmer sounding one) and keep my receiver will it help? Does the tone have more to do with with amp, receiver, speakers or is it a combination of all 3? I didn't know if it was as simple as warm amp + bright speakers = neutral overall sound, or if it's much more complicated than that. If not i'm leaning more toward a Harman Kardon or Marantz because I know that will work. Any input is appreciated since I know nothing about running an separate amp.
Post edited by B Run on
«1

Comments

  • polkfarmboy
    polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
    edited October 2010
    Amp and speakers

    I added a tube amp to my rti8 and it is very warm but its perfect for the bright rti

    Brightness is awsome for movies at a moderate volume

    The yamaha is a bright pre pro so its always gona be bright no matter what amp and speaker combo I think ....unless you add a tube buffer for music then it will sound more balanced for music

    Keiko has some kinda tube buffer thingy with his yamaha and he loves it
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    Amp and speakers

    Brightness is awsome for movies at a moderate volume
    it

    Yeah I loved my Yamaha with my monitor 60's especially at high volume, but that's a good way to put it. I don't enjoy cranking the Rti's because they sound harsh but they sound very clear and detailed and low-moderate volume. I was just wondering if I added a warm sounding amp if i would only hear the warm characteristics of the amp or if the yamaha sound would get passed through to the amp and speakers?
  • polkfarmboy
    polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
    edited October 2010
    My rti8 sound super warm and realy balanced with my tube amp I bought and the bass is slamin .......very easy on the ears now and sound like diff speakers
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    I know aboulutely NOTHING about tube amps, haha here goes another week of my life reading online. Do you have anything you recomend for a 5 channel home theater setup? Are tubes good for movies as well as music, I always thought they were more for 2 channel music setups? Can I still use my Yamaha as a pre? Sorry for all the questions i'm just trying to figure out my next move.
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    I know aboulutely NOTHING about tube amps, haha here goes another week of my life reading online. Do you have anything you recomend for a 5 channel home theater setup? Are tubes good for movies as well as music? Can I still use my Yamaha as a pre? Sorry for all the questions i'm just trying to figure out my next move.

    If the Yammie has preouts, course you can.

    Some have used tubes for HT, I've heard a few setups myself and it sounded great.
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • polkfarmboy
    polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
    edited October 2010
    I have always been given the impression that tubes realy sucked for movies

    I put a dvd through my tube integrated and the sound was too laid back for action

    I am now finding out that its the SLEW rate that makes the tube amp slower to respond than a solid state
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,709
    edited October 2010
    I have always been given the impression that tubes realy sucked for movies

    Who gave you that impression? Tubes might be a waste for HT as HT sound is no where near as critical as it is for music.
    I put a dvd through my tube integrated and the sound was too laid back for action

    I think you should try it for a week or two, then go back to whatever you were using before. You might find that what you think is too laid back is actually more real.
    I am now finding out that its the SLEW rate that makes the tube amp slower to respond than a solid state

    Funny, none of my tube gear sounds slower than my SS gear.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • Joe08867
    Joe08867 Posts: 3,919
    edited October 2010
    Tubes are not slow. I agree with F1 that they are wasted in a way on movies just because the critical part of it is usually speech or an explosion. But for critical music listening a nice warm tube sound is awesome.

    Why would Guitarists and Bass players still use them today if they didn't have that just right sound??

    If they use Tubes to make the sound why wouldn't you want to use them to recreate it?
  • kevhed72
    kevhed72 Posts: 5,136
    edited October 2010
    Adding my Parasound AMP to my speakers put them just about where I like on the warm - bright scale. I tried out newer Adcom amps prior to the Parasound and didn't like the combo, but to each his own.
  • polkfarmboy
    polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
    edited October 2010
    Joe08867 wrote: »
    Tubes are not slow. I agree with F1 that they are wasted in a way on movies just because the critical part of it is usually speech or an explosion. But for critical music listening a nice warm tube sound is awesome.

    Why would Guitarists and Bass players still use them today if they didn't have that just right sound??

    If they use Tubes to make the sound why wouldn't you want to use them to recreate it?

    Seems like your saying all critical music listening has guitars and bass

    What about rap or trance.trip hop etc...? tubes are sloppy for that kind of stuff

    I stand firm in saying tubes suck for movies but I agree some old people who cant hear properly may like tubes for movies:D

    Why isnt there alot of 3 channel tube amps or 7 channels if they were good for movies
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    kevhed72 wrote: »
    Adding my Parasound AMP to my speakers put them just about where I like on the warm - bright scale. I tried out newer Adcom amps prior to the Parasound and didn't like the combo, but to each his own.

