Tired of being a mere 'Polkster'?

1394041424345»

Comments

  • afterburntafterburnt Posts: 2,923
    Grandad always said, "better to be a Polker than a Polkie". Sorry, I am lying again (as usual) I never had a Grandad.
  • WillowWillow Posts: 8,663
    The only people who loved him where...
  • txcoastal1txcoastal1 Posts: 7,459
    the nuns at the monastery liked
  • WillowWillow Posts: 8,663
    To get him on his knees to...
  • F1nutF1nut Posts: 37,329
    paddle his fanny, but......
  • F1nutF1nut Posts: 37,329
    You've got to be kidding me.....f a n n y is censored!?! This is worse than preschool.
  • WillowWillow Posts: 8,663
    F1nut wrote: »
    You've got to be kidding me.....f a n n y is censored!?! This is worse than preschool.

    Pretty sad. I do however like your avatar
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 13,897
    Well, in the UK, that word (f-a-n-n-y) refers to a different part of the anatomy than it does in Amurrica -- and this forum is a global resource, you know? ;)

    5796a643-da54-450e-996d-5284585f46aa_1000.jpg
  • afterburnt wrote: »
    Grandad always said, "better to be a Polker than a Polkie". Sorry, I am lying again (as usual) I never had a Grandad.

    Is that genetically possible?

    Kinda like the March Madness NCAA Basketball brackets:

    128 - great, great, great, great, great, great, great grandfaters
    64 - great, great, great, great, great, great grandfathers
    32 - great, great, great, great, great grandfathers
    16 - great, great, great, great grandfathers
    8 - great, great, great grandfathers
    4 - great, great grandfaters
    2 - grandfathers
    1 - father.

    The good news to be gleaned from the above table is that, if we go back in time far enough, we are related. Hi cousin!
  • LasareathLasareath Posts: 29
    Lord
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 13,897
    I think "lordy" was last week's word...

    ;)
  • txcoastal1txcoastal1 Posts: 7,459
    edited June 16
    Speaking of last week, I was driving my new Leaf, ....
  • mrbigbluelightmrbigbluelight Posts: 7,027
    mhardy6647 wrote: »
    Well, in the UK, the word (f-a-n-n-y) refers to a different part of the anatomy than it does in Amurrica -- and this forum is a global resource, you know? ;)

    Good point ! I was thinking about the troubles that posting this pic may pose on an international level, specifically with the Brits that you mentioned.

    r8j9j8c7pfv4.jpg

    We would all agree, IMO, that this young couple are apparently behaving in an appropriate social manner. They are, as shown in the still photograph, a suitable distance apart, observing the necessary proprieties. They are both dressed in casual evening wear that appears to be neat and clean. The same could be said for their hair stylings.
    I was going to suggest (while not being judgement) that they may wish to consider the remote possibility that laying one's 45's and LP's are best not left out on the carpet.
    Then I realized ..... the carpet. The TYPE of carpet, who's name I shan't even mention here ! It's name, in Britain, is a slang term for ....well ..... naughty things. :o

    And our good neighbors to the North also have things that trigger them. For instance, the mere mention of a particular brand of peanut butter has been known to drive them into a frenzy. The following pic, with the offending term politely obscured to spare feelings, show the offending culprit:

    lohca6h99klb.jpg

    I'm not sure if that applies to both the "Creamy" version (as shown) or also to the "Chunky" version.
    I'd suggest that we avoid the mention of either to be safe.

    Well, that's all I've got ! Be safe and be comfy
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 13,897
    Shagadelic.

Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!