Week 7: So where' the post about how awesome the Vikings are?

13

Comments

  • Sami
    Sami Posts: 4,634
    edited October 2009
    cstmar01 wrote: »
    D line is good, I forget his name but he killed the packers in the last meeting, they really need to focus on blocking him.

    Jared Allen?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,448
    edited October 2009
    this guy... I guess he likes 69...

    http://www.jaredallen69inc.com/
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • cstmar01
    cstmar01 Posts: 4,424
    edited October 2009
    nooshinjohn wrote: »
    I believe you are refering to Jared Allen. They will need the hand of GOD to block him.

    Yes yes yes, Jared Allen, sorry was just getting done with lunch and didn't have time to look him up. He was KILLING us, and well hopefully they are ready for him this time. All and all it should be a good game, I know if the Vikings win it'll be a bad day at the office due to my boss being a Vikings van.... surprised to see he's still employed haha. jk
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Zoomzilla
    Zoomzilla Posts: 76
    edited October 2009
    Wow, did the OP watch the game? The Vikings had the ball with 1:36 left to go and were in the red zone. They should have at minimum tied the game. Chester was not ready for the screen pass and the rest is history. Now, if you think that one bad play at the end of the game equals getting your **** handed to you, then I don't know what to tell you. I chalk it up to football karma. The Vikings had no business winning the 49 and Raven games, yet they did. They were due to have a loss in a winning effort. What does that mean? They deserved to win the Steeler game, but they lost.

    6-1 is not bad considering I thought they would start out really slow in the beginnig while Favre was getting used to his new weapons.

    I think the Vikings lose in Lameblow. It's hard to predict this one. I really hope they win, but I will not be shocked if they end up on the losing end of this one. Without Winfield, Rodgers will have a pretty good game passing most likely. The lone INT in the first matchup was by Winfield.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,448
    edited November 2009
    WEEK 8 update... The Vikings are, in fact AWESOME!!!
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Conradicles
    Conradicles Posts: 6,096
    edited November 2009
    Favre is THE man.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • danz1906
    danz1906 Posts: 5,144
    edited November 2009
    Conradicles wrote: »
    Favre is THE man.

    That was a good game against the Packers!
    Linn AV5140 fronts
    Linn AV5120 Center
    Linn AV5140 Rears
    M&K MX-70 Sub for Music
    Odyssey Mono-Blocs
    SVS Ultra-13 Gloss Black:D
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Zoomzilla
    Zoomzilla Posts: 76
    edited November 2009
    Vikings rule, Packers drool. I will give GB credit for turning it into a game, but they still suck! Suck it Pack!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Zoomzilla wrote: »
    Vikings rule, Packers drool. I will give GB credit for turning it into a game, but they still suck! Suck it Pack!

    How many Superbowls have the Viqueens won? ENOUGH SAID!!!! Typical viqueen fan to say that the Packers 'still suck', since when?

    Even IIIIIFFFFFFFF the viqueens win the superbowl(and that is the biggest fkn IF in the world) it took a long time Packer to get you there to win it! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!:D:D:D
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dc55110
    dc55110 Posts: 128
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    How many Superbowls have the Viqueens won? ENOUGH SAID!!!! Typical viqueen fan to say that the Packers 'still suck', since when?

    Even IIIIIFFFFFFFF the viqueens win the superbowl(and that is the biggest fkn IF in the world) it took a long time Packer to get you there to win it! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!:D:D:D

    Typical packer fan... Living in the past! The Packers have one three super bowls, but only once since 1968, and that was still thirteen years ago. I don't go around bragging about the Twins world series wins from 1987 & 1991. The better team right now is the Vikings.
    (((STEREO)))
    Sony DVP-N9000es
    Squeezebox Duet
    Theta ProBasic IIIA
    Audio Research SP14
    White Audio Labs B1
    Transparent SoundWave Super
    Paradigm Studio Monitor
    B&W 802 s3

    HT
    Sony Bravia KDL-40Z4100
    Sony BDP-S350
    Yamaha HTR-5790
    NHT SB3 (Fronts)
    NHT SC2 (center)
    NHT SB2 (surround)
    Velodyne FSR12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodhead 2
    woodhead 2 Posts: 367
    edited November 2009
    Supper bowl bound.....
    Panny 8000 project
    Oppo 103D
    Fronts- Monitor 70's
    Upper fronts- Monitor 30's
    Surrounds- Monitor 50's
    Backs- Monitor 40's
    Center-CS 350
    Sub- SVS PB 2000
    Onkyo 607[back up]
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    dc55110 wrote: »
    Typical packer fan... Living in the past! The Packers have one three super bowls, but only once since 1968, and that was still thirteen years ago. I don't go around bragging about the Twins world series wins from 1987 & 1991. The better team right now is the Vikings.

