MP3 is dead!

13

Comments

  • cfrizzcfrizz Posts: 12,641
    edited May 20
    People want to take their entertainment with them. So portability totally rules. SQ probably doesn't even make it onto anyone's radar unless you're a fanatic like you bunch.

    And as stated, SQ has improved with the higher bit rates of mp3s, so most won't be able to tell the difference or care.

    I love having all my tunes and books on my Samsung Note 2 phone so that I can tune out during my commute to and from work. Some songs sound better than others, but so long as it plays, that's all I care about.

    Can I tell the difference between my mp3s/wavs on the smaller Samsung phone I have acting as my mp3 player vs my cd's? Yes, but being able to sit down at my pc to do whatever, rather than getting up ever 30-90 minutes to change a cd is priceless.

    The bottom line for me is that I can rock out to either very easily, and that is all that is all that's important to me.

    Different strokes for different folks, rock out whichever way makes you feel good.
    Sunfire TGP III PrePro, Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony Bravia KDL-40R510C TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Boston VR-920 Center Channel, SVS NSD-12 SB12 Subwoofer, Polk DSW 400 Subwoofer, Polk FXi-3 Surround Speakers
  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    tonyb wrote: »
    steveinaz wrote: »
    Convenience or quality....take your pick, but don't fool yourself for a millisecond that mp3 is an acceptable format for hi-fi systems.

    The study I read on the subject about 15 years ago compared the quality of Mp3 at various bit rates. I've heard audio lectures at 5 kps and the voice was still distinguishable, but a poor recording. At 64 kps the quality is much improved, but when the audience claps the sound got muddied. The study compared FM radio quality to 80 -96 kps Mp3. At 128kps, only a few people in 1,000 could distinguish the difference between Mp3 and Cds - 128kps was a common bit rate 10 years ago. The study also claimed that at 170kps and above no one could consistently distinguish between Mp3 and CDs. I've personally compared high bit rate Mp3 to many times over the last dozen years and now I've compared it to Flac files. I'll do so again later this summer and next year with some quality headphones. Mp3 gets much, much better at the higher bit rates.

    You can find a study on anything, for or against ....pretty much anything. Rarely is there a consistent viewpoint especially in subjective areas like audio. If MP3's float your boat, rock on....use them and be happy.

    Since we can agree MP3 gets much better at higher bitrates, then we should be able to agree CD quality or lossless files, which are even at higher bitrates, should then sound better, no ? Taking it further, SACD should then sound better than cd and so forth. Generally speaking obviously, because bitrates are not the only thing that makes or breaks good sound.

    Not necessarily. One truth does not automatically equate to another truth based on mere extrapolation.

    All recordings can be extrapolated "down" to an equivalent bit rate.

    The recording itself many times limits the final fidelity. Even though it may have been recorded to "High resolution digital" or High speed Open reel.
    There may be "potential" for better sound, but very few recordings even push the envelope of CD quality sound.

    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    ZLTFUL wrote: »
    MP3s even at 320kbps sound "tinny" to me compared to the same song ripped from the same disc in WAV format.

    An example is a back to back listen of Money for Nothing by Dire Straits where glaring differences are represented even on desktop computer speakers.

    But then I can also tell the difference between a Malbec and Cab Sav. B)

    Then something is drastically wrong. I am not sure what could be wrong, but I can listen to both the WAV file and MP3 320kbps and they both sound quite fantastic even on our big systems.

    In fact they sound incredibly almost identical.
    I doubt it has anything to do with your ability to tell wines/grapes apart, but much more likely an outdated poor quality MP3 encoder.



    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    edited May 20
    :(
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • ZLTFULZLTFUL Posts: 4,117
    edited May 20
    Media Monkey and JRiver are considered some of the best ripping software out there. But you're welcome to try again.

    Or it could be that your ears aren't the end all, be all of listening perfection you believe them to be maybe??

    Not trying to pick a fight but I have proven to some of your "colleagues" (or is it cohorts or even alternate personalities? Hmmm...) that I can differentiate between the two.

    To reiterate my point about wine, if people can taste differently, see differently, smell differently, feel differently, then why is it so god awful hard to believe that someone could possibly hear differently than you? This is the part you people seem to be so hung up on and not willing to even consider.
    "Some people find it easier to be conceited rather than correct."