    I was thinking more along the lines of a Parasound or something similar instead of tubes from the beginning. I just wanted to make sure it was the AMP that changed the sound characteristic not the Receiver if I still used it as a pre. So even with the yamaha as a pre, it would add a warmer sound with a parasound amp? So in contrast even if I had a warm receiver like harman kardon or marantz and used an emotiva amp it would then sound bright? Sorry for all the questions just trying to make sure I go the best route. Thanks for all the help.
  • polkfarmboy
    polkfarmboy Posts: 5,703
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    I was thinking more along the lines of a Parasound or something similar instead of tubes from the beginning. I just wanted to make sure it was the AMP that changed the sound characteristic not the Receiver if I still used it as a pre. So even with the yamaha as a pre, it would add a warmer sound with a parasound amp? So in contrast even if I had a warm receiver like harman kardon or marantz and used an emotiva amp it would then sound bright? Sorry for all the questions just trying to make sure I go the best route. Thanks for all the help.

    I think you are right but a good amp should not change sound to warm or bright
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010

    I am now finding out that its the SLEW rate that makes the tube amp slower to respond than a solid state

    The difference in measured slew rate is inconsequential. How did you "find" this out? I'm curious?

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010
    Polkfarmboy

    Read this article, it's older, but hits the nail on the head. Especially pages 3 and 4 about slew rate.

    http://www.stereophile.com/interviews/1191pass/index.html
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010
    I think you are right but a good amp should not change sound to warm or bright

    Everything in the chain matters so it's not just up to the amp to set the rig's signature sound. Everyone comes along asking about a singular solution to "fix" their rig. It's not about changing just one thing, many times, it's a matter of finding gear that works well together and has synergy to reproduce the sound characteristics you prefer.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,709
    edited October 2010
    Seems like your saying all critical music listening has guitars and bass

    What about rap or trance.trip hop etc...? tubes are sloppy for that kind of stuff

    I stand firm in saying tubes suck for movies but I agree some old people who cant hear properly may like tubes for movies:D

    Why isnt there alot of 3 channel tube amps or 7 channels if they were good for movies

    You have a lot to learn, so you are in the right place.

    Lesson 1. Tubes are not sloppy, period. Hell, I've heard tube gear that sounded more SS then SS gear.

    Lesson 2. Tube amps (except OTL designs) require large output transformers. You cannot reasonably build a tube amp that has 3, 5 or 7 channels.

    Lesson 3. Rap, trance or hip hop is not music.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 51,709
    edited October 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    Everything in the chain matters so it's not just up to the amp to set the rig's signature sound. Everyone comes along asking about a singular solution to "fix" their rig. It's not about changing just one thing, many times, it's a matter of finding gear that works well together and has synergy to reproduce the sound characteristics you prefer.

    H9

    This is the most important lesson one could possibly learn about all things audio. Bravo!
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    I just wanted to make sure it was the AMP that changed the sound characteristic not the Receiver if I still used it as a pre. So even with the yamaha as a pre, it would add a warmer sound with a parasound amp? .

    The pre-amp many times is as important or more important than the amp. Adding an amp to the current receiver may or may not change the sound a great degree.

    So as not to completely discourage the OP, try running an external amp, in most cases it's an improvement. But just be aware you shouldn't stop there. This hobby is about experimenting and learning what you like and don't like. You have to start somewhere and adding an external amp is a good starting point. There are no quick fixes or quick answers. Many of us have taken years to gain the knowledge and experience.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    Ok, well then I think I'm just going to sell my yamaha and get the Harman Kardon 3600 and be done with it. I know it has the sound I'm looking for and when I do go to add an amp later it'll be one less thing to worry about. Thanks so much for the help guys.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    Ok, well then I think I'm just going to sell my yamaha and get the Harman Kardon 3600 and be done with it. I know it has the sound I'm looking for and when I do go to add an amp later it'll be one less thing to worry about. Thanks so much for the help guys.

    I prefer the HK house sound to the Yammy house sound, but just because you get the HK doesn't mean all the above posted responses don't apply. Anytime you use a receiver as a pre there is a compromise of sorts. Experimentation is key.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • Fongolio
    Fongolio Posts: 3,516
    edited October 2010
    Am I really the first person in this thread to mention room treatments for taming brightness? In my HT setup I'm using a Yamaha receiver with RTiA7's up front with a CSi40 center and it was a little bright until I added some panels on the walls. Now everything sounds just right. They helped a lot with the two channel rig as well. Bare walls with hard floors usually equals bright room.
    SDA-1C (full mods)
    Carver TFM-55
    NAD 1130 Pre-amp
    Rega Planar 3 TT/Shelter 501 MkII
    The Clamp
    Revox A77 Mk IV Dolby reel to reel
    Thorens TD160/Mission 774 arm/Stanton 881S Shibata
    Nakamichi CR7 Cassette Deck
    Rotel RCD-855 with modified tube output stage
    Cambridge Audio DACmagic Plus
    ADC Soundshaper 3 EQ
    Ben's IC's
    Nitty Gritty 1.5FI RCM
  • steveinaz
    steveinaz Posts: 19,545
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    I was curious what has the biggest effect on the overall sound of my system. I have Rti speakers which are considered bright, and a Yamaha receiver which is also considered bright.
    My question is if I add a separate amp (a warmer sounding one) and keep my receiver will it help? Does the tone have more to do with with amp, receiver, speakers or is it a combination of all 3? I didn't know if it was as simple as warm amp + bright speakers = neutral overall sound, or if it's much more complicated than that. If not i'm leaning more toward a Harman Kardon or Marantz because I know that will work. Any input is appreciated since I know nothing about running an separate amp.

