Anyone know why the RT20's were so expensive?

trubluluc
trubluluc Posts: 2,067
edited November 2004 in Speakers
I'm assuming it was cutting edge technology, and they had to recoup some R&D costs.

Because on paper, the RT2000:
hit lower and with twice the sub power,
It has a higher efficiency,
and higher upper end as well.
And they weigh 10 lbs more (also a good thing)

And the RT2000's sold for $1200 less.

Am I missing something?

RT2000

http://www.polkaudio.com/home/specs.php?recent=1&category=3&speaker=88

RT20

http://www.polkaudio.com/home/specs.php?category=3&speaker=311&vintage=1

-Luc
Post edited by trubluluc on

Comments