    "Unwad those panties and have a good time man. We're all here to help each other, no matter how it might appear." DSkip
    Silverline Sonatina MkI, LSi15, LSi7, LSiC, LSiFX, LS/FX, DSW MP2000
  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    edited May 20
    ZLTFUL wrote: »
    Media Monkey and JRiver are considered some of the best ripping software out there. But you're welcome to try again.

    Or it could be that your ears aren't the end all, be all of listening perfection you believe them to be maybe??

    Not trying to pick a fight but I have proven to some of your "colleagues" (or is it cohorts or even alternate personalities? Hmmm...) that I can differentiate between the two.

    To reiterate my point about wine, if people can taste differently, see differently, smell differently, feel differently, then why is it so god awful hard to believe that someone could possibly hear differently than you? This is the part you people seem to be so hung up on and not willing to even consider.

    Not sure if there is One simple reason........This does not seem to be a hearing related thing.
    I have also heard MP3 That was fairly mediocre also. So I may know what you mean.
    I have 3 other devices that do not do well on MP3.

    I can not truly explain the technical "Why" of how some "machines" do it poorly and some it sounds very good.

    I have heard MP3 also that I could relatively easily identify.
    So not in total disagreement there.


    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • sucks2bemesucks2beme Posts: 4,774
    Let's face it. The next big thing will be a format with built in DRM.
    The industry wants us to pay and pay to listen. No more ripping
    CD's and playing it anywhere you want.
    "The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." --Thomas Jefferson
  • BlueFoxBlueFox Posts: 9,310
    K_M wrote: »
    All recordings can be extrapolated "down" to an equivalent bit rate.

    The recording itself many times limits the final fidelity. Even though it may have been recorded to "High resolution digital" or High speed Open reel.
    There may be "potential" for better sound, but very few recordings even push the envelope of CD quality sound.

    What? Not sure what you are saying here. Can you explain it in more detail? It appears you are saying recordings made with high-res digital or high-res analog are lower in resolution than a CD.

    Bud

    Lumin S1
    Sony XA-5400ES SACD
    Pass XP-20 pre, X600.5 amps
    Magico S5 MKII Mcast Rose speakers, SPOD spikes

    Shunyata Triton v3/Typhon for source, Denali 2000 (2) for amps
    Shunyata Z Anaconda XLR analog ICs, Z Anaconda speaker cables
    Shunyata Sigma HC (2), Sigma Analog, Sigma Digital, Z Anaconda (3) power cables
    Revelation Audio Cryo-Silver Reference DB-25 umbilical power cable for preamp modules

    Mapleshade Samson V.3 four shelf solid maple rack, Micropoint brass footers
    Three 20 amp circuits.
  • nbrowsernbrowser Posts: 6,767
    ZLTFUL wrote: »
    MP3s even at 320kbps sound "tinny" to me compared to the same song ripped from the same disc in WAV format.

    An example is a back to back listen of Money for Nothing by Dire Straits where glaring differences are represented even on desktop computer speakers.

    But then I can also tell the difference between a Malbec and Cab Sav. B)

    I have to agree, 320 MP3s do sound tinny, something is horribly lost in the compression and I can hear it between a CD and the MP3. That all said however I remember in '98 getting on to the interwebs....installing Winamp and playing a lot lower Kbps MP3s...yeah...bad bad bad.


    And no, there's nothing wrong with my ears.
    Living room: Samsung UN55KU7000 4K UHD HDR 55 inch TV, Marantz CD6004, Pro-Ject Debut Carbon, Parasound zPhono, Mac Mini, Oppo BDP-93, XBox One S 2Tb, Kenwood DPX792BH car deck for radio purposes, Marantz SR5010 AVR, Parasound HCA-1200II, Front SDA 2 modded with Larrys Rings and RD0-194-1 tweeters, Rear Onkyo SKF-4800 Towers, Center CSiA6, BOOM Tannoy TS2.12 Sub, Audioquest Evergreen interconnects just about everywhere except from AVR to amp, MIT Terminator 4, MIT AVT3 speaker cables with extra terminals covered up Monitor 5 Jr+ in the wings for a center channel.
  • tonybtonyb Posts: 27,498
    K_M wrote: »
    tonyb wrote: »
    steveinaz wrote: »
    Convenience or quality....take your pick, but don't fool yourself for a millisecond that mp3 is an acceptable format for hi-fi systems.

