Yamaha amplifiers

Just curious how you guys feel about yamaha amplifiers? Currently have a mx-630 with a nad 1130 preamp. have been looking at a c-70/m-70 setup but not sure on a price. Also open to other brands just not sure what to look for. I have seen a couple adcoms for sale im my area of minneapolis as well.
Monitor 4.6, 5jr, 5, 7, 10, 11. RTA 8TL. RTA 11T. SDA 2B.
«1

Comments

  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 2,779
    Yammy's seem to be well received here ( I have a low class receiver in the garage at the moment that I can't really hate on) but I'm curious if you have ever put a NAD amp behind the NAD pre?

    I also just nabbed an Adcom from the FS section to play with. No impressions yet :/
  • pitdogg2pitdogg2 Posts: 10,841
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    I don't mind them.

    16013994074_3405e2a9d8_b.jpgDSC_0241 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    Ok but you must USE them.....
  • mn_polk_guymn_polk_guy Posts: 55
    I havent seen a nad amp around yet, the nad and yamaha came together.
    Monitor 4.6, 5jr, 5, 7, 10, 11. RTA 8TL. RTA 11T. SDA 2B.
  • lightman1lightman1 Posts: 9,862
    Stop showing off, Doc. It's unbecoming of a gentleman such as yourself.
  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 2,779
    I havent seen a nad amp around yet, the nad and yamaha came together.

    I've had lots of good luck on eBay... Just saying.
  • SchurkeySchurkey Posts: 1,767
    edited May 14
    I think Yamaha used to be better than they are now. I've never owned a Yamaha amp or receiver. If I was going to, it'd be an older one. And I'd be REALLY CAREFUL about verifying the 4-ohm specs.

    They can still build a competent amp...but you'd better be prepared to dig deep into the wallet before taking it home.

    Last I looked, if you wanted REAL 4-ohm capability, you were looking at $1600 and up. Phony 4-ohm capability was what the less-expensive offerings had--a switch on the back panel that strangles the power supply so the poor thing doesn't cook into a "low impedance" load. (I don't consider 4-ohm nominal to be "low" impedance...but Yamaha does.)
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
    edited May 14
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    I don't mind them.

    16013994074_3405e2a9d8_b.jpgDSC_0241 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    Ok but you must USE them.....

    Oh.
    Like this?

    15940929034_fa573ba218_b.jpgDSC_0184 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    16563527245_48436966ec_b.jpgDSC_0182 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    Or like this, maybe?

    12312777693_480440b67e_b.jpgP1020541 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    :)

    Vintage Polk Audio Monitor Series loudspeakers* like vintage Yamaha amplification, IMO/IME.
    ______________
    * or vintage a/d/s loudspeakers, for that matter :)

  • la2vegasla2vegas Posts: 2,801
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    I don't mind them.

    16013994074_3405e2a9d8_b.jpgDSC_0241 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    Ok but you must USE them.....

    Oh.
    Like this?

    15940929034_fa573ba218_b.jpgDSC_0184 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    16563527245_48436966ec_b.jpgDSC_0182 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    Or like this, maybe?

    12312777693_480440b67e_b.jpgP1020541 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    :)

    Vintage Polk Audio Monitor Series loudspeakers* like vintage Yamaha amplification, IMO/IME.
    ______________
    * or vintage a/d/s loudspeakers, for that matter :)

    You'd better not proclaim any of those to be dump finds or I might officially be jealous. :'(
    2.3TL, 3.1TL, SDA 2B, SDA II, 7B, 7C, 7 series 2, 10B, 5JR+, 5JR, 5A, 4.5, 4, RTA 11T X2 pairs, RTA 8T, LSI9, LSI7, RTI A7, RTI A3, CSI A4, CSI A6, F/XI A4, RTI4. That's all for now.
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
    Nope, neither of those was (a dump find).
    The CA-610II I bought new from Soundscape in Baltimore, MD -- in (if memory serves) 1978. It has served admirably for nigh-on four decades, with one repair (when we lived in California).

    The CA-800 I bought used but restored some years back. It is a very good sounding amplifier -- almost amazingly so when set to Class A operation (for something like 10 wpc).
  • dromundsdromunds Posts: 7,182
    Yes, a buddy up the road from me has a CR-800 that he bought new with Large Advents, and I am constantly amazed at how good that baby sounds. ;)
  • codycatalistcodycatalist Posts: 1,621
    edited May 16
    eaxdmh9s1t8c.jpg


    I found this AV34 at a thrift store for $25. It has served me VERY well in the two years I have been using it, a stout 100 watts that drives my SDA2Bs without strain. Although not a looker she sounds pretty good.
    Living room

    Mains: Paradigm 90P
    Lows: Velodyne CHT12, Pioneer SW-8Mk2
    Power: Marantz SR7000
    Tv: Samsung UHD 55' Curved 4k

    2 Channel Den

    Mains: SDA2B Upgraded XOs and Binding Posts
    Pre: Denon PRA-1200
    Power: Adcom GFA-545
    TT: Pioneer PL510
    Tv: Samsung UHD 55' 4K

    Noggin Rockin'