    Why dont you brag about the world series wins by the twins?! Arent you proud of your team? And if the viqueens had a past to brag about then im sure most of their fans would live in the past. Why dont you look at the post I replied to, I was referring to Zoomzilla saying the Packers still suck. Well the packers still had chances in the end of both games to win so if the packers suck then I guess the viqueens arent much better. The game today could have gone either way. I never said the Packers were better, and yes the viqueens are a better team now. The reason the vikes are better is a few reasons, first and formost is in the trenches on both sides of the ball, the offense and defensive lines are excellent. You have the edge with your runningbacks, since Grant joined the Pack he is #2 in rushing yards only to AP who is #1. Oh and ummm...13 years ago is still 1 more than the viqueens. :D
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dc55110
    dc55110 Posts: 128
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    Why dont you brag about the world series wins by the twins?! Arent you proud of your team? :D

    I have very fond memories of both world series championships, yet that was then this is now. What have you done for me lately.
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    You have the edge with your runningbacks, since Grant joined the Pack he is #2 in rushing yards only to AP who is #1. Oh and ummm...13 years ago is still 1 more than the viqueens.

    Number two in what? Between the two teams, over the last two seasons? I suppose, that is true. Seeing as the he is the Packs #1 back and AP is the Vikes #1. Other than that, Grant is slightly above average back with only one, thousand yard season. In 2007 he only had 956 yards as the #1 back, while Chester Taylor had 844 yrds as the #2.
    (((STEREO)))
    Sony DVP-N9000es
    Squeezebox Duet
    Theta ProBasic IIIA
    Audio Research SP14
    White Audio Labs B1
    Transparent SoundWave Super
    Paradigm Studio Monitor
    B&W 802 s3

    HT
    Sony Bravia KDL-40Z4100
    Sony BDP-S350
    Yamaha HTR-5790
    NHT SB3 (Fronts)
    NHT SC2 (center)
    NHT SB2 (surround)
    Velodyne FSR12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • vc69
    vc69 Posts: 2,500
    edited November 2009
    nooshinjohn wrote: »
    WEEK 8 update... The Vikings are, in fact AWESOME!!!

    LoL. I checked this thread just to see that post. :p

    Packers blew it today. They didn't look too good. Pfft.
    -Kevin
    HT: Philips 52PFL7432D 52" LCD 1080p / Onkyo TX-SR 606 / Oppo BDP-83 SE / Comcast cable. (all HDMI)B&W 801 - Front, Polk CS350 LS - Center, Polk LS90 - Rear
    2 Channel:
    Oppo BDP-83 SE
    Squeezebox Touch
    Muscial Fidelity M1 DAC
    VTL 2.5
    McIntosh 2205 (refurbed)
    B&W 801's
    Transparent IC's
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,448
    edited November 2009
    vc69 wrote: »
    LoL. I checked this thread just to see that post. :p

    Packers blew it today. They didn't look too good. Pfft.

    Thanks VC... I just hope my boys won't face the Saints any time soon. They are the best in football right now IMHO...
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    dc55110 wrote: »
    I have very fond memories of both world series championships, yet that was then this is now. What have you done for me lately.



    Number two in what? Between the two teams, over the last two seasons? I suppose, that is true. Seeing as the he is the Packs #1 back and AP is the Vikes #1. Other than that, Grant is slightly above average back with only one, thousand yard season. In 2007 he only had 956 yards as the #1 back, while Chester Taylor had 844 yrds as the #2.


    #2 in the league, I can explain that to you if you need me to? Check the stats they dont lie, since grant JOINED the Pack he has the second most rushing yards in the league and Peterson is #1. GOT IT! Look it up before you talk ****!