    The study I read on the subject about 15 years ago compared the quality of Mp3 at various bit rates. I've heard audio lectures at 5 kps and the voice was still distinguishable, but a poor recording. At 64 kps the quality is much improved, but when the audience claps the sound got muddied. The study compared FM radio quality to 80 -96 kps Mp3. At 128kps, only a few people in 1,000 could distinguish the difference between Mp3 and Cds - 128kps was a common bit rate 10 years ago. The study also claimed that at 170kps and above no one could consistently distinguish between Mp3 and CDs. I've personally compared high bit rate Mp3 to many times over the last dozen years and now I've compared it to Flac files. I'll do so again later this summer and next year with some quality headphones. Mp3 gets much, much better at the higher bit rates.

    You can find a study on anything, for or against ....pretty much anything. Rarely is there a consistent viewpoint especially in subjective areas like audio. If MP3's float your boat, rock on....use them and be happy.

    Since we can agree MP3 gets much better at higher bitrates, then we should be able to agree CD quality or lossless files, which are even at higher bitrates, should then sound better, no ? Taking it further, SACD should then sound better than cd and so forth. Generally speaking obviously, because bitrates are not the only thing that makes or breaks good sound.

    Not necessarily. One truth does not automatically equate to another truth based on mere extrapolation.

    All recordings can be extrapolated "down" to an equivalent bit rate.

    The recording itself many times limits the final fidelity. Even though it may have been recorded to "High resolution digital" or High speed Open reel.
    There may be "potential" for better sound, but very few recordings even push the envelope of CD quality sound.

    I get your point, and we all know the virtues of a good recording. I would disagree though about pushing the envelope of cd quality sound. Way too many avenues to cover that one.

    If we can agree on at least CD quality sound having merit over MP3, that's a step in the right direction. ;)

    Cathy further validated my point of people not caring about sound quality on their portable devices for casual background music. Which is fine for MP3's, but if I'm going to sit down and listen, nah....we can do better. Especially in todays world where we don't need to get up and change cd's. Downloaded into a lossless format and have it at your fingertips.....just like your portable MP3 devices.

    It's been my experience, even with my sub par hearing, that crappy recordings, be it 320 MP3'S or CD's, still has a sound difference between the 2 formats though not as huge as better recordings do.

    You also hear many say they can't tell the difference playing the 2 formats on their computer speakers, small Bluetooth speaker or what not. One can then say, it is indeed the limitations of that audio system that is hiding the sound quality, right ? Nobody expects computer speakers to be as revealing as a full sized speaker, and the gear accompanying them. Least I hope not.

    It's not meant as an insult to anyone when we say your system may not be revealing enough to compliment better recordings. Some simply do better at it than others, that's why we have such a variety in speakers and gear available to us. Same can be said for anything really, I mean....a Yugo can still get you from point A to point B just like a Mercedes can, right ? Doesn't mean everyone should be happy with the Yugo. If a Yugo fits you and your lifestyle though, drive it like you stole it. Same with MP3's, if it fits you and your lifestyle, rock it and be happy, won't stop others from seeking better though.
    legacy Focus 20/20
    Butler tdb 2250
    Cary Xciter dac
    Joule LA-100
    Pioneer BDP 320
    Sony 4k 55 850c
    FX 500 surround
    Acoustic zen Satori SC's
    Pioneer elite vsx21
    Sonos-Cullen mod.
    Audio Metallurgy GA-0 digital
    PS Audio Quintet
    Analysis Plus crystal ovals
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2's IC
  • NightfallNightfall Posts: 6,948
    Yeah but if you buy a Yugo instead of a Merc you'll have more money left over for records, CDs, concerts, and video games. Plus you'll still get where you're going. ;)
    | Front - Dynaudio Emit M20 | Center - N/A | Rear - Polk Monitor 4 | Sub - N/A |
    | AVR - Yamaha Aventage RX-A1020 | Preamp - Dared MC-7P | Amp - B&K Reference 4420 |
    | Turntable - Yamaha PX-3 | Cartridge - Dynavector DV-20X2H | Digital Source - AURALiC Aries Mini |
    | TV - LG 60" 4K | Gaming - Xbox One - PS3 - New 3DS XL - Nvidia Shield TV |

