It's time to play:...

FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 85
edited June 6 in Vintage Speakers
*in the best announcer voice I can muster*
"Whaaaat the heck ARE these?!!!" :D



  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 85
    Btw, these ARE Polk, and they're initialed (apparently) by the doctor himself. I just can't decipher the numbers next to the initials...
  • msgmsg Posts: 2,867
    Woh, cool.
  • westmassguywestmassguy Posts: 5,562
    Late 70s Era, Polk Mini Monitors If I'm not mistaken.
  • kevinkokevinko Posts: 126
    You could use these as inspiration for your Monitor remake project and make a giant pair to match.

    "Maxi Monitors," if you will.
  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 85
    edited June 7
    kevinko wrote: »
    You could use these as inspiration for your Monitor remake project and make a giant pair to match.

    "Maxi Monitors," if you will.

    Now there's an idea!!! I like that. The big question would be what tweeter to use to keep the scale somewhat correct?
  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 85
    Malbec wrote: »

    Thank you for the link, but your posted attachments aren't available any longer. Would you be so kind and post them again for a noob?
  • pkquatpkquat Posts: 422
    WOW a very rare set. That is the first I have seen that have the tweeter in the middle. I never new those existed. I have only seen the tweeter on the top.

    There are a few threads on here about redoing the surrounds

    The "Maxi Monitors" in standard form with the tweeter on top could be the considered the M5Jr+ with the 6.5" MW and 6.5" PR, unless "Maxi" would use 8" cones.

    Some old KEF's might work for that. I think they had a 8" PR with a 8" MW that did not use a Uni-Q driver. Although, as I recall people were less impressed with that version, I think because they felt the drivers were not a good quality. I think they were re-purposed from their lower end Uni-Q model, which people were also less impressed with. K160 maybe? There are also the C40D, and C42.
  • FestYboyFestYboy Posts: 85
    Right, I'd have to use 8" drivers, otherwise it would be just a reconfigured 5jr (and that's just too easy :p ).

    Speaking of which, I believe I've found a handful of MWs that will fit the bill along with 2 possible tweets for the M7/10/12+ idea. The issue I kept running into was the match of aesthetics and response to keep the look right. No matter what I do though, I'll need to face plate the tweets. No one makes anything that looks like the peerless in the next size up.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!