    Phillips L2
    Grado SE80
    Harman Kardon CL
    Little dot 1+/GE JAN 5654w

    Closet of Dreams:

    Harman Kardon AVR130
    Yamaha HTR5590
    Polk RTA11TL
    Polk TSI200s
    New Large Advents 25th Anniversary Edition
    Bravo V2/RCA Clear top Conn branded 12AU7
    Yamaha AV-34

    "Temptation is the manifestation of desire which equals necessity." - Mikey081057
    " I have always had a champange taste with a beer budget" - Rick88
    "Just because the thread is getting views don't mean much .. I like a good train wreck doesn't mean i want to be in one..." - pitdogg2
    "Those that don't know, don't know that they don't know." - heiney9
  • Tony MTony M Posts: 6,085
    eaxdmh9s1t8c.jpg


    I found this AV34 at a thrift store for $25. It has served me VERY well in the two years I have been using it, a stout 100 watts that drives my SDA2Bs without strain. Although not a looker she sounds pretty good.

    I believe that was my first surround sound receiver I ever bought new. Used it for 20 years! :p B) :)
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
  • mlistens03mlistens03 Posts: 2,142
    eaxdmh9s1t8c.jpg


    I found this AV34 at a thrift store for $25. It has served me VERY well in the two years I have been using it, a stout 100 watts that drives my SDA2Bs without strain. Although not a looker she sounds pretty good.

    I think that looks awesome! I love receivers with that kind of design for some reason. Kind similar looking to my new Technics:
    18uxnee68yz3.jpg
    Your Yamaha probably sounds way better though.
    Not Tom, or Trey, or Jim
    NAD C352
    Monitor Audio Radius R90’s/Mission Freedom 770 IV
    BJC speaker cables, generic RCA’s, one homemade power cable, because that’s going to do any good with the rest of the generic ones.
    Technics SL3200 turntable and a Shure M97xE phono cartridge
    Velodyne VA-907 subwoofer
    Lafayette LR-1100 acting as a tuner and phono.
    I've always thought the goal of high end audio was not to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Turn that darn music down' but to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Tell your friends to go home and you can practice later this week'.
  • Viking64Viking64 Posts: 3,278
    Micah, I bought a Technics RS-M205 cassette deck in 1982. Just look at this beast! :p

    4lyctyhlcejm.jpg
  • mlistens03mlistens03 Posts: 2,142
    edited May 17
    Viking64 wrote: »
    Micah, I bought a Technics RS-M205 cassette deck in 1982. Just look at this beast! :p

    4lyctyhlcejm.jpg

    :open_mouth: I wouldn’t even use that, but I want it just because it’s SO COOL! :tongue:
    Not Tom, or Trey, or Jim
    NAD C352
    Monitor Audio Radius R90’s/Mission Freedom 770 IV
    BJC speaker cables, generic RCA’s, one homemade power cable, because that’s going to do any good with the rest of the generic ones.
    Technics SL3200 turntable and a Shure M97xE phono cartridge
    Velodyne VA-907 subwoofer
    Lafayette LR-1100 acting as a tuner and phono.
    I've always thought the goal of high end audio was not to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Turn that darn music down' but to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Tell your friends to go home and you can practice later this week'.
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
    ahem. This is a Yamaha thread -- just sayin'.

    ;)

    ok1rqv43dkiu.png

    (In the interest of full disclosure -- the Yamaha TC-1000 looks considerably more impressive than it actually is. Yamaha did make some pretty good cassette decks, though... like the K-1000, an example of which, sadly, I do not have.)
  • Viking64Viking64 Posts: 3,278
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    ahem. This is a Yamaha thread -- just sayin'.

    ;)
    Duly noted, sir. :)

    ddirnodmfb88.jpg

    53hx79liky7e.jpg




  • mlistens03mlistens03 Posts: 2,142
    Viking64 wrote: »
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    ahem. This is a Yamaha thread -- just sayin'.

    ;)
    Duly noted, sir. :)

    ddirnodmfb88.jpg

    53hx79liky7e.jpg




    Getting closer, at least your in the Yamaha category. Just gotta work on that whole “correct company branch” thing. :tongue:
    Not Tom, or Trey, or Jim
    NAD C352
    Monitor Audio Radius R90’s/Mission Freedom 770 IV
    BJC speaker cables, generic RCA’s, one homemade power cable, because that’s going to do any good with the rest of the generic ones.
    Technics SL3200 turntable and a Shure M97xE phono cartridge
    Velodyne VA-907 subwoofer
    Lafayette LR-1100 acting as a tuner and phono.
    I've always thought the goal of high end audio was not to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Turn that darn music down' but to have your neighbors bang on the wall and say, 'Tell your friends to go home and you can practice later this week'.
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
    ^^^ much better. :p


    32123265053_78f0e3cd7b_b.jpgP1030008 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    32575671260_8043de3163_b.jpgNS15frontal by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
  • Viking64Viking64 Posts: 3,278
    mlistens03 wrote: »

    Getting closer, at least your in the Yamaha category. Just gotta work on that whole “correct company branch” thing. :tongue:
    :p