    IMO, subtle differences in amps, sources, is gonna be too subtle to make much (if any) difference. Start with the choice of speaker. Speaker differences are far more apparent than components. There are things you can do to help; room treatments, making sure grills are on, speaker placement tweaks, etc--but this will only help so much.
    Source: Bluesound Node 2i - Preamp/DAC: Benchmark DAC2 DX - Amp: Parasound Halo A21 - Speakers: MartinLogan Motion 60XTi - Shop Rig: Yamaha A-S501 Integrated - Source: Rotel CD14MkII CD Player - Speakers: Elac Debut 2.0 B5.2
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    My theater room has all carpet, suede couches and curtains covering most of the walls so I think it does a good job of taming down brightness. I think for now the HK will give me the sound I want, and then in the next few months when I add an amp it will be what I'm looking for.
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    steveinaz wrote: »
    IMO, subtle differences in amps, sources, is gonna be too subtle to make much (if any) difference. Start with the choice of speaker. Speaker differences are far more apparent than components. There are things you can do to help; room treatments, making sure grills are on, speaker placement tweaks, etc--but this will only help so much.

    You make a good point, I realize it has a lot to do with the speakers themselves. I was happy with my Yamaha and monitors paired together but since I replaced the monitors with rti's I can't stand them at high volume. I usually crank up movies and music when I listen but it doesn't sound good to me anymore and I just assumed it's because of my receiver and maybe lack of separate amplification for the rti's. They sound crystal clear at low-moderate but I turned down an opportunity to show off my system the other day because I didn't even want to crank it up and I'm not happy with where it's at right now.
  • heiney9
    heiney9 Posts: 25,421
    edited October 2010
    On the flip side, better speakers show flaws in lesser gear. Maybe that's waht could be going on too.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | Roon Nucleus 1 w/LPS - Tubes add soul!
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited October 2010
    What about rap or trance.trip hop etc...? tubes are sloppy for that kind of stuff

    I stand firm in saying tubes suck for movies but I agree some old people who cant hear properly may like tubes for movies:D

    Rap/trance/hip hop isn't something I think anyone would listen to 'critically'

    You obviously haven't heard an HT setup utilizing tubes. I have, and it sounded pretty damn good. Oh and btw, I'm only 25 so do trust my hearing is pretty damn good.
    F1nut wrote: »
    You have a lot to learn, so you are in the right place.

    Lesson 1. Tubes are not sloppy, period. Hell, I've heard tube gear that sounded more SS then SS gear.

    Lesson 2. Tube amps (except OTL designs) require large output transformers. You cannot reasonably build a tube amp that has 3, 5 or 7 channels.

    Lesson 3. Rap, trance or hip hop is not music.

    Lol +1 on Lesson 3.
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    Ok going to hijack my own thread since it's an electronics question. Just got a monster power hts 2600 today, and am trying to figure out where to plug in my receiver. Should I use isolated high current audio or isolated analog audio? High current says "amp & spare" analog says "receiver & processor". So judging from the stickers I should go analog but I wanted to see if high current would be better since I'm not running an amp?
  • kawizx9r
    kawizx9r Posts: 5,150
    edited October 2010
    B Run wrote: »
    Ok going to hijack my own thread since it's an electronics question. Just got a monster power hts 2600 today, and am trying to figure out where to plug in my receiver. Should I use isolated high current audio or isolated analog audio? High current says "amp & spare" analog says "receiver & processor". So judging from the stickers I should go analog but I wanted to see if high current would be better since I'm not running an amp?

    On a few power conditioners, I've plugged it into the Spare while on others I plugged it into the Receiver/Processor.

    Never heard a difference, though I always had an amp hooked up to it.
    Truck setup
    Alpine 9856
    Phoenix Gold RSD65CS

    For Sale
    Polk SR6500
    Polk SR5250
    Polk SR104


    heiney9 wrote: »
    Any clue how to use the internet? Found it in about 10 sec.
  • B Run
    B Run Posts: 1,888
    edited October 2010
    That's what I figured, I'll just follow the stickers.
  • cnh
    cnh Posts: 13,284
    edited October 2010
    Synergy is a Bxxxx! While the suggestions above are great...you could spend a lot of time and tons of money trying to find it? Whereas you pretty much know already that the HK or Marantz will tone down those Rtis. But it's a hobby after all. Just depends on how much you want to chase the car!

    I've run Rti bookshelves on an HK receiver and that certainly helps them. Is it 'ideal'...well..of course separates and the elusive search for synergy says no. And I
    'do' agree with that.

    Good Luck!

    cnh
    Currently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!

    Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
    [sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash]