Monitor 10 series 2 tweeter

Posts: 241
edited April 2010 in Vintage Speakers
What tweeter does the monitor 10 series 2 use? Is there an original and a replacement part?
Post edited by aloutah on

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Comments

  • Posts: 5,877
    edited April 2010
    Mine had SL2500's. Not sure about replacements, never had to replace any. Call Polk CS and see if they're still available.
    Ludicrous gibs!
  • Posts: 241
    edited April 2010
    I bought a pair of monitor 10 series 2 recently. The guy i bought them from said he had blown the tweeters and had them replaced. I havent opened them up yet, and was just curious what the proper and/or replacement tweeters were.
  • Posts: 1,243
    edited April 2010
    Take the tweeters out (it is easy; just unscrew 4 screws carefully) and see what they say on the back. Then call Polk CS at 800-377-POLK and tell the nice people there that you are a member of Club Polk and they will help you right out, and the last time I did that it was 20% off and free shipping (but they do charge tax in all 50 states, I believe).
    "Don't forget to change your politician. They are like diapers they need to be changed regularly, and for the same reason."
  • Posts: 2,575
    edited April 2010
    I would jot the serial numbers down and have them ready for Polk CS to look up the correct tweeters. The other fella may not have replaced them with the proper parts.
  • Posts: 5,877
    edited April 2010
    aloutah wrote: »
    I bought a pair of monitor 10 series 2 recently. The guy i bought them from said he had blown the tweeters and had them replaced. I havent opened them up yet, and was just curious what the proper and/or replacement tweeters were.

    The Monitor 10 Series II's were the last run of the Monitor 10's. My original drivers were all dated 1991, and the tweeters were the SL2500's as stated before. I don't know if Polk has replaced them with a different part number in the meantime, like they did for the SL2000's.

    They looked like this -

    imag0005.jpg

    Note the foam ring around the tweeter.
    Ludicrous gibs!
  • Posts: 25,254
    edited April 2010
    Series II Monitors used the sl2500 originally, very similar to the sl3000.

    IIRC, the RD0198-1 is the correct replacement part.
    "Appreciation of audio is a completely subjective human experience. Measurements can provide a measure of insight, but are no substitute for human judgment. Why are we looking to reduce a subjective experience to objective criteria anyway? The subtleties of music and audio reproduction are for those who appreciate it. Differentiation by numbers is for those who do not".--Nelson Pass Pass Labs XA25 | EE Avant Pre | EE Mini Max Supreme DAC | MIT Shotgun S1 | Puritan Audio PSM136 Pwr Condtioner & Classic PC's | Legend L600 | BlueSound Node3 - Tubes add soul!
  • Posts: 2,433
    edited April 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    Series II Monitors used the sl2500 originally, very similar to the sl3000.

    IIRC, the RD0198-1 is the correct replacement part.

    This is correct.
    Jay
    SDA 2BTL * McCormack DNA 0.5 amp * Oppo BDP-93 * Modded Adcom GDA-600 DAC * Rythmik F8 (x2)
    Micro Seiki DQ-50 * Hagerman Cornet 2 Phono * A hodgepodge of cabling * Belkin PF60
    Preamp rotation: Krell KSL (SCompRacer recapped) * Manley Shrimp * PS Audio 5.0
  • Posts: 241
    edited April 2010
    Thanks, I just havent had the time to check, and knew there are some very knowledgeable people on this forum. I just wanted to make sure he hadnt replaced them with the wrong part.
  • Posts: 6,745
    edited April 2010
    heiney9 wrote: »
    Series II Monitors used the sl2500 originally, very similar to the sl3000.

    IIRC, the RD0198-1 is the correct replacement part.


    That.^^^
    The nirvana inducer-
    APC H10 Power Conditioner
    Marantz UD5005 universal player
    Parasound Halo P5 preamp
    Parasound HCA-1200II power amp
    PolkAudio LSi9's/PolkAudio SDA 2A's/PolkAudio Monitor 7A's
    Audioquest Speaker Cables and IC's
  • Posts: 241
    edited April 2010
    Curt what are you referring to with your post of "that.^^^"?
  • Posts: 5,877
    edited April 2010
    He's essentially saying that heiney9 was correct in what he was saying.
    Ludicrous gibs!
  • Posts: 241
    edited April 2010
    nadams wrote: »
    He's essentially saying that heiney9 was correct in what he was saying.[/QUOTE

    Just curious. Thanks

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.