    This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality
    Embrace this moment, remember, we are eternal
    All this pain is an illusion
  • F1nutF1nut Posts: 38,041
    Nightfall wrote: »
    Yeah but if you buy a Yugo instead of a Merc you'll have more money left over for records, CDs, concerts, and video games. Plus you'll still get where you're going. ;)

    Not for long.
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


  • lightman1lightman1 Posts: 8,505
    F1nut wrote: »
    Nightfall wrote: »
    Yeah but if you buy a Yugo instead of a Merc you'll have more money left over for records, CDs, concerts, and video games. Plus you'll still get where you're going. ;)

    Not for long.

    He was being facetious, dingleberry. Notice the winky thing post period? ;)
  • F1nutF1nut Posts: 38,041
    Too tiny, I missed it.....LOL
    Political Correctness'.........defined

    "A doctrine fostered by a delusional, illogical minority and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a t-u-r-d by the clean end."


  • lightman1lightman1 Posts: 8,505
    Tur d......
  • NightfallNightfall Posts: 6,948
    It's the same as a Bentley, what are you talking about?

    | Front - Dynaudio Emit M20 | Center - N/A | Rear - Polk Monitor 4 | Sub - N/A |
    | AVR - Yamaha Aventage RX-A1020 | Preamp - Dared MC-7P | Amp - B&K Reference 4420 |
    | Turntable - Yamaha PX-3 | Cartridge - Dynavector DV-20X2H | Digital Source - AURALiC Aries Mini |
    | TV - LG 60" 4K | Gaming - Xbox One - PS3 - New 3DS XL - Nvidia Shield TV |

    This body holding me reminds me of my own mortality
    Embrace this moment, remember, we are eternal
    All this pain is an illusion
  • tonybtonyb Posts: 27,498
    What I don't understand in this MP3 discussion is, some say that 320bps MP3 is definitely better than 168 bps MP3. Understandable since that's twice as many bits. Then they say they can't hear a difference between 320 bps and cd quality which is over 1100, more than 3 times the bit rate of 320 MP3's. Doesn't compute to me.
    legacy Focus 20/20
    Butler tdb 2250
    Cary Xciter dac
    Joule LA-100
    Pioneer BDP 320
    Sony 4k 55 850c
    FX 500 surround
    Acoustic zen Satori SC's
    Pioneer elite vsx21
    Sonos-Cullen mod.
    Audio Metallurgy GA-0 digital
    PS Audio Quintet
    Analysis Plus crystal ovals
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2's IC
  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    tonyb wrote: »
    It's not meant as an insult to anyone when we say your system may not be revealing enough to compliment better recordings. Some simply do better at it than others, that's why we have such a variety in speakers and gear available to us.

    No, its a tired cliched logical fallacy.


    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • tonybtonyb Posts: 27,498
    I get your laws of diminishing returns theory, and in some cases it may hold true depending on the quality of the recording. However, it can also carry weight as to the capabilities of your system as the bottleneck of why the differences may be slight to you. Lots of variables....so it's hard to make blanked assumptions in audio without investigating everything in the chain. That's all I'm sayin'....

    Now, why would you buy a cd and download it to a lessor quality format ? Even entry level receivers can do PCM and higher bit rate files. Apple lossless, can be played on any computer with ITunes. You can always convert it down to MP3 for your car or portable devices, but you can't convert MP3 to cd quality.
    legacy Focus 20/20
    Butler tdb 2250
    Cary Xciter dac
    Joule LA-100
    Pioneer BDP 320
    Sony 4k 55 850c
    FX 500 surround
    Acoustic zen Satori SC's
    Pioneer elite vsx21
    Sonos-Cullen mod.
    Audio Metallurgy GA-0 digital
    PS Audio Quintet
    Analysis Plus crystal ovals
    Acoustic zen Matrix 2's IC
  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    tonyb wrote: »
    I get your laws of diminishing returns theory, and in some cases it may hold true depending on the quality of the recording. However, it can also carry weight as to the capabilities of your system as the bottleneck of why the differences may be slight to you. Lots of variables....so it's hard to make blanked assumptions in audio without investigating everything in the chain. That's all I'm sayin'....