    And as far as the twins are concerned you say "What have you done for me lately? This is a typical Minnesota bandwagon jumper statement(that means you only support your team if they do well). Well how about making one of the best runs for the playoffs in MLB history! Or since they werent in first so you didnt even notice that they did this! This way of supporting your teams is exactly why the MN pro teams cant fill the seats!

    If you want we can go on for days and I will keep making you look like an idiot who doesnt know sports. Reminds me of that ESPN commercial about the guy who talks out of his **** cause he doesnt watch enough ESPN:D
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • nooshinjohn
    nooshinjohn Posts: 25,448
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    This way of supporting your teams is exactly why the MN pro teams cant fill the seats!

    Minnesota Baseball and Football have had no troubles filling seats for years now. I do not know about the Basketball or Hockey teams however. Personally I have not watched a hockey game since the North Stars screwed us back in 1993 and left for Dallas...
    The Gear... Carver "Statement" Mono-blocks, Mcintosh C2300 Arcam AVR20, Oppo UDP-203 4K Blu-ray player, Sony XBR70x850B 4k, Polk Audio Legend L800 with height modules, L400 Center Channel Polk audio AB800 "in-wall" surrounds. Marantz MM7025 stereo amp. Simaudio Moon 680d DSD

    “When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.”— Thomas Jefferson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Zoomzilla
    Zoomzilla Posts: 76
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    How many Superbowls have the Viqueens won? ENOUGH SAID!!!! Typical viqueen fan to say that the Packers 'still suck', since when?

    Even IIIIIFFFFFFFF the viqueens win the superbowl(and that is the biggest fkn IF in the world) it took a long time Packer to get you there to win it! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!:D:D:D

    How many packer fans does it take to change a light bulb?

    100. 1 to change the bulb, the other 99 to talk about how great the old one was.

    Stop living in the past dude. You have 12 championships. That's great. Did it help you after 1996? You have won how many since then? All Packer fans can do is talk about the past. Considering you went 6-10 last year and got swept by the Mighty Vikings this year, the past is all you have.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Actually John the twins have been below average in the A.L. 25 of 29 yrs. 1987-89' they were above average and also in 1992. They were way above average in 1988. From 1995-2000 they were way below average, with 2000 being their worst in recent times with an average of 12,355.

    The Vikings have had better results since the early 2000's.
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Zoomzilla wrote: »
    How many packer fans does it take to change a light bulb?

    100. 1 to change the bulb, the other 99 to talk about how great the old one was.

    Stop living in the past dude. You have 12 championships. That's great. Did it help you after 1996? You have won how many since then? All Packer fans can do is talk about the past. Considering you went 6-10 last year and got swept by the Mighty Vikings this year, the past is all you have.

    Is that all you got? Yeah your 10-6 record did alot for you last year, first round loss again...

    The year before we did host the NFC championship game if I remember correctly, yeah thats right the one when Brent Farve played like ****...
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Zoomzilla
    Zoomzilla Posts: 76
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    Is that all you got?

    Apparently that's all it takes. Last time I checked, you were swept this year by the Vikings. The current year is all that matters.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Well then I guess the vikings suck just a little less because like you said the packers suck and the vikings barely won both games.
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Zoomzilla wrote: »
    Apparently that's all it takes. Last time I checked, you were swept this year by the Vikings. The current year is all that matters.

    So history means nothing, hmmm....thats about right coming from a vikings fan....nothing good in their history, nah nothing at all, only 4 NFC championships...but that dont mean **** to you...cuz you only live for the moment.
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    Zoomzilla wrote: »

    Stop living in the past dude. You have 12 championships. That's great. Did it help you after 1996? You have won how many since then? All Packer fans can do is talk about the past. Considering you went 6-10 last year and got swept by the Mighty Vikings this year, the past is all you have.

    I guess we could talk about the future...:D
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dc55110
    dc55110 Posts: 128
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    #2 in the league, I can explain that to you if you need me to? Check the stats they dont lie, since grant JOINED the Pack he has the second most rushing yards in the league and Peterson is #1. GOT IT! Look it up before you talk ****!