    Here's a link to another good Yamaha thread to get us back on track.

    http://forum.polkaudio.com/discussion/181126/yamaha-then-and-or-now/p1

  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
  • pitdogg2pitdogg2 Posts: 10,841
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    ^^^ much better. :p


    32123265053_78f0e3cd7b_b.jpgP1030008 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    32575671260_8043de3163_b.jpgNS15frontal by Mark Hardy, on Flickr


    Interest peaked... spill it Doc !
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 19,052
    edited May 18
    pitdogg2 wrote: »
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    ^^^ much better. :p


    32123265053_78f0e3cd7b_b.jpgP1030008 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    32575671260_8043de3163_b.jpgNS15frontal by Mark Hardy, on Flickr


    Interest peaked... spill it Doc !
    What, really? You never saw one of Yamaha's famous ear speakers? :p

    7dfb9pkeu7db.png
    4r3tlqoz9t6o.png

    That is a single NS-15. Found it at the dump and ultimately gave it away -- what were the odds of finding another single? :)

    Yamaha sold several variants of the same basic design -- many were for pro/commercial audio (sound reinforcement) but some, like the NS-15, were for domestic use.

    The NS-15 is particularly interesting as it is essentially just an open baffle. Here're some photos of the flip side.

    32123264943_07f871d760_b.jpgP1030011 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    32123264933_3edfd02583_b.jpgP1030013 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr
    32123264973_1ea6d57545_b.jpgP1030009 by Mark Hardy, on Flickr

    "How does it sound?" I hear you ask. :)

    Actually, I thought it sounded decent. Very sensitive -- it wasn't the kind of loudspeaker I'd build a mono system around, though... and it wasn't anything so special it seemed worth waiting a decade or two to find a mate. Besides, chances are I'd have found a pair... and then I'd have had three, which wouldn't be an improvement ;)

  • heiney9heiney9 Posts: 23,863
    edited May 18
    Yamaha = boring to me. The "M" amps were pretty over-hyped then, and still are, IMO. So were the pre's that went with them. I'd take a Nak CA-5 over a Yam C-70 any day.

    Natural Sound = lifeless and boring.

    I never connected with any Yammy stuff. Sold it for years because that's what people wanted back in the day. A sales commission is a sales commission, but personally I preferred Nakamichi, Luxman and Adcom of the day.

    Just my .02c since you asked

    H9

    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Plus DAC | MIT Shotgun S3 | MIT Z P/C's | updated SDA 1C| SQ Box Touch/Welbourne Labs P/S- Tubes add soul!
  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 2,779
    Not to derail the thread, but I can't seem to find any Nakamichi anywhere anymore.

    But anywho, I agree with heiney, my yammy is rather lifeless, that's why it's in the garage and being replaced.
  • pitdogg2pitdogg2 Posts: 10,841
    nope never seen nor heard them Doc. interesting.

    I liked my Yamaha integrated amps I had. I never had any amps. But those Nak's were and still are very nice..
  • heiney9heiney9 Posts: 23,863
    edited May 18
    The only problem with the Nak stuff and to a certain extent the older Yammy stuff is they need refreshing by now. I had a Nak CA-5 pre for quite awhile (built in 1987, IIRC and bought used in about 1990) and I had to have some caps replaced on or around 2007-2008 before I sold it. They started making noise.

    This older gear is sometimes not worth the hassle unless your good under the hood, as paying a tech to do it gets pricey fast. Or they've been verifiably serviced.

    H9
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass

    Pass Aleph 30 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Plus DAC | MIT Shotgun S3 | MIT Z P/C's | updated SDA 1C| SQ Box Touch/Welbourne Labs P/S- Tubes add soul!
  • codycatalistcodycatalist Posts: 1,621
    Viking64 wrote: »
    Sometimes I listen to Yammy amplifiers and sometimes I listen to Laurel amplifiers.

    I see what you did there =P
    Living room

    Mains: Paradigm 90P
    Lows: Velodyne CHT12, Pioneer SW-8Mk2
    Power: Marantz SR7000
    Tv: Samsung UHD 55' Curved 4k

    2 Channel Den

    Mains: SDA2B Upgraded XOs and Binding Posts
    Pre: Denon PRA-1200
    Power: Adcom GFA-545
    TT: Pioneer PL510
    Tv: Samsung UHD 55' 4K

    Noggin Rockin'

    Phillips L2
    Grado SE80
    Harman Kardon CL
    Little dot 1+/GE JAN 5654w

    Closet of Dreams:

    Harman Kardon AVR130
    Yamaha HTR5590
    Polk RTA11TL
    Polk TSI200s
    New Large Advents 25th Anniversary Edition
    Bravo V2/RCA Clear top Conn branded 12AU7
    Yamaha AV-34

    "Temptation is the manifestation of desire which equals necessity." - Mikey081057
    " I have always had a champange taste with a beer budget" - Rick88
    "Just because the thread is getting views don't mean much .. I like a good train wreck doesn't mean i want to be in one..." - pitdogg2
    "Those that don't know, don't know that they don't know." - heiney9
«1
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!