    I think we are seeing a lot of variables in the comments also.

    Some say it is utterly horrible, not even close to good fidelity, and can even be told on the cheapest of Desktop speakers,.....you are saying only on a very "revealing system" is it possible to hear differences, and DuB and I are saying it is hard to tell even on a good system.

    Until we all hear each others systems, there is not enough evidence of proof of what is good or bad or for sure to even discuss it.

    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • gcegce Posts: 2,117
    There might be another factor in this. Some people just can't hear the difference and not because of the system but because how sensitive their hearing is or is not.
    Anaheim Hills CA,
    HT 5.1: Anthem MRX 720 / BDP-Denon DBT1713UD / Polkaudio LSiM703 / W4S mAmp's / Polkaudio LSiM706c / Polkaudio LSiM702F/X's / SVS PC12-NSD / Panasonic TC P55VT30

    2 Channel: Rogue RP-5 / WireWorld Electra power cord / Marantz TT-15S1/ Ortofon - Quintet Black MC / Marantz NA8005 DAC / W4S mAmp's / Synology DS 216+ll-4TB / Polkaudio LSiM703
  • erniejadeerniejade Posts: 3,721
    A good 320 MP3 can sound good but, my uncompressed wave rips or cd or sacd sound better especially on the home rig however, on my DJ rig, I have been using MP3. Primecuts, my dj music service, puts everything in MP3 format and just recently now offers flac without a price difference. On the DJ rig, the flac sounds slightly better but 90% of the people I am playing to cannot tell the difference.

    Remember, when I am running a karaoke or dj gig, it's going through a Yamaha board, xlr out to the ev zxa5 tops and ext18sp subs, usually outside shooting sound from 20-300 feet away. At this kind of distance, I don't think a lot of people will tell the difference as long as the MP3 quality is at 320 and not a bad download.

    That said, whenever I changed my hard drives, I might start using the flac versions of the dj music. Right now I am using a 2tb drive split into 2 partitions. One for karaoke and one for music and they are getting up there in age as well as getting low on space. I am still waiting for ssd drives to get a bit bigger and come down more in price.

    I keep my dj stuff and my personal music separate on completely different drives.
    Lumin D1, KEF LS50 Wireless, Cayin scd-50T, LH Labs VI Dac, Technics 1200, Denon DL160, Jolida D9, HP I7 Laptop, Wireworld Eclipse 7, Wireworld Aurora, Wireworld Electra 7, Signal Magic Digital, Cardas Quadralink 5C, Velodyne SPL1200
    USB helpers: Intona, w4s Recovery

    HT: Elite SC27, Full Polk RTI setup.

  • erniejadeerniejade Posts: 3,721
    I hit the wrong button and submitted.

    While I can see where MP3 is great for convenience, uncompressed still sounds way better IF your rig can tell the difference. For my DJ rig, I have an old echo indigo dj card and a native instrument traktor sound card that can do 24/48 so I am not using the laptop headphone jack and great for portable on the road dj use but still not as good as my vi dac, or lumin, or the built in dac on my KEF.
    Lumin D1, KEF LS50 Wireless, Cayin scd-50T, LH Labs VI Dac, Technics 1200, Denon DL160, Jolida D9, HP I7 Laptop, Wireworld Eclipse 7, Wireworld Aurora, Wireworld Electra 7, Signal Magic Digital, Cardas Quadralink 5C, Velodyne SPL1200
    USB helpers: Intona, w4s Recovery

    HT: Elite SC27, Full Polk RTI setup.

