for those of "us" (it's not just me, is it?) interested in vintage literature, ads, etc.

Just last night, I realized that one can easily and pretty effectively search the
magnificent collections of hifi magazine scans (and much, much more) at https://www.americanradiohistory.com

Thus:

bzpktl9xmex7.png

see the 'search' button (magnifying glass)? :smiley:

6idldxkxyxyb.png

voila!

B)

6d8t53svxdbb.png

(needless to say, the 1950s references won't be to Polk Audio content. Note also that the results can be displayed by date, or limited by decade)

Stereo Review and High Fidelity PDF scan databases are likewise searchable.

These are marvelous times in which we live :)

Comments

  • xschopxschop Posts: 866
    I hope all this ardent reading is being accompanied by extraneous listening sessions. If not, you sir, need a vacation.
  • rooftop59rooftop59 Posts: 4,588
    I think Dr. H’s retirement life is a vacation...
    HT Rig:
    Denon AVR-X4200w; Peachtree Audio Nova Integrated; Bryson BPD-1; Mains: Dynaudio Emit 10 + MartinLogan Dynamo (original) sub; Center - Polk cs400i; Heights, Center Surround - Klipsch KHC - 6 In-Ceiling; Surrounds - Monoprice in-ceiling; Sub - SVS PB10-ISD; LG UP870 4K BDP

    Master Bedroom
    Marantz SR-5007; Peachtree Audio NovaPre; Audiosource Amp Two, PSB Imagine B, Boston VR-10 center, NHT Super One CI surrounds, ACI Titan subwoofer, Squeezebox Touch
  • Tony MTony M Posts: 6,022
    I spent about 1/2 hour perusing the 1978 High Fidelity (June?) issue.

    I feel around that time until 1988 was the BEST years for audio products.

    I have most of those audio magazines in magazine format. But looking through the well laid out format of that online link was GREAT and enjoyable too. I love the SALES HYPE from that era. There was a lot of cassette player and the individual cassette improvements ads.

    I still reread my extensive Stereophile and Sound & Vision mags almost daily. My wife thinks it's funny.

    She just asked while the power was down if I had already read my newest stereo magazines already. They came a couple of days before we lost power but I had already checked out most of both magazines. I like reading what people's concerns or observations and opinions are in "letters to the editor" section quite often.

    I did reread about some Triton speakers from some mags I gathered together that have reviews of each model, with a battery powered lantern the other night.
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 18,961
    edited September 19
    Tony M wrote: »
    ...

    I feel around that time until 1988 was the BEST years for audio products.
    I thought kind of like that, myself (more like '75 to '80, in my case) -- until I got to hear top-quality hifi from the 1940s and 1950s. It is an ear-opening experience :)

    Some good stuff from the (early) 1960s, too -- until the manufacturers hopped on the transistor bandwagon and turned out some truly nasty sounding stuff until the industry (and semiconductor technology) caught up with the marketing hype and ss stuff finally started to sound decent.
    I have most of those audio magazines in magazine format. But looking through the well laid out format of that online link was GREAT and enjoyable too. I love the SALES HYPE from that era. There was a lot of cassette player and the individual cassette improvements ads.

    I still reread my extensive Stereophile and Sound & Vision mags almost daily. My wife thinks it's funny.

    She just asked while the power was down if I had already read my newest stereo magazines already. They came a couple of days before we lost power but I had already checked out most of both magazines. I like reading what people's concerns or observations and opinions are in "letters to the editor" section quite often.

    I did reread about some Triton speakers from some mags I gathered together that have reviews of each model, with a battery powered lantern the other night.

    I ditched almost all of my hifi magazines (there's only so much space in the house, you know?), but I concur -- although the PDF archives are a tremendous resource, for which I am profoundly grateful.

  • skrolskrol Posts: 2,649
    Most Excellent!
    Thank you
    Stan

    Main 2ch:
    Polk LSi15 (DB840 upgrade), Parasound: P/LD-1100, HCA-1000A; Denon: DVD-2910, DRM-800A; Monster HTS3600-MKII, Grado SR-225i

    HT:
    Denon AVR-888, Polk: RTA11TL (RDO198-1, XO and Damping Upgrades), S4, CS250, PSW10, Marantz UD5005, Panasonic TC-P42S60

    Other stuff:
    Denon: DRA-835R, DCD-660, DRM-700A, DRR-780; Polk: S8, Monitor 5A, TSi100; Pioneer: CT-6R, PL-530; Onkyo CP-1046F; Ortofon OM5E, Marantz: PM5004, CD5004, Polk: RM7, Parasound C/PT-600, HCA-800ii
  • xschopxschop Posts: 866
    Ok Doc. I confess I peered into the deep abyss and now on the lookout for a classic Pilot amp.
    Are you holding out on the first issue of Stereo Review hehe?2dgrxqjicbz3.png
  • mhardy6647mhardy6647 Posts: 18,961
    The real Pilot stuff was very beautiful (including the ones in the scan above) and also pretty good hifi hardware. By the mid/late 1960s, the Pilot brand was in pretty steep decline, unfortunately, :(
  • Tony MTony M Posts: 6,022
    I think my mom bought a pilot stereo from a yard sale once. I think I remember it being lightweight and cheap feeling.

    I could be wrong though. :#
    Most people just listen to music and watch movies. I EXPERIENCE them.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!