    Yeah, did that... and they don't lie...
    2007 Green Bay Packers: Total Rushing Yards - 1597 (21st), Yards per game 99.8 (21st), Yards per carry - 4.1 (13th)
    2008 Green Bay Packers: Total Rushing yards - 1805 (17th), Yards per game - 112.8 (17th), YPC - 4.1 (11th)
    Now I don't know what stat or stats you are looking at. But I don't think the Packers are #2 in any of them.
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    And as far as the twins are concerned you say "What have you done for me lately? This is a typical Minnesota bandwagon jumper statement(that means you only support your team if they do well). Well how about making one of the best runs for the playoffs in MLB history! Or since they werent in first so you didnt even notice that they did this! This way of supporting your teams is exactly why the MN pro teams cant fill the seats!

    Season ticket holder since 1986 (since 2002 personally). When I'm not at the game the radio is on. Baseball, especially the Twins, is a passion for me. Do think that Cubs fans reminisce about those back to back World Series championships of '07 & '08? I will always want my team to be winning, but I still watch/cry/heart break when they don't!
    (((STEREO)))
    Sony DVP-N9000es
    Squeezebox Duet
    Theta ProBasic IIIA
    Audio Research SP14
    White Audio Labs B1
    Transparent SoundWave Super
    Paradigm Studio Monitor
    B&W 802 s3

    HT
    Sony Bravia KDL-40Z4100
    Sony BDP-S350
    Yamaha HTR-5790
    NHT SB3 (Fronts)
    NHT SC2 (center)
    NHT SB2 (surround)
    Velodyne FSR12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    dc55110 wrote: »
    Yeah, did that... and they don't lie...
    2007 Green Bay Packers: Total Rushing Yards - 1597 (21st), Yards per game 99.8 (21st), Yards per carry - 4.1 (13th)
    2008 Green Bay Packers: Total Rushing yards - 1805 (17th), Yards per game - 112.8 (17th), YPC - 4.1 (11th)
    Now I don't know what stat or stats you are looking at. But I don't think the Packers are #2 in any of them.



    When we were talking about the Team rushing stats, we were talking about GRANT being #2 in rushing only to PETERSON since GRANT joined the packers. You dont seem to be able to comprehend very well.
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AsSiMiLaTeD
    AsSiMiLaTeD Posts: 11,728
    edited November 2009
    Wow, really?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Zoomzilla
    Zoomzilla Posts: 76
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    Well then I guess the vikings suck just a little less because like you said the packers suck and the vikings barely won both games.

    Do you drink paint thinner?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dc55110
    dc55110 Posts: 128
    edited November 2009
    woodsman10b wrote: »
    When we were talking about the Team rushing stats, we were talking about GRANT being #2 in rushing only to PETERSON since GRANT joined the packers. You dont seem to be able to comprehend very well.

    That is why I asked you what your ranking criteria was... Grant in 2008 was #8 with 1203 and in 2007 he was #19 with 956. In 2008, his best season, he wasn't even #2 in the division.

    So if the criteria was: who is the better rusher between Peterson or Grant... then yes Grant is number two!

    Who did you hear he was #2 from? Wayne Larrivee & Larry McCarren?
    (((STEREO)))
    Sony DVP-N9000es
    Squeezebox Duet
    Theta ProBasic IIIA
    Audio Research SP14
    White Audio Labs B1
    Transparent SoundWave Super
    Paradigm Studio Monitor
    B&W 802 s3

    HT
    Sony Bravia KDL-40Z4100
    Sony BDP-S350
    Yamaha HTR-5790
    NHT SB3 (Fronts)
    NHT SC2 (center)
    NHT SB2 (surround)
    Velodyne FSR12
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • woodsman10b
    woodsman10b Posts: 408
    edited November 2009
    dc55110 wrote: »
    That is why I asked you what your ranking criteria was... Grant in 2008 was #8 with 1203 and in 2007 he was #19 with 956. In 2008, his best season, he wasn't even #2 in the division.

    So if the criteria was: who is the better rusher between Peterson or Grant... then yes Grant is number two!

    Who did you hear he was #2 from? Wayne Larrivee & Larry McCarren?

    No actually it was from Troy Aikman, then when I went back this morning and listened to his comment I found that he said 3rd in the NFC. Peterson is #1 since the second game of 07, with Portis 2nd and Grant 3rd since his start with the Pack. I stand corrected! :confused:
    Most of them only hear how loud it sounds, and the rest of us hear everything else - :rolleyes:
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter