Comparison of A9's vs. LSIM707's anyone?

arcman
arcman Posts: 5
I hate the boxy cabs on my Rti12's. (same guts as A9's) I'm now thinking of getting a pair of the 707's, which I think are a much better looking speaker. My wife thinks so too.

Since the only dealer Polk said had these on the floor was in NYC, and being 1,000 miles away, I'm not going to get to demo them. That's a chance I'll take. I'm assuming these will be a more accurate speaker but I am concerned about how loud these can go compared to the A9's. I currently have a NAD C370 and a C270 running mono to each channel, which more than fills the need for volume.

I also have a pair of Lsi9's, a very nice sounding speaker, that I really like but the listening level at the same volume settings as the 12's is night and day.

Wondering if anyone here has compared the Rti12/A9's to the 707's? Does being down 88db to 90db efficiency make that much of a difference in loudness?

Appreciate any info.

Thanks.

Comments

  • mlistens03
    mlistens03 Posts: 2,767
    arcman wrote: »
    I hate the boxy cabs on my Rti12's. (same guts as A9's) I'm now thinking of getting a pair of the 707's, which I think are a much better looking speaker. My wife thinks so too.

    Since the only dealer Polk said had these on the floor was in NYC, and being 1,000 miles away, I'm not going to get to demo them. That's a chance I'll take. I'm assuming these will be a more accurate speaker but I am concerned about how loud these can go compared to the A9's. I currently have a NAD C370 and a C270 running mono to each channel, which more than fills the need for volume.

    I also have a pair of Lsi9's, a very nice sounding speaker, that I really like but the listening level at the same volume settings as the 12's is night and day.

    Wondering if anyone here has compared the Rti12/A9's to the 707's? Does being down 88db to 90db efficiency make that much of a difference in loudness?

    Appreciate any info.

    Thanks.

    It will not. Another thing is that the LSiMs are much easier to drive than you RTI12s. One last thing, you said you like your LSis better, the LSiMs are many times more accurate/more fun/better than the LSi series.
    Micah
  • rpf65
    rpf65 Posts: 2,127
    I went from RTI A5’s to LSI M705’s, and found the 705’s much better speakers for music.

    When I had the A5’s, I used to listen to them around the 65-70dB range. They sounded fairly loud, but not excessively so.

    Switched to the 705’s, and one evening I had to go outside for something or other, and left the cd playing. I was able to hear the music playing fairly far away from the door. Grabbed the spl meter, and found the music was playing at around 85 dB.

    I didn’t realize the volume was that loud, thought I was playing them about as loud as the A5’s. Few days later, the neighbor’s kid commented that he heard my music turned up again, so I guess this was going on for a while.

    Guess what I’m trying to say is with the different sound signature you may actually play the 707’s measurably louder than your 12’s without realizing it.

    Wouldn’t really worry about efficiency ratings too much. Better to have better sound than a better measurement.
  • tonyb
    tonyb Posts: 32,902
    I would take those Nads out of mono mode. The 12's require current and can dip well below 8 ohms. Running the Nads in mono is only suggested for an 8 ohm speaker, which most amps in mono don't like anything below 8 ohms. Your probably sacrificing some sound quality for loudness.

    That said, the LSIM series you'll find much more pleasing for music than the RTI series.....but even then I'd still just use the bigger Nad and not run mono.
    HT SYSTEM-
    Sony 850c 4k
    Pioneer elite vhx 21
    Sony 4k BRP
    SVS SB-2000
    Polk Sig. 20's
    Polk FX500 surrounds

    Cables-
    Acoustic zen Satori speaker cables
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2 IC's
    Wireworld eclipse 7 ic's
    Audio metallurgy ga-o digital cable

    Kitchen

    Sonos zp90
    Grant Fidelity tube dac
    B&k 1420
    lsi 9's
  • adabro
    adabro Posts: 212
    Can't answer your specific question, but I went from the A9's to the 705'sand loved the change. I found the 705's much 'nicer' for music.
  • mrloren
    mrloren Posts: 2,454
    I went from RTi8 to signature S60, Music improvement is outstanding. RTi line is geared more for Home Theater than music.

    If you're getting a deal on the LSiM then go for it.
    When I was a kid my parents told me to turn it down. Now I'm an adult and my kids tell me to turn it down.
    Family Room:LG QNED80 75", Onkyo RZ50 Emotiva XPA3 GEN3 Oppo BDP-93,Sony UBP-X800BM. Main: Polk LsiM 705Center: Polk LSiM 704CFront High/Rear High In-Ceiling Polk 80F/X RT Surrounds: Polk S15 Sub: HSU VTF3-MK5
    Bed Room; Marantz SR5010, BDP-S270Main: Polk Signature S20Center: Polk Signature S35Rear: Polk R15 Sub: SVS SB2000
    Working Warehouse; Yamaha A-S301, Sony DVP-NS3100ES for disc Plok TSX550T SVS PB2000 Mini tower PC with 400GB of music
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 49,704
    I also have a pair of Lsi9's, a very nice sounding speaker, that I really like but the listening level at the same volume settings as the 12's is night and day.

    Well yeah! One is a 4 ohm speaker while the other is an 8 ohm speaker.

    Looks wise, the RTiA series look much better than the LSiM and the cherry version has real cherry veneer. Sound wise for music the LSiM is much better.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • arcman
    arcman Posts: 5
    tonyb,

    Other than when these amps had some loosened solder joints (a common problem with them), I've never heard any signs of distortion whatsoever, and I'm talking at some seriously high volumes. With two subs, I need no more volume. A little more accuracy might be nice but I don't want to trade it off for loudness.

    The 707's are rated at 300w vs. 500 for the 12's. Not knowing the ins and outs of impedances and loads, I'm a bit concerned cranking up a 300 watt amp into them will put the package into the fatigue zone.

    I love the Rti12's. Again, I'm just hoping to get a smidge more accurate sound, similar volume levels and a better looking piece of furniture.

    The integrated C370 in bridged mono mode is rated 300w into a 8 ohm load. The C270 is the power amp version. The Rti12's are 8 ohm's. I'm curious why you think there's an issue here?

    Here's something copied from NAD's **** sheet about their circuitry...

    Impedance Sensing Circuit (ISC):

    The C370 also benefits from NAD's proprietary Impedance Sensing Circuit
    (ISC) topology, now well established and used in many NAD models including
    the highly reviewed C320 and C340.

    The ISC topology allows the C370 to deliver maximum performance under
    virtually any circumstance, independent of the loudspeakers it is driving. The
    circuitry automatically senses the impedance characteristics of the loudspeaker and will then adjust its power supply settings to best cope with that specific
    load. With ISC topology, the relationship of voltage to current is kept at an
    ideal proportion, eliminating the current limiting distortion common in lesser
    designs. This also gives it an unusual characteristic compared to traditional
    amplifiers when measuring its continuous output power; the RMS output power remains the same at 120 Watts with either an eight or a four ohms
    load. This is not unusual for NAD however.
    NAD takes a stance to the mindless "brochure power" approach which doesn't give a realistic indication of an amplifier's true capabilities. Instead, the
    ISC topology is a practical approach to enable an amplifier to easily deal with
    musical dynamics and difficult speaker loads. More meaningful in the real
    world are the C370's dynamic capabilities; up to 450 Watts into 2 ohms and
    up to 70 amps current capability into 1 ohm!
  • Mikey081057
    Mikey081057 Posts: 7,127
    I have had and heard most of the Polk line and to me the best sounding and balanced of the bunch was the 705's. The 707's were a bit boomy/bloated for my taste. Save some $$$ and put it towards a nice svs sub to go with the 705's. They are ok for music and ok for HT. If music is your bag then there are many better options out there than any of the Polks. The (VR3 modded) Lsi 9's were my second favorite pair of Polks.
    My New Year's resolution is 3840 × 2160

    Family Room| Marantz AV7704| Usher Dancer Mini - 2 DMD Mains |Usher Dancer Mini-x DMD's Surrounds | Usher BE-616 DMD Center | SVS Ultra Rear Surrounds | Parasound Halo A21 | Parsound Halo A52+ | MIT Shotgun S3's | Dual SVS SB 4000 Ultras | Oppo UDP 203 | Directv Genie HD DVR | Samsung 75" Q8 QLED | PSAudio Stellar GCD | Mytek Brooklyn DAC+ | Lumin U1 Mini | HP Elite Slice PC | ROON'd for life |

    ManCave: HT:Polk LSiM 706VR3 LSiM 703's LSiM 702's|| Marantz AV7002 AV PrePro Sunfire TGA-7401| Sony PS4 Pro| Sony PS4 Pro|SVS PB13 Ultra| Oppo UDP 203 | Music Hall MMF 5.3se TT w/ Soundsmith Carmen | Samsung 55" SUHD TV | Sony PS4

    Patio | Polk Atrium 8's | Yamaha R-N303BL |

    Office BlueSound Node| KEF LS50 | Peactree Nova 125SE |

    Bedroom | Focal 905's | Chromecast Audio |

    Garage | Polk Monitor 5B's

    Closet Yamaha M80 | 2 Polk MP3K subs| Yaqin MC100B with Shuguang Treasures KT 88's & CV181Z's | Tesla E83CC's | Marantz 2252B | Marantz 2385 |Polk SDA SRS 2.3 | LSiM 705's |
  • F1nut
    F1nut Posts: 49,704
    The 707's are rated at 300w vs. 500 for the 12's. Not knowing the ins and outs of impedances and loads, I'm a bit concerned cranking up a 300 watt amp into them will put the package into the fatigue zone.

    Meaningless spec.
    The integrated C370 in bridged mono mode is rated 300w into a 8 ohm load. The C270 is the power amp version. The Rti12's are 8 ohm's. I'm curious why you think there's an issue here?

    Bridging causes the noise floor to rise.



    I agree with Mikey, the 705's are the best of that lot.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


    President of Club Polk

  • jeremymarcinko
    jeremymarcinko Posts: 3,785
    edited June 2018
    I have the RTI12s in the HT and LSM705s in the 2ch. Both are great speakers but the 705’s easily bring the most enjoyment musically, even if they’re a little less accurate. The 12’s accuracy is spot on, given a decent room, but will take a lot of current to be musical given its ruler flat frequency response. The 705s do a fantastic job with a whole lot less.
    Oh, Listen here mister. We got no way of understandin' this world. But we got as much sense of this bird flyin in the sky. Now there is a lot that bird don't know, but it don't change the fact that the world is happening to him all the same. What I am tryin to say is, is that the course of your life, well its changing, and you don't even see it- Forest Bondurant