RTiA5's for HT
Getting a new pair for under $450. Also a floor model CSiA6 center for super cheap. I have read some of the threads and am concerned about the brightness of the A5 speakers. We will use mostly for HT. I thought the A9's were bright and am wondering how the A5's compare. Santa is coming tomorrow so I need your comments asap. Thanks everyone.
Post edited by Murray1 on
Comments
-
A5s are brighter..but that can be controlled by what kind of AVR you use....Harman Kardons and Marantz are 'warmer'--will take some of that away...and as you say it does NOT matter for HT....
Have you also checked out the Polk ebay site....I've seen both the A5s and the previous RTi-8s sell for less than 400 a pair there? See link above!
cnhCurrently orbiting Bowie's Blackstar.!
Polk Lsi-7s, Def Tech 8" sub, HK 3490, HK HD 990 (CDP/DAC), AKG Q701s
[sig. changed on a monthly basis as I rotate in and out of my stash] -
Any particular Harman Kardon or Marantz models to look at? I checked out HK website and it seems like they do not put out much power. I do not want to add an amp to my system.
-
Any particular Harman Kardon or Marantz models to look at? I checked out HK website and it seems like they do not put out much power. I do not want to add an amp to my system.
HK's put out enough power for the A5's so no external amp will be needed. -
I have a HK and had the same concerns about power. Here is a thread i started about it with some great opinions.
http://www.polkaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87913Front - RTiA5's
Rear - RTiA3's
Center - CSiA4
Sub - PSW110 -
HK's put out enough power for the A5's so no external amp will be needed.
not needed, but recommended though. -
A5s are brighter..but that can be controlled by what kind of AVR you use....Harman Kardons and Marantz are 'warmer'--will take some of that away...and as you say it does NOT matter for HT....
Have you also checked out the Polk ebay site....I've seen both the A5s and the previous RTi-8s sell for less than 400 a pair there? See link above!
cnh
I also thought that the A5s were a lil on the bright side.Linn AV5140 fronts
Linn AV5120 Center
Linn AV5140 Rears
M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
Odyssey Mono-Blocs
SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D -
I have the A5's and use an HK AVR345 to power them and they don't sound bright at all. 75 WPC makes them sound really good, but I'm still looking for a Carver amp to power them. With my PSW650, they sound really good for music and are great for HT and gaming.Home TheaterRTiA5 - CSiA6 - FXiA6 - PSW650 - Pioneer Elite SC-55 - Carver AV-505 - Sony 46" 120Hz - Monster HP 2400 - Xbox 360 - Playstation 32 ChannelPolk RTA 15TL - Harman Kardon HK3485 - HK DVD48 - Signal Cable IC's and speaker cables
-
I have the RTi8's (RTi A5's, with a different cabinet), and played fine through my Onkyo receiver by itself. The A5's are pretty efficient, but if you want to really unlock their potential, I'd add a separate amp. The A5's have a very detailed tweeter, which make them a good choice for home theater...the downside is that they can sound a bit bright. After adding a separate amp (an HK amp actually) and upgrading the speaker cables and interconnects (audioquest), the mid-ranged filled out, the bass is much punchier, and the speakers sound fuller overall. The other day I watched The Hang Over on blu-ray and went though the whole movie without notcing that my wife had unplugged my subwoofer. Granted the hang-over doesn't utilize the LFE channel very often, but the soundtrack did have some bassy moments that were handled very well through the 8's alone.
As efficient as the A5's are, it seems you need some power to get the mid-bass drivers to match the output and detail of the tweets. That's probably why so many people find the Rti8's and A5's bright...without being fed enough power, the speakers will very heavily bias the tweeters, and make them sound brighter. The mid-range on those A5's are niiiiice, and they really have the potential to match the clarity and detail of the tweeters.
As for HK gear....they do rate their stuff very conservatively. If an HK avr puts claims 75 watts per channel, that's 75 watts RMS, from each channel driven. Comparatively, if an Onkyo claims 90 watts per channel, that's 90 watts with 2 channels driven.....equivalent to about 30 watts per channel with 5 channels driven. For an easy comparison, pick up an Onkyo/Yamaha/Denon AVR and compare it to the weight of an HK. HK gear is HEAVY.My System Showcase!
Media Room
Paradigm Studio 60 - Paradigm CC-690 - Paradigm ADP-390 - Epik Empire - Anthem MRX300 - Emotiva XPA-5
Living-room
Paradigm MilleniaOne - Rythmik F12GSE - Onkyo TX-SR805 - Adcom 5400
Headphones
Sennheiser Momentum Over-Ear - Shure SE215 - Fiio E18 Kunlun