  • K_MK_M Posts: 934
    I guess time for a hearing aid.....(No offense Tony)!
    Lsi15, Lsi9, LsiC,Rta11t,M5jr+,M4,SDA 3.1TL, SDA SRS 2.3TL, Rti6....Still listing stuff, a work in progress.
    B+W-
    Epos-
    Infinity-
    Advent-

  • zuulzuul Posts: 104
    edited May 21
    sadly for me, mp3's are a necessary evil... anything that i've ripped myself has been FLAC for going on ten years... however there is a lot of music i have to source and oftentimes the only source available is mp3.

    for example as a huge devotee of dub reggae... it's hard enough to find the vinyl/cds... finding digital files is like a needle in a haystack... especially for the oop stuff of which there is much.... because of the nature of these things.... the websites that have this content are often fleeting and it's a matter of getting when and where you can b/c you may never see it again... to be fair. a lot of the hard to find stuff are mp3's of needle drops of original vinyl long since out of print. a FLAC copy of that will probably only reveal all the imperfections and i think the compression helps a bit in that respect... with regards to that specific genre...

    i actually have my digital collection broken out by genre, and then bitrate. the majority of my files are 320 or FLAC but a lot of the oop and impossible to find otherwise stuff falls under 320k.

    i've been using amazon prime a lot for streaming music lately.... it's actually amazing how much content they have... in not much time i managed to put 622 albums in my cloud... i also like amazon because they have adjustable bitrate output. for the high quality setting i think it's 256k AAC... which is close enough to cd quality to be worth the ten bucks a month considering you get amazon video and 2 day shipping all in the same package. i used to use pandora but i hardly ever do anymore.... in the car over bluetooth my amazon collection on shuffle is better than my pandora stations on shuffle.

    my buddy the sound engineer says that you can't hear the difference between the higher resolutions anyway... and mocks my quest for an all lossless world. i argue that his sound is damaged from 20 years of mixing bands in small spaces.... and that my hearing, despite being a drummer, is such that i can hear differences... or at least my brain has convinced itself it can although based on some scientific studies i've read it probably actually can't.
    speakers:
    polk 5jr+ w/ RDO194-1 upgraded tweeters
    polk psw-10
    components:
    sonic frontiers line 1 preamp
    sonic frontiers anthem amp 1
    mac mini w/ audioquest jitterbug
    PopPulse uii DAC
    oppo dv-980h dvd/cd
    interconnects:
    vampire wire
    NXG sapphire
    monoprice
    guzi
    speaker wire
    audioquest type 4
    power:
    rhino 1000w 15amp voltage regulator
    vansevers 211 power cord
    pangea ac-14 power cord
    tubes:
    amp: (2) NOS 1960 philco/lansdale 12AU7 (super rare!), (1) NOS 1967 mullard 12AX7, (4) 2016 svetlana hard blue EL-34
    pre: (6) E88CC/6922 ??? (haven't cracked the case yet to see what previous owner was running...) so for now they are mystery tubes.
    misc:
    subdude subwoofer platform
    DeMoude Audio cylindrical bass traps
    rf/emi/noise reduction caps for empty rca inputs.
  • cfrizzcfrizz Posts: 12,641
    That may be what they want, but it will never be achieved since there will ALWAYS be someone posting software to break the DRM!

    If the industry is stupid enough to try to totally restrict us in how we utilize our stuff, I won't have any problem with breaking the DRM.
    sucks2beme wrote: »
    Let's face it. The next big thing will be a format with built in DRM.
    The industry wants us to pay and pay to listen. No more ripping
    CD's and playing it anywhere you want.

    Sunfire TGP III PrePro, Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature 405wpc 5 ch. Amp, Oppo 103 BluRay, Rotel RCD-1072 CDP, Sony Bravia KDL-40R510C TV, Polk S60 Main Speakers, Boston VR-920 Center Channel, SVS NSD-12 SB12 Subwoofer, Polk DSW 400 Subwoofer, Polk FXi-3 Surround Speakers
  • mrbigbluelightmrbigbluelight Posts: 7,212
    nbrowser wrote: »
    That all said however I remember in '98 getting on to the interwebs....installing Winamp and playing a lot lower Kbps MP3s...yeah...bad bad bad.

    Thanks for the flashback. :)



    MrBigBlueLight
    Here to pick your brain & steal your cookies
    Shifting to Plan B+
Sign In or Register to